SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2022 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2022›WEEK 9›TEM @ NAVY›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
UL @ USM74
ECU @ BYU73
OKST @ KSU73
ARK @ AUB71
OU @ ISU71
TCU @ WVU70
MSU @ MICH69
NU @ IOWA67
USF @ HOU66
ILL @ NEB65
BAY @ TTU65
SMU @ TLSA64
PITT @ UNC64
FLA @ UGA62
MIZ @ SC62
UTAH @ WSU61
RUTG @ MINN61
USA @ ARST60
USC @ ARIZ60
ODU @ GAST59
UK @ TENN59
GT @ FSU58
WAKE @ LOU58
VT @ NCSU57
ND @ SYR57
MIA @ UVA57
MISS @ TA&M57
CIN @ UCF56
OSU @ PSU55
CCU @ MRSH55
CSU @ BOIS54
UAB @ FAU53
BC @ CONN52
UNT @ WKU51
TOL @ EMU50
NMSU @ MASS49
STAN @ UCLA48
SDSU @ FRES46
ASU @ COLO45
ORE @ CAL44
TEM @ NAVY42
MTSU @ UTEP37
WYO @ HAW35
M-OH @ AKR34
NEV @ SJSU34
CLT @ RICE29
LT @ FIU28
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
TEMPLE
NAVY
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2022
SAT 15:30 ET|NAVY-MARINE CORPS MEMORIAL STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP45|O/U41.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
111FPI
TEMAACTEMPLE
20
3-9
45
30
45
71%
46
44
13.5
—
+14.5
HOME
—AP
79FPI
NAVYAACNAVY
27
4-8
0
26
50
24%
58
77
28.0
—
-14.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2022CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALTEM20—NAVY27
CLOSED NAVY -14.5TOTAL 41.5TEM COVERED · 47 POINTS · OVER
TEM
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
NAVY
20
POINTS
27
288
TOTAL YARDS
224
268 (24-48)
PASSING
0 (0-2)
20 (20)
RUSHING
224 (70)
14
FIRST DOWNS
12
4-16
THIRD DOWN
8-21
1-3
FOURTH DOWN
2-4
22:51
TIME OF POSS.
37:09
5-35
PENALTIES
2-10
3
TURNOVERS
1
1
SACKS
4
1
QB HURRIES
7
TEM
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
NAVY
0.049
SEASON 0.165
EPA / PLAY
-0.044
SEASON 0.136
33.3%
SEASON 38.0%
SUCCESS RATE
31.9%
SEASON 37.0%
8.3%
SEASON 12.9%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
4.3%
SEASON 12.2%
4.95
SEASON 5.64
YARDS / PLAY
3.32
SEASON 5.05
-0.044
SEASON 0.223
EPA ALLOWED
0.049
SEASON 0.252
31.9%
SEASON 43.8%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
33.3%
SEASON 39.1%
4.3%
SEASON 14.8%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
8.3%
SEASON 15.0%
15.2%
SEASON 15.4%
STUFF RATE
21.4%
SEASON 20.1%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2022 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 9 FIELD n=47
MARKET
TOTAL41.5
SPREADNAVY -14.5
IMPLIED — TEM13.5
IMPLIED — NAVY28.0
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
44FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
43 / 47
BY ENVIRONMENT
31 / 47
DISAGREEMENT12 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 12 positions on a 47-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
MIDDLING × MIDDLING
TEM PACE27.1s
46
NAVY PACE26.6s
58
SHARED PACE26.9s
52
PLAY VOLUME134
52
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
TEM75CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
85
PROE
93
TEMPO
46
EXPLOSIVE85p
85
PROE93p
93
TEMPO46p
46
NAVY32CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
39
PROE
0
TEMPO
58
EXPLOSIVE39p
39
PROE0p
0
TEMPO58p
58
IS THE RECORD REAL2022 · FULL SEASON
TEMRECORD UNDERSTATES
3-9ACTUALvs4.0-8.0FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-1.0 W
ONE SCORE RECORD0-4
POINT MARGIN / GAME-7.3
TEMPLE won 3 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 4.0. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
NAVYRECORD UNDERSTATES
4-8ACTUALvs5.3-6.7FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-1.3 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-5
POINT MARGIN / GAME-2.4
NAVY won 4 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 5.3. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERTEMPLENAVY2022 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%Kyle DobbinsRB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
WR/TE0%Justin LynchPORTAL · NORTHERN ILLINOIS · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%Joseph HooperOL · SHARE NOT MEASURED
DL0%Nick BagsPORTAL · SOUTH FLORIDA · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%William KwenkeuLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB0%Garrett WilliamsDB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION6 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBSam Martin Jr. · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
WR/TEJohnny Pergine · SIGNEEINTACT
OLJackson Pruitt · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DLZamar Grove · SIGNEE ★3Aaron Jones · SIGNEE ★3Jacob Porter · SIGNEEINTACT
LBCorey Yeoman · SIGNEE ★3Darrien Lewis · SIGNEE ★2Antwone Santiago · SIGNEEINTACT
DBLondon Hall · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · TEMPLE
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB747446042 OF 4 GRADED
RB3131336974 OF 7 GRADED
WR/TE636339742615 OF 26 GRADED
OL525225141810 OF 18 GRADED
DL555550901412 OF 14 GRADED
LB71713284169 OF 16 GRADED
DB474732682318 OF 23 GRADED
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE45th45
BLUE-CHIP RATIO4%33
RECRUITING CLASS#95 · 0/12 BC29
CLASS RANK TREND+2 · 3 CYCLES54
COACH STATUSNEW HEAD COACH—
DEV TRANSITION MIX31%73
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
NAVYKEN NIUMATALOLO7TH SEASON3 SEASONS · 2 PROGRAMMES
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
2929
PACE
4848
PASS RATE
3636
EXPLOSIVENESS
5151
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
5555
HAVOC
6767
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
TEMSTAN DRAYTONFIRST SEASON3 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
8989
PACE
5858
PASS RATE
9898
EXPLOSIVENESS
8888
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
8484
HAVOC
1313
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESTEM OFFENSENAVY OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBTEMPLE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
21OF 131
TAL
46
PERF
74
RET
0
NATIONAL
63OF 131
RET
0
FULL DEFENSENAVY DEFENSE
TEM QUARTERBACKSn=4100% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
E.J. WARNERQBTRUE FR
504TH YR9245★30
QUINCY PATTERSONQBTRUE FR
464TH YR2289★4-24
MARIANO VALENTIQBRET
352ND YR—29★3—
T.J. PERGINEQBRET
303RD YR——UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
NAVY DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 74 PLAYERS11% VACATED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
5280%0%
LINEBACKERSLB
6698%0%
SECONDARYDB
5691%0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLTEMPLE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
61OF 131
TAL
25
PERF
52
RET
14
DL
60OF 131
DL RET
80
LB
19OF 131
LB RET
98
FRONT-7NAVY DEFENSE
TEM OFFENSIVE LINEn=1886% VACATED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
ISAAC MOOREOLRET
444TH YR8515★2-34
BRYCE THOMANOLRET
423RD YR6430★3-12
VICTOR STOFFELOLRET
684TH YR6345★3+20
ADAM KLEINOLRET
614TH YR6824★3+30
LUKE FOSTEROLTRUE FR
514TH YR3223★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
NAVY FRONT-7n=51 · 2 ROOMS13% VACATED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JOHN MARSHALLLBRET
974TH YR92—UNR+23
COLIN RAMOSLBRET
744TH YR78—UNR-14
JUSTIN REEDDERET
674TH YR53—UNR—
EAVAN GIBBONSDERET
554TH YR82—UNR—
WILL HARBOURLBRET
504TH YR629★2+24
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBTEMPLE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
118OF 131
TAL
33
PERF
31
RET
69
DL
60OF 131
DL RET
80
LB
19OF 131
LB RET
98
FRONT-7NAVY DEFENSE
TEM RUNNING BACKSn=731% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TREY BLAIRRBRET
501ST YR2033★3-30
DARVON HUBBARDRBTRUE FR
434TH YR5778★3-13
JAKARI NORWOODRBTRUE FR
413RD YR4419★3-39
EDWARD SAYDEERBRET
404TH YR8923★3-10
QWENTIN ROSERBTRUE FR
302ND YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 7
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
NAVY FRONT-72 ROOMS · 51 PLAYERS12% VACATED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.555280%0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.456698%0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TETEMPLE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
27OF 131
TAL
39
PERF
63
RET
74
DB
43OF 131
DB RET
91
SECONDARYNAVY DEFENSE
TEM PASS CATCHERSn=2626% VACATED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
AMAD ANDERSON JR.WRRET
674TH YR7879★3+25
JOSE BARBONWRRET
664TH YR9912★2+22
ADONICAS SANDERSWRTRUE FR
534TH YR7962★3+16
JORDAN SMITHTERET
524TH YR74—UNR+29
DAVID MARTIN-ROBINSONTERET
504TH YR8437★3+4
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
NAVY SECONDARYn=23 · 1 ROOM9% VACATED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DASHAUN PEELECBTRUE FR
564TH YR44—UNR—
MARCUS MOORESRET
534TH YR409★2—
MATTHEW PETERSCBRET
524TH YR36—UNR—
RAYUAN LANE IIISRET
504TH YR92—UNR-14
XAVIER MCDONALDSRET
484TH YR2218★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
TEM
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
NAVY
SCOUT TEAM GRADE
57.0
51.1
— OFFENSE
56.7
44.3
— DEFENSE
57.2
58.0
SP+ OVERALL
-12.9
-7.2
FPI
-11.8
-3.5
ELO
1144
1457
TALENT
505
0
PRODUCTION
20
28
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+22
−28
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.04
0.00
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
TEM
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
NAVY
OFF EFFICIENCY
13
12
DEF EFFICIENCY
45
81
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
84
39
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
66
1
FINISHING DRIVES
34
20
FIELD POSITION
89
39
TURNOVER MARGIN
5
64
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
TEM
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
NAVY
PASS RATE
63.5%
16.7%
PROE
+10.8
−34.5
PACE
27.1s
26.6s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
29%
31%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
45.9%
87.7%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
80.9%
25.8%
PLAYS / GAME
66.5
67.6
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.4%
0.5%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = TEM, ORANGE = NAVY) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2022, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE