SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2022 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2022›WEEK 10›UTEP @ RICE›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
UK @ MIZ81
IOWA @ PUR81
APP @ CCU76
MD @ WIS75
ORST @ WASH73
JMU @ LOU73
MRSH @ ODU71
GAST @ USM71
TEX @ KSU70
HOU @ SMU70
FSU @ MIA69
MICH @ RUTG68
CLEM @ ND68
OSU @ NU67
BAY @ OU67
GT @ VT66
PSU @ IU66
TENN @ UGA66
USF @ TEM65
TROY @ UL65
UCLA @ ASU65
UCF @ MEM64
WSU @ STAN64
OKST @ KU64
UTSA @ UAB64
AF @ ARMY63
FLA @ TA&M61
WAKE @ NCSU61
UNC @ UVA60
MSU @ ILL60
SYR @ PITT60
TTU @ TCU58
WVU @ ISU58
ALA @ LSU58
DUKE @ BC57
USA @ GASO57
BYU @ BOIS57
SC @ VAN57
TULN @ TLSA55
AUB @ MSST55
MINN @ NEB54
CMU @ NIU52
NAVY @ CIN51
UNM @ USU50
CAL @ USC48
WMU @ BGSU47
ARIZ @ UTAH47
BUF @ OHIO46
BALL @ KENT45
ORE @ COLO45
MASS @ CONN44
UNLV @ SDSU43
LIB @ ARK42
TXST @ ULM41
MTSU @ LT38
HAW @ FRES38
UTEP @ RICE36
WKU @ CLT36
FIU @ UNT34
CSU @ SJSU33
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
UTEP
RICE
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2022
THU 19:00 ET|RICE STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP18|O/U47.0COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
108FPI
UTEPMWCUTEP
30
5-7
10
19
2
62%
35
24
21.8
—
+3.5
HOME
—AP
118FPI
RICEAACRICE
37
5-8
28
13
15
36%
26
49
25.3
—
-3.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2022CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALUTEP30—RICE37
CLOSED RICE -3.5TOTAL 47.0RICE COVERED · 67 POINTS · OVER
UTEP
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
RICE
30
POINTS
37
313
TOTAL YARDS
502
159 (15-28)
PASSING
334 (21-31)
154 (36)
RUSHING
168 (32)
15
FIRST DOWNS
21
9-16
THIRD DOWN
8-13
0-0
FOURTH DOWN
0-0
31:21
TIME OF POSS.
28:39
4-24
PENALTIES
5-40
0
TURNOVERS
2
2
SACKS
1
1
QB HURRIES
5
UTEP
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
RICE
0.282
SEASON 0.193
EPA / PLAY
0.471
SEASON 0.226
37.5%
SEASON 41.5%
SUCCESS RATE
49.2%
SEASON 41.5%
14.1%
SEASON 14.5%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
20.6%
SEASON 14.6%
5.70
SEASON 5.61
YARDS / PLAY
8.03
SEASON 5.82
0.471
SEASON 0.280
EPA ALLOWED
0.282
SEASON 0.304
49.2%
SEASON 43.5%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
37.5%
SEASON 42.6%
20.6%
SEASON 18.2%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
14.1%
SEASON 18.3%
6.7%
SEASON 15.3%
STUFF RATE
8.6%
SEASON 16.5%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2022 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 10 FIELD n=60
MARKET
TOTAL47.0
SPREADRICE -3.5
IMPLIED — UTEP21.8
IMPLIED — RICE25.3
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
48FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
45 / 60
BY ENVIRONMENT
36 / 60
DISAGREEMENT9 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 9 positions on a 60-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
MIDDLING × SLOW
UTEP PACE27.8s
35
RICE PACE28.1s
26
SHARED PACE27.9s
31
PLAY VOLUME129
31
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
UTEP47CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
59
PROE
48
TEMPO
35
EXPLOSIVE59p
59
PROE48p
48
TEMPO35p
35
RICE41CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
62
PROE
36
TEMPO
26
EXPLOSIVE62p
62
PROE36p
36
TEMPO26p
26
IS THE RECORD REAL2022 · FULL SEASON
UTEPRECORD MATCHES
5-7ACTUALvs5.3-6.7FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.3 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME-2.6
UTEP won 5 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 5.3. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
RICERECORD MATCHES
5-7ACTUALvs4.0-8.0FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+1.0 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-3
POINT MARGIN / GAME-8.5
RICE won 5 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 4.0. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERUTEPRICE2022 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Isaiah BravoQB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
RB0%Quardraiz WadleyRB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
WR/TE0%Nick AstWR · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%Darta LeeOL · SHARE NOT MEASURED
DL0%Josh OrtegaDT · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
LB0%Connor HelsiusLB · SHARE NOT MEASURED
DB0%Walter Neil Jr.CB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBJake McNamara · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
RBMichael Whitaker · SIGNEEINTACT
WR/TESam Mikaele · SIGNEE ★3Luke Seib · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLTrevion Mitchell · SIGNEE ★3AJ Barton · SIGNEEAJ Barton · SIGNEEINTACT
DLLogologo Va'a · SIGNEE ★2INTACT
LBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
DBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · UTEP
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB33331010052 OF 5 GRADED
RB4949279998 OF 9 GRADED
WR/TE464633662412 OF 24 GRADED
OL696949221614 OF 16 GRADED
DL666614931914 OF 19 GRADED
LB74741982116 OF 11 GRADED
DB363660402416 OF 24 GRADED
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE10th10
BLUE-CHIP RATIO0%4
RECRUITING CLASS#129 · 0/10 BC4
CLASS RANK TREND+2 · 3 CYCLES54
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 5th YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX37%88
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
RICEMIKE BLOOMGREN5TH SEASON2 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
9797
PACE
2222
PASS RATE
9696
EXPLOSIVENESS
9393
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
4141
HAVOC
5757
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
UTEPDANA DIMEL5TH SEASON1 SEASON · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
1616
PACE
4141
PASS RATE
3939
EXPLOSIVENESS
6464
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
8585
HAVOC
3636
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESUTEP OFFENSERICE OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBUTEP OFFENSE
NATIONAL
118OF 131
TAL
10
PERF
33
RET
100
NATIONAL
111OF 131
RET
0
FULL DEFENSERICE DEFENSE
UTEP QUARTERBACKSn=50% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CALVIN BROWNHOLTZQBRET
573RD YR4510★2+5
GAVIN HARDISONQBRET
404TH YR80—UNR+8
JAKE MCNAMARAQBTRUE FR
352ND YR—33★3—
CADE MCCONNELLQBTRUE FR
354TH YR—73★3—
ZACH RODRIGUEZQBRET
303RD YR——UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RICE DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 46 PLAYERS27% VACATED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
6651%0%
LINEBACKERSLB
7066%0%
SECONDARYDB
4686%5%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLUTEP OFFENSE
NATIONAL
15OF 131
TAL
49
PERF
69
RET
22
DL
21OF 131
DL RET
51
LB
16OF 131
LB RET
66
FRONT-7RICE DEFENSE
UTEP OFFENSIVE LINEn=1678% VACATED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
STEVEN HUBBARDOLRET
804TH YR7664★3+15
JUSTIN MAYERSOLRET
604TH YR8885★3+19
TRISTIN TUIALUULUUOLRET
343RD YR51★2—
JEREMIAH BYERSOLRET
894TH YR8797★4+41
ALUMA NKELEOLTRUE FR
524TH YR2264★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RICE FRONT-7n=24 · 2 ROOMS43% VACATED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TREY SCHUMANDERET
694TH YR585★2+48
MYRON MORRISONLBRET
574TH YR8213★2-7
KENNY SEYMOURDLRET
524TH YR3440★3—
DEMONE GREENDLTRUE FR
523RD YR1730★3—
KENNETH ORJILBRET
524TH YR5323★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBUTEP OFFENSE
NATIONAL
86OF 131
TAL
27
PERF
49
RET
99
DL
21OF 131
DL RET
51
LB
16OF 131
LB RET
66
FRONT-7RICE DEFENSE
UTEP RUNNING BACKSn=91% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JAMES TUPOUFBRET
584TH YR22★2—
DEION HANKINSRBRET
494TH YR8664★3-19
TORRANCE BURGESS JR.RBTRUE FR
484TH YR1545★3—
REYNALDO FLORESRBRET
464TH YR50—UNR+18
RONALD AWATTRBRET
444TH YR912★2-10
SHOW ALL 9
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RICE FRONT-72 ROOMS · 24 PLAYERS42% VACATED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.556651%0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.457066%0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEUTEP OFFENSE
NATIONAL
93OF 131
TAL
33
PERF
46
RET
66
DB
95OF 131
DB RET
86
SECONDARYRICE DEFENSE
UTEP PASS CATCHERSn=2434% VACATED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TYRIN SMITHWRRET
704TH YR9845★3+32
TRENT THOMPSONTERET
604TH YR600★2+52
MARCUS BELLONWRTRUE FR
494TH YR46—UNR—
JOSH FARRWRRET
493RD YR22—UNR—
LUKE SOTOTERET
484TH YR3—★2—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RICE SECONDARYn=22 · 1 ROOM14% VACATED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
GEORGE NYAKWOLSRET
824TH YR7126★3+7
TRE'SHON DEVONESCBRET
534TH YR4864★3—
DAVEON HOOKSTRUE FR
524TH YR4013★2—
CHIKE ANIGBOGUSRET
524TH YR271★2—
GABRIEL TAYLORSRET
494TH YR9171★3+23
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
UTEP
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
RICE
SCOUT TEAM GRADE
54.1
53.5
— OFFENSE
49.9
46.5
— DEFENSE
58.3
60.5
SP+ OVERALL
-10.7
-15.2
FPI
-11.4
-14.1
ELO
1304
1057
TALENT
289
442
PRODUCTION
25
12
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−20
+13
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.00
0.03
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
UTEP
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
RICE
OFF EFFICIENCY
42
40
DEF EFFICIENCY
48
39
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
58
62
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
10
2
FINISHING DRIVES
9
37
FIELD POSITION
92
79
TURNOVER MARGIN
33
3
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
UTEP
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
RICE
PASS RATE
52.3%
49.0%
PROE
+0.2
−2.4
PACE
27.8s
28.1s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
31%
35%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
56.2%
60.0%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
68.4%
67.5%
PLAYS / GAME
64.8
64.0
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
0.6%
2.6%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = UTEP, ORANGE = RICE) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2022, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE