SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2022 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2022›WEEK 6›WKU @ UTSA›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
IOWA @ ILL82
KSU @ ISU81
TENN @ LSU76
LOU @ UVA76
UNC @ MIA75
TCU @ KU73
PUR @ MD71
UTAH @ UCLA71
FSU @ NCSU70
SMU @ UCF69
MICH @ IU69
USM @ TROY69
ECU @ TULN68
WIS @ NU68
OSU @ MSU68
WYO @ UNM68
HOU @ MEM67
ORST @ STAN67
WASH @ ASU64
TEX @ OU63
SC @ UK63
TTU @ OKST62
DUKE @ GT62
AUB @ UGA61
JMU @ ARST61
ORE @ ARIZ61
AF @ USU60
BYU @ ND60
TA&M @ ALA60
CCU @ ULM60
GASO @ GAST58
TLSA @ NAVY58
VT @ PITT58
BALL @ CMU58
CONN @ FIU57
CLEM @ BC57
FRES @ BOIS56
NEB @ RUTG55
ARMY @ WAKE55
LIB @ MASS54
ARK @ MSST51
WSU @ USC51
MTSU @ UAB50
WKU @ UTSA50
MIZ @ FLA49
MISS @ VAN49
USF @ CIN48
TOL @ NIU48
CSU @ NEV47
BUF @ BGSU47
APP @ TXST47
AKR @ OHIO43
KENT @ M-OH43
EMU @ WMU42
UNLV @ SJSU41
UTEP @ LT41
HAW @ SDSU33
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
WESTERN KENTUCKY
UTSA
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2022
SAT 18:00 ET|ALAMODOMECONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP4|O/U72.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
47FPI
WKUCUSAWESTERN KENTUCKY
28
9-5
42
33
21
17%
55
28
33.0
—
+6.5
HOME
—AP
59FPI
UTSAAACUTSA
31
11-3
46
55
23
82%
92
14
39.5
—
-6.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2022CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALWKU28—UTSA31
CLOSED UTSA -6.5TOTAL 72.5WKU COVERED · 59 POINTS · UNDER
WKU
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
UTSA
28
POINTS
31
481
TOTAL YARDS
486
373 (35-49)
PASSING
273 (24-35)
108 (24)
RUSHING
213 (45)
26
FIRST DOWNS
30
6-13
THIRD DOWN
6-14
1-4
FOURTH DOWN
2-3
29:58
TIME OF POSS.
30:02
7-53
PENALTIES
6-57
0
TURNOVERS
1
0
SACKS
0
1
QB HURRIES
2
WKU
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
UTSA
0.346
SEASON 0.230
EPA / PLAY
0.332
SEASON 0.307
43.8%
SEASON 43.7%
SUCCESS RATE
48.0%
SEASON 48.2%
16.4%
SEASON 18.1%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
15.6%
SEASON 16.4%
6.81
SEASON 6.59
YARDS / PLAY
6.12
SEASON 6.49
0.332
SEASON 0.214
EPA ALLOWED
0.346
SEASON 0.213
48.0%
SEASON 44.0%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
43.8%
SEASON 37.6%
15.6%
SEASON 14.2%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
16.4%
SEASON 14.5%
14.3%
SEASON 13.5%
STUFF RATE
8.3%
SEASON 16.0%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2022 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 6 FIELD n=57
MARKET
TOTAL72.5
SPREADUTSA -6.5
IMPLIED — WKU33.0
IMPLIED — UTSA39.5
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
67FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
1 / 57
BY ENVIRONMENT
7 / 57
DISAGREEMENT6 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 6 positions on a 57-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
MIDDLING × FAST
WKU PACE26.7s
55
UTSA PACE24.4s
92
SHARED PACE25.6s
74
PLAY VOLUME141
74
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
WKU81CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
91
PROE
97
TEMPO
55
EXPLOSIVE91p
91
PROE97p
97
TEMPO55p
55
UTSA62CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
28
PROE
66
TEMPO
92
EXPLOSIVE28p
28
PROE66p
66
TEMPO92p
92
IS THE RECORD REAL2022 · FULL SEASON
WKURECORD UNDERSTATES
8-5ACTUALvs9.5-3.5FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-1.5 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-3
POINT MARGIN / GAME+12.4
WESTERN KENTUCKY won 8 of 13 against a scoring profile describing 9.5. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
UTSARECORD OVERSTATES
11-2ACTUALvs9.2-3.8FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+1.8 W
ONE SCORE RECORD5-1
POINT MARGIN / GAME+12.2
UTSA won 11 of 13 against a scoring profile describing 9.2. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERWESTERN KENTUCKYUTSA2022 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Bailey ZappeQB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
RB0%Adam CofieldRB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
WR/TE0%Ben RatzlaffWR · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION5 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%DeAngelo MaloneDE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%Malik StaplesLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB0%Omari AlexanderDB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION5 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBCaden Veltkamp · SIGNEE ★3Turner Helton · SIGNEEINTACT
RBLT Sanders · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
WR/TEQuinton Henry · SIGNEE ★3Easton Messer · SIGNEE ★2INTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLKeaton Law · SIGNEE ★3Deante McCray · SIGNEE ★3Reid Jamerson · SIGNEEINTACT
LBAnthony Brackenridge · SIGNEE ★3Trent Zappe · SIGNEEINTACT
DBDarius Thomas · SIGNEE ★3Robert Harris · SIGNEE ★3Alexander Ford · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · WESTERN KENTUCKY
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB757590043 OF 4 GRADED
RB5555623565 OF 6 GRADED
WR/TE777736622116 OF 21 GRADED
OL76766701713 OF 17 GRADED
DL474734751412 OF 14 GRADED
LB525250651915 OF 19 GRADED
DB636360622218 OF 22 GRADED
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE42nd42
BLUE-CHIP RATIO8%51
RECRUITING CLASS#94 · 0/22 BC30
CLASS RANK TREND-14 · 3 CYCLES22
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 4th YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX27%58
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
UTSAJEFF TRAYLOR3TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
7474
PACE
9696
PASS RATE
6565
EXPLOSIVENESS
6969
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
6666
HAVOC
9898
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
WKUTYSON HELTON4TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
9696
PACE
5656
PASS RATE
9292
EXPLOSIVENESS
8181
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
6868
HAVOC
1919
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESWKU OFFENSEUTSA OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBWESTERN KENTUCKY OFFENSE
NATIONAL
17OF 131
TAL
90
PERF
75
RET
0
NATIONAL
80OF 131
RET
0
FULL DEFENSEUTSA DEFENSE
WKU QUARTERBACKSn=4100% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
AUSTIN REEDQBRET
524TH YR10092★4+25
DARIUS OCEANQBRET
491ST YR2611★2—
CADEN VELTKAMPQBTRUE FR
433RD YR917★3—
TURNER HELTONQBTRUE FR
373RD YR—9★3—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
UTSA DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 52 PLAYERS26% VACATED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
4866%0%
LINEBACKERSLB
4796%11%
SECONDARYDB
5972%0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLWESTERN KENTUCKY OFFENSE
NATIONAL
3OF 131
TAL
67
PERF
76
RET
0
DL
78OF 131
DL RET
66
LB
69OF 131
LB RET
96
FRONT-7UTSA DEFENSE
WKU OFFENSIVE LINEn=17100% VACATED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
GUNNER BRITTONOLRET
884TH YR9995★4+13
QUANTAVIOUS LESLIEOLRET
894TH YR9977★3+43
RUSTY STAATSOLRET
844TH YR9978★3+36
VINCENT MURPHYOLTRUE FR
824TH YR9964★3+40
MICHAEL ONDELACYOLRET
504TH YR22—UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
UTSA FRONT-7n=33 · 2 ROOMS22% VACATED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
NICK BOOKER-BROWNDLTRUE FR
793RD YR6653★3+22
TREY MOORELBRET
734TH YR8998★4+17
CHRISTIAN CLAYTONDLRET
674TH YR5213★2—
BRANDON MATTERSONDLRET
644TH YR4631★3—
TAI LEONARDDLTRUE FR
563RD YR4759★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBWESTERN KENTUCKY OFFENSE
NATIONAL
55OF 131
TAL
62
PERF
55
RET
35
DL
78OF 131
DL RET
66
LB
69OF 131
LB RET
96
FRONT-7UTSA DEFENSE
WKU RUNNING BACKSn=665% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
KYE ROBICHAUXRBRET
644TH YR6685★3+26
LT SANDERSRBTRUE FR
524TH YR5336★3+34
MARKESE STEPPRBTRUE FR
494TH YR4478★3-1
JAKAIRI MOSESRBRET
463RD YR438★2+4
DAVION ERVIN-POINDEXTERRBTRUE FR
454TH YR81—UNR-13
SHOW ALL 6
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
UTSA FRONT-72 ROOMS · 33 PLAYERS21% VACATED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.554866%0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.454796%11%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEWESTERN KENTUCKY OFFENSE
NATIONAL
2OF 131
TAL
36
PERF
77
RET
62
DB
28OF 131
DB RET
72
SECONDARYUTSA DEFENSE
WKU PASS CATCHERSn=2138% VACATED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JOSHUA SIMONTERET
854TH YR6195★4+46
MALACHI CORLEYWRRET
783RD YR9913★2+37
JOEY BELJANTERET
754TH YR5945★3+46
DAEWOOD DAVISWRRET
674TH YR9654★3+27
JAYLEN HALLWRTRUE FR
604TH YR10034★3+15
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
UTSA SECONDARYn=19 · 1 ROOM28% VACATED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
COREY MAYFIELD JR.CBRET
864TH YR9833★3+0
CLIFFORD CHATTMANSRET
684TH YR9764★3-1
XAVIER PLAYERCBRET
522ND YR3541★3—
ZAH FRAZIERCBTRUE FR
523RD YR25—UNR—
JALEN RAINEYSTRUE FR
522ND YR1836★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
WKU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
UTSA
SCOUT TEAM GRADE
63.1
58.1
— OFFENSE
72.1
65.0
— DEFENSE
54.1
51.3
SP+ OVERALL
1.7
7.2
FPI
5.1
3.3
ELO
1693
1658
TALENT
496
516
PRODUCTION
50
64
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−11
−21
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.08
0.03
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
WKU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
UTSA
OFF EFFICIENCY
68
88
DEF EFFICIENCY
44
90
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
90
29
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
90
2
FINISHING DRIVES
15
36
FIELD POSITION
51
27
TURNOVER MARGIN
94
52
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
WKU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
UTSA
PASS RATE
61.3%
50.3%
PROE
+12.5
+3.5
PACE
26.7s
24.4s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
35%
29%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
45.2%
55.1%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
75.4%
63.6%
PLAYS / GAME
67.4
73.8
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.6%
0.6%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = WKU, ORANGE = UTSA) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2022, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE