SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2023 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2023›WEEK 2›HOU @ RICE›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
ORE @ TTU80
IOWA @ ISU79
ILL @ KU75
ND @ NCSU72
MISS @ TULN70
NMSU @ LIB70
MRSH @ ECU69
TEM @ RUTG67
TA&M @ MIA66
UNLV @ MICH66
ARIZ @ MSST66
BALL @ UGA65
APP @ UNC64
JMU @ UVA63
TEX @ ALA63
CLT @ MD63
USM @ FSU63
TLSA @ WASH62
MTSU @ MIZ62
UCLA @ SDSU62
UTAH @ BAY61
PUR @ VT60
UAB @ GASO60
CIN @ PITT60
AUB @ CAL60
TROY @ KSU59
OHIO @ FAU59
UCF @ BOIS59
UTEP @ NU58
HOU @ RICE58
NEB @ COLO56
WIS @ WSU56
KENT @ ARK54
WMU @ SYR53
AF @ SHSU53
STAN @ USC53
VAN @ WAKE51
TXST @ UTSA51
SMU @ OU51
JXST @ CCU48
OKST @ ASU48
M-OH @ MASS46
MEM @ ARST44
CONN @ GAST43
UNT @ FIU42
UL @ ODU38
EMU @ MINN37
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
HOUSTON
RICE
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2023
SAT 19:00 ET|RICE STADIUMNONCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP37|O/U51.0COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
76FPI
HOUB12HOUSTON
41
4-8
65
13
30
23%
31
65
29.0
-350
-7.0
HOME
—AP
83FPI
RICEAACRICE
43
6-7
28
80
32
43%
18
15
22.0
+275
+7.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2023CONSENSUS · BOVADA
FINALHOU41—RICE43
CLOSED HOU -7.0TOTAL 51.0RICE COVERED · 84 POINTS · OVER
HOU
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
RICE
41
POINTS
43
443
TOTAL YARDS
470
260 (24-43)
PASSING
401 (28-42)
183 (38)
RUSHING
69 (31)
27
FIRST DOWNS
24
9-17
THIRD DOWN
8-14
2-4
FOURTH DOWN
1-1
28:10
TIME OF POSS.
31:50
6-44
PENALTIES
4-38
1
TURNOVERS
2
—
SACKS
—
—
QB HURRIES
—
HOU
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
RICE
0.135
SEASON 0.132
EPA / PLAY
0.356
SEASON 0.301
45.9%
SEASON 39.6%
SUCCESS RATE
49.4%
SEASON 45.2%
12.9%
SEASON 15.9%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
22.2%
SEASON 16.4%
5.09
SEASON 5.63
YARDS / PLAY
7.20
SEASON 6.53
0.356
SEASON 0.265
EPA ALLOWED
0.135
SEASON 0.163
49.4%
SEASON 46.2%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
45.9%
SEASON 41.2%
22.2%
SEASON 17.2%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
12.9%
SEASON 14.8%
18.8%
SEASON 15.9%
STUFF RATE
6.7%
SEASON 14.2%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2023 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT7 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 2 FIELD n=47
MARKET
TOTAL51.0
SPREADHOU -7.0
IMPLIED — HOU29.0
IMPLIED — RICE22.0
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
50FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
27 / 47
BY ENVIRONMENT
25 / 47
DISAGREEMENT2 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 2 positions on a 47-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
SLOW × SLOW
HOU PACE28.5s
31
RICE PACE29.4s
18
SHARED PACE29.0s
25
PLAY VOLUME124
25
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
HOU60CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
68
PROE
81
TEMPO
31
EXPLOSIVE68p
68
PROE81p
81
TEMPO31p
31
RICE64CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
84
PROE
90
TEMPO
18
EXPLOSIVE84p
84
PROE90p
90
TEMPO18p
18
IS THE RECORD REAL2023 · FULL SEASON
HOURECORD MATCHES
4-8ACTUALvs4.0-8.0FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.0 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME-7.8
HOUSTON won 4 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 4.0. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
RICERECORD MATCHES
6-6ACTUALvs6.9-5.1FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.9 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-3
POINT MARGIN / GAME+3.6
RICE won 6 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 6.9. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERHOUSTONRICE2023 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB99%Clayton TuneQB · 99% OF ROOM PARTICIPATION
DB77%Art GreenDB · 20% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONGervarrius OwensDB · 19% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONJayce RogersDB · 18% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
WR/TE46%Nathaniel DellWR · 28% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONKeSean CarterWR · 16% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB44%Donavan MutinLB · 29% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONMannie NunneryPORTAL · FLORIDA · 15% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DL43%D'Anthony JonesDL · 14% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONAtlias BellDL · 10% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONJamykal NealDL · 7% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL37%Cam'Ron JohnsonPORTAL · MISSOURI · 19% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONLance RobinsonPORTAL · LOUISVILLE · 16% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
RB31%Ta'Zhawn HenryRB · 31% OF ROOM PARTICIPATION
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBDonovan Smith · PORTAL ★3 · TEXAS TECHREFILLED
DBMalik Fleming · PORTAL ★3 · EAST CAROLINAAdari Haulcy · PORTAL ★3 · NEW MEXICOBrian George · PORTAL ★3 · TEXAS A&M4 MORE ARRIVALSREFILLED
WR/TEStephon Johnson · PORTAL ★3 · OKLAHOMA STATEJoshua Cobbs · PORTAL ★3 · WYOMINGJonah Wilson · SIGNEE ★42 MORE ARRIVALSREFILLED
LBIsh Harris · PORTAL ★3 · TEXAS A&MDavid Ugwoegbu · PORTAL ★3 · OKLAHOMAAubrey Smith · PORTAL ★3 · COLORADO1 MORE ARRIVALREFILLED
DLJalen Hunt · PORTAL ★3 · MICHIGAN STATEJustin Benton · SIGNEE ★3Jett Runion · SIGNEE ★3PARTIAL
OLJaylen Garth · PORTAL ★3 · TEXASPARTIAL
RBTony Mathis · PORTAL ★3 · WEST VIRGINIAParker Jenkins · SIGNEE ★4Sergio Snider · SIGNEE ★3REFILLED
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · HOUSTON
CARRIED COMPOSITE
34.96 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
31.810 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
36.812 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB515178072 OF 7 GRADED
RB43434435104 OF 10 GRADED
WR/TE494959622314 OF 23 GRADED
OL434355891613 OF 16 GRADED
DL585877741815 OF 18 GRADED
LB454562971410 OF 14 GRADED
DB515181222213 OF 22 GRADED
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE65th65
BLUE-CHIP RATIO15%63
RECRUITING CLASS#55 · 3/18 BC59
CLASS RANK TREND+26 · 3 CYCLES100
PORTAL NET BLUE-CHIP-2 · 20 IN / 21 OUT—
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 5th YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX34%44
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
RICEMIKE BLOOMGREN6TH SEASON2 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
9797
PACE
2222
PASS RATE
9696
EXPLOSIVENESS
9393
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
4141
HAVOC
5757
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
HOUDANA HOLGORSEN5TH SEASON1 SEASON · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
8383
PACE
3232
PASS RATE
9494
EXPLOSIVENESS
7474
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
7171
HAVOC
66
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESHOU OFFENSERICE OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBHOUSTON OFFENSE
NATIONAL
83OF 133
TAL
78
PERF
51
RET
0
NATIONAL
91OF 133
RET
79
FULL DEFENSERICE DEFENSE
HOU QUARTERBACKSn=7100% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
UI ALEQBTRUE FR
493RD YR16—UNR—
DONOVAN SMITHQBPORTAL · TEXAS TECH
484TH YR9078★3+23
LUCAS COLEYQBRET
442ND YR—70★3—
CALEB MCMICKLEQBTRUE FR
373RD YR—17★3—
INDIANA WIJAYQBTRUE FR
352ND YR—26★3—
SHOW ALL 7
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RICE DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 51 PLAYERS23% VACATED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
4165%0%
LINEBACKERSLB
4076%0%
SECONDARYDB
3983%0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLHOUSTON OFFENSE
NATIONAL
99OF 133
TAL
55
PERF
43
RET
89
DL
98OF 133
DL RET
65
LB
101OF 133
LB RET
76
FRONT-7RICE DEFENSE
HOU OFFENSIVE LINEn=1611% VACATED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
REUBEN UNIJEOLRET
524TH YR7164★3-26
PATRICK PAULOLRET
853RD YR9326★3+15
TYLER JOHNSONGRET
744TH YR8198★4+41
SHAMAR HOBDY-LEEOLTRUE FR
524TH YR7217★3+28
DEMETRIUS HUNTEROLRET
524TH YR3364★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RICE FRONT-7n=24 · 2 ROOMS31% VACATED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DE'BRAYLON CARROLLDLRET
594TH YR9064★3+9
JORDAN CAMPBELLDETRUE FR
574TH YR35—UNR—
ELROYAL MORRIS IIIDLRET
524TH YR3030★3—
CHIBBY NWAJUAKUDLRET
524TH YR1931★3—
KENNY SEYMOURDLRET
514TH YR3340★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBHOUSTON OFFENSE
NATIONAL
96OF 133
TAL
44
PERF
43
RET
35
DL
98OF 133
DL RET
65
LB
101OF 133
LB RET
76
FRONT-7RICE DEFENSE
HOU RUNNING BACKSn=1065% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
STACY SNEEDRBRET
604TH YR7059★3+33
PARKER JENKINSRBTRUE FR
483RD YR6245★3-22
BRANDON CAMPBELLRBRET
423RD YR6587★4-34
TONY MATHIS JR.RBTRUE FR
414TH YR829★3-40
KELAN WALKERRBRET
484TH YR—65★3+23 2022
SHOW ALL 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RICE FRONT-72 ROOMS · 24 PLAYERS30% VACATED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.554165%0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.454076%0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEHOUSTON OFFENSE
NATIONAL
83OF 133
TAL
59
PERF
49
RET
62
DB
117OF 133
DB RET
83
SECONDARYRICE DEFENSE
HOU PASS CATCHERSn=2338% VACATED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JOSEPH MANJACK IVWRRET
654TH YR8464★3+10
SAMUEL BROWNWRRET
583RD YR9894★4+5
BRYAN HENRYTERET
523RD YR2335★3—
JONAH WILSONWRTRUE FR
523RD YR2345★3—
MATTHEW GOLDENWRRET
513RD YR9397★4+14
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RICE SECONDARYn=27 · 1 ROOM17% VACATED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JONATHAN JEANDBTRUE FR
764TH YR6227★3-21
SEAN FRESCHCBRET
754TH YR9652★3-29
TYSON FLOWERSSRET
664TH YR5378★3-5
TRE'SHON DEVONESCBRET
664TH YR8764★3-2
DAVEON HOOKSRET
584TH YR5213★2+28
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
HOU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
RICE
SCOUT TEAM GRADE
48.0
46.2
— OFFENSE
44.6
52.3
— DEFENSE
51.4
40.1
SP+ OVERALL
-7.8
-10.2
FPI
-2.1
-3.9
ELO
1421
1294
TALENT
670
467
PRODUCTION
29
23
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+35
+2
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.15
0.03
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
HOU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
RICE
OFF EFFICIENCY
27
62
DEF EFFICIENCY
10
70
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
68
84
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
47
61
FINISHING DRIVES
9
88
FIELD POSITION
77
67
TURNOVER MARGIN
15
33
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
HOU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
RICE
PASS RATE
57.8%
56.5%
PROE
+5.9
+9.0
PACE
28.5s
29.4s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
29%
27%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
49.7%
50.6%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
72.5%
73.2%
PLAYS / GAME
63.2
61.2
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.1%
2.7%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = HOU, ORANGE = RICE) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2023, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE