SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2023 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2023›WEEK 5›MICH @ NEB›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
LSU @ MISS85
LOU @ NCSU73
UTAH @ ORST73
CLEM @ SYR72
ND @ DUKE70
TA&M @ ARK68
UGA @ AUB68
ORE @ STAN68
PITT @ VT68
ALA @ MSST67
FLA @ UK66
MIZ @ VAN66
BOIS @ MEM66
UVA @ BC65
MSU @ IOWA65
TROY @ GAST64
MICH @ NEB63
JXST @ SHSU62
PSU @ NU62
USA @ JMU62
IU @ MD62
WVU @ TCU62
USC @ COLO61
BUF @ AKR61
WASH @ ARIZ61
TXST @ USM60
ECU @ RICE60
ODU @ MRSH59
ASU @ CAL58
KU @ TEX58
ILL @ PUR57
CLT @ SMU57
HOU @ TTU55
USF @ NAVY54
SC @ TENN54
BAY @ UCF52
ISU @ OU52
NIU @ TOL51
SDSU @ AF51
ARST @ MASS50
CCU @ GASO49
CIN @ BYU48
BGSU @ GT48
UNM @ WYO47
UL @ MINN45
M-OH @ KENT45
APP @ ULM43
TEM @ TLSA42
MTSU @ WKU42
BALL @ WMU41
LT @ UTEP40
USU @ CONN38
UAB @ TULN37
HAW @ UNLV37
EMU @ CMU36
NEV @ FRES35
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
MICHIGAN
NEBRASKA
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2023
SAT 15:30 ET|MEMORIAL STADIUM (LINCOLN, NE)CONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP5|O/U39.0COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#1AP
1FPI
MICHB1GMICHIGAN
45
15-0
91
88
95
78%
21
65
28.0
-950
-17.0
HOME
—AP
60FPI
NEBB1GNEBRASKA
7
5-7
85
32
83
14%
5
52
11.0
+625
+17.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2023CONSENSUS · DRAFTKINGS
FINALMICH45—NEB7
CLOSED MICH -17.0TOTAL 39.0MICH COVERED · 52 POINTS · OVER
MICH
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
NEB
45
POINTS
7
436
TOTAL YARDS
305
187 (16-23)
PASSING
199 (14-25)
249 (51)
RUSHING
106 (21)
26
FIRST DOWNS
10
8-13
THIRD DOWN
3-10
2-3
FOURTH DOWN
1-3
38:01
TIME OF POSS.
21:59
0-0
PENALTIES
4-30
0
TURNOVERS
1
4
SACKS
0
4
QB HURRIES
1
MICH
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
NEB
0.404
SEASON 0.305
EPA / PLAY
0.015
SEASON 0.149
56.1%
SEASON 49.3%
SUCCESS RATE
27.8%
SEASON 38.5%
13.6%
SEASON 16.4%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
13.9%
SEASON 14.8%
6.30
SEASON 6.22
YARDS / PLAY
6.11
SEASON 5.41
0.015
SEASON 0.052
EPA ALLOWED
0.404
SEASON 0.107
27.8%
SEASON 33.7%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
56.1%
SEASON 37.5%
13.9%
SEASON 10.5%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
13.6%
SEASON 11.1%
7.1%
SEASON 20.1%
STUFF RATE
6.5%
SEASON 12.1%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2023 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT7 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 5 FIELD n=56
MARKET
TOTAL39.0
SPREADMICH -17.0
IMPLIED — MICH28.0
IMPLIED — NEB11.0
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
29FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
54 / 56
BY ENVIRONMENT
54 / 56
DISAGREEMENT0 SLOTSBoth rankings put this game in the same place on the week's board.
PACE COLLISION
SLOW × SLOW
MICH PACE29.3s
21
NEB PACE30.9s
5
SHARED PACE30.1s
13
PLAY VOLUME120
13
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
MICH30CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
26
PROE
44
TEMPO
21
EXPLOSIVE26p
26
PROE44p
44
TEMPO21p
21
NEB27CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
70
PROE
4
TEMPO
5
EXPLOSIVE70p
70
PROE4p
4
TEMPO5p
5
IS THE RECORD REAL2023 · FULL SEASON
MICHRECORD MATCHES
13-0ACTUALvs12.5-0.5FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.5 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-0
POINT MARGIN / GAME+27.2
MICHIGAN won 13 of 13 against a scoring profile describing 12.5. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
NEBRECORD MATCHES
5-7ACTUALvs5.9-6.1FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.9 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-5
POINT MARGIN / GAME-0.3
NEBRASKA won 5 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 5.9. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERMICHIGANNEBRASKA2023 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
WR/TE52%Luke SchoonmakerTE · 19% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONRonnie BellWR · 14% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONJoel HonigfordTE · 9% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION6 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB40%R.J. MotenPORTAL · FLORIDA · 16% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONMike MorrisLB · 13% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONTaylor UpshawPORTAL · ARIZONA · 10% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
OL35%Olusegun OluwatimiOL · 18% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONRyan HayesOL · 16% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DL33%Mazi SmithDL · 21% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONEyabi Okie-AnomaPORTAL · CHARLOTTE · 9% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB31%DJ TurnerDB · 19% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONGemon GreenDB · 12% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
QB9%Cade McNamaraPORTAL · IOWA · 7% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
RB4%Isaiah GashRB · 4% OF ROOM PARTICIPATION
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
WR/TEAJ Barner · PORTAL ★4 · INDIANAKarmello English · SIGNEE ★4Deakon Tonielli · SIGNEE ★42 MORE ARRIVALSREFILLED
LBErnest Hausmann · PORTAL ★4 · NEBRASKASemaj Bridgeman · SIGNEE ★4REFILLED
OLLaDarius Henderson · PORTAL ★4 · ARIZONA STATEDrake Nugent · PORTAL ★4 · STANFORDMyles Hinton · PORTAL ★4 · STANFORD3 MORE ARRIVALSREFILLED
DLJosaiah Stewart · PORTAL ★4 · COASTAL CAROLINAEnow Etta · SIGNEE ★4Cameron Brandt · SIGNEE ★32 MORE ARRIVALSREFILLED
DBJosh Wallace · PORTAL ★3 · MASSACHUSETTSJyaire Hill · SIGNEE ★4Cam Calhoun · SIGNEE ★4REFILLED
QBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
RBCole Cabana · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · MICHIGAN
CARRIED COMPOSITE
59.673 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
65.677 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
55.756 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB6969939364 OF 6 GRADED
RB424294971110 OF 11 GRADED
WR/TE575786672918 OF 29 GRADED
OL595992632115 OF 21 GRADED
DL757587872415 OF 24 GRADED
LB606083801810 OF 18 GRADED
DB646480672418 OF 24 GRADED
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE91st91
BLUE-CHIP RATIO47%89
RECRUITING CLASS#17 · 11/27 BC88
CLASS RANK TREND-7 · 3 CYCLES36
PORTAL NET BLUE-CHIP+3 · 9 IN / 13 OUT—
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 8th YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX18%3
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
NEBMATT RHULEFIRST SEASON3 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
4545
PACE
1919
PASS RATE
3434
EXPLOSIVENESS
1212
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
3434
HAVOC
8282
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
MICHJIM HARBAUGH8TH SEASON2 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
2828
PACE
4444
PASS RATE
55
EXPLOSIVENESS
2121
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
3535
HAVOC
9292
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESMICH OFFENSENEB OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBMICHIGAN OFFENSE
NATIONAL
23OF 133
TAL
93
PERF
69
RET
93
NATIONAL
48OF 133
RET
75
FULL DEFENSENEBRASKA DEFENSE
MICH QUARTERBACKSn=67% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
J.J. MCCARTHYQBRET
893RD YR9099★5+16
DAVIS WARRENQBRET
524TH YR2145★3—
ALEX ORJIQBRET
524TH YR245★3—
JACK TUTTLEQBPORTAL · INDIANA
514TH YR3128★3-9
JAYDEN DENEGALQBRET
504TH YR1317★3—
SHOW ALL 6
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
NEB DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 60 PLAYERS18% VACATED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
5162%28%
LINEBACKERSLB
4166%19%
SECONDARYDB
5197%10%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLMICHIGAN OFFENSE
NATIONAL
38OF 133
TAL
92
PERF
59
RET
63
DL
65OF 133
DL RET
62
LB
98OF 133
LB RET
66
FRONT-7NEBRASKA DEFENSE
MICH OFFENSIVE LINEn=2137% VACATED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TREVOR KEEGANOLRET
834TH YR8793★4+39
DRAKE NUGENTOLPORTAL · STANFORD
864TH YR9492★4+46
ZAK ZINTEROLRET
844TH YR9090★4+48
GIOVANNI EL-HADIOLRET
694TH YR5397★4+30
TRENTE JONESOLRET
574TH YR6396★4+0
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
NEB FRONT-7n=39 · 2 ROOMS36% VACATED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JIMARI BUTLERDERET
664TH YR6285★3+37
LUKE REIMERLBRET
634TH YR89—UNR+24
NASH HUTMACHERDLRET
614TH YR7776★3-4
CAMERON LENHARDTEDGETRUE FR
604TH YR5089★4+23
NICK HENRICHLBRET
573RD YR7094★4+7
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBMICHIGAN OFFENSE
NATIONAL
103OF 133
TAL
94
PERF
42
RET
97
DL
65OF 133
DL RET
62
LB
98OF 133
LB RET
66
FRONT-7NEBRASKA DEFENSE
MICH RUNNING BACKSn=113% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
BLAKE CORUMRBRET
634TH YR10095★4+25
DONOVAN EDWARDSRBRET
524TH YR9199★4+15
KALEL MULLINGSRBRET
524TH YR4794★4+33
TAVIERRE DUNLAPRBRET
514TH YR279★3+19
LEON FRANKLINRBRET
494TH YR27—UNR-44
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
NEB FRONT-72 ROOMS · 39 PLAYERS36% VACATED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.555162%28%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.454166%19%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEMICHIGAN OFFENSE
NATIONAL
51OF 133
TAL
86
PERF
57
RET
67
DB
67OF 133
DB RET
97
SECONDARYNEBRASKA DEFENSE
MICH PASS CATCHERSn=2933% VACATED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
COLSTON LOVELANDTERET
843RD YR8688★4+20
ROMAN WILSONWRRET
714TH YR8786★4+30
AJ BARNERTEPORTAL · INDIANA
634TH YR9095★4-26
MAX BREDESONTERET
574TH YR44—UNR+11
PEYTON O'LEARYWRRET
514TH YR25—UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
NEB SECONDARYn=21 · 1 ROOM3% VACATED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
QUINTON NEWSOMEDBRET
604TH YR9973★3-1
MARQUES BUFORD JR.DBRET
554TH YR82—UNR+2
TAMON LYNUMDBRET
554TH YR4045★3—
ISAAC GIFFORDDBRET
534TH YR9648★3+19
PHALEN SANFORDDBRET
524TH YR60—UNR+38
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
MICH
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
NEB
SCOUT TEAM GRADE
61.7
45.7
— OFFENSE
56.9
43.9
— DEFENSE
66.5
47.4
SP+ OVERALL
31.3
0.3
FPI
27.6
0.7
ELO
2210
1511
TALENT
850
765
PRODUCTION
100
51
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−10
+34
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.47
0.28
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
MICH
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
NEB
OFF EFFICIENCY
88
15
DEF EFFICIENCY
96
78
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
26
70
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
89
93
FINISHING DRIVES
90
16
FIELD POSITION
10
65
TURNOVER MARGIN
100
0
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
MICH
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
NEB
PASS RATE
41.4%
39.7%
PROE
−0.8
−10.3
PACE
29.3s
30.9s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
24%
15%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
64.7%
71.9%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
57.9%
62.5%
PLAYS / GAME
61.5
58.2
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
2.3%
2.4%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = MICH, ORANGE = NEB) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2023, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE