SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2022 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2022›WEEK 1›CIN @ LOU›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
UNC @ APP78
ARMY @ CCU77
ILL @ IU74
LIB @ USM72
HOU @ UTSA71
ORE @ UGA71
LSU @ FSU71
PSU @ PUR70
MTSU @ JMU67
CSU @ MICH65
BYU @ USF65
BOIS @ ORST65
TCU @ COLO64
UTAH @ FLA64
ULM @ TEX64
BALL @ TENN63
BUF @ MD63
SMU @ UNT63
USU @ ALA63
ND @ OSU62
TEM @ DUKE60
TLSA @ WYO60
M-OH @ UK60
CLEM @ GT60
NMSU @ MINN59
RUTG @ BC58
UTEP @ OU58
KENT @ WASH58
WVU @ PITT57
MASS @ TULN57
LT @ MIZ56
CMU @ OKST53
CIN @ ARK53
LOU @ SYR52
RICE @ USC51
FAU @ OHIO50
VT @ ODU47
MEM @ MSST47
GAST @ SC47
BGSU @ UCLA46
TROY @ MISS45
TXST @ NEV44
NCSU @ ECU42
ARIZ @ SDSU39
WMU @ MSU37
WKU @ HAW30
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
CINCINNATI
LOUISVILLE
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2022
SAT 11:00 ET|FENWAY PARKNONCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP8|O/U38.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
40FPI
CINB12CINCINNATI
7
9-4
65
40
82
27%
26
34
18.0
—
+2.5
HOME
—AP
22FPI
LOUACCLOUISVILLE
24
8-5
57
42
80
64%
43
64
20.5
—
-2.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2022CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALCIN7—LOU24
CLOSED LOU -2.5TOTAL 38.5LOU COVERED · 31 POINTS · UNDER
CIN
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
LOU
7
POINTS
24
127
TOTAL YARDS
419
83 (7-15)
PASSING
132 (13-23)
44 (38)
RUSHING
287 (49)
10
FIRST DOWNS
24
2-13
THIRD DOWN
7-14
1-2
FOURTH DOWN
1-1
27:31
TIME OF POSS.
32:03
3-25
PENALTIES
5-25
2
TURNOVERS
4
1
SACKS
7
0
QB HURRIES
0
CIN
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
LOU
-0.220
SEASON 0.242
EPA / PLAY
0.291
SEASON 0.185
26.9%
SEASON 42.4%
SUCCESS RATE
42.6%
SEASON 41.4%
11.5%
SEASON 16.0%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
16.2%
SEASON 16.2%
2.35
SEASON 6.01
YARDS / PLAY
6.47
SEASON 6.04
0.291
SEASON 0.108
EPA ALLOWED
-0.220
SEASON 0.162
42.6%
SEASON 38.4%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
26.9%
SEASON 43.1%
16.2%
SEASON 12.3%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
11.5%
SEASON 17.5%
21.7%
SEASON 13.9%
STUFF RATE
16.7%
SEASON 21.0%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2022 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 1 FIELD n=46
MARKET
TOTAL38.5
SPREADLOU -2.5
IMPLIED — CIN18.0
IMPLIED — LOU20.5
PACE COLLISION
SLOW × MIDDLING
CIN PACE28.2s
26
LOU PACE27.4s
43
SHARED PACE27.8s
34
PLAY VOLUME130
34
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
CIN58CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
70
PROE
78
TEMPO
26
EXPLOSIVE70p
70
PROE78p
78
TEMPO26p
26
LOU49CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
84
PROE
21
TEMPO
43
EXPLOSIVE84p
84
PROE21p
21
TEMPO43p
43
IS THE RECORD REAL2022 · FULL SEASON
CINRECORD MATCHES
9-3ACTUALvs8.8-3.2FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.2 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-3
POINT MARGIN / GAME+10.8
CINCINNATI won 9 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 8.8. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
LOURECORD UNDERSTATES
7-5ACTUALvs8.0-4.0FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-1.0 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+7.0
LOUISVILLE won 7 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 8.0. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERCINCINNATILOUISVILLE2022 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Desmond RidderQB · SHARE NOT MEASURED
RB0%Jerome FordRB · SHARE NOT MEASURED
WR/TE0%Noah DavisTE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%John WilliamsOL · SHARE NOT MEASURED
DL0%Miles ManigaultDL · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%Joel DublankoLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
DB0%Coby BryantCB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBLuther Richesson · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
RBStephan Byrd · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
WR/TEJoJo Bermudez · SIGNEE ★3Marcus Peterson · SIGNEE ★3Quincy Burroughs · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLEthan Green · SIGNEE ★3Luke Dalton · SIGNEE ★3Jonathan Harder · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DLMario Eugenio · SIGNEE ★4Derrick Shepard Jr. · SIGNEE ★4CJ Doggette Jr. · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
LBJonathan Thompson · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DBJQ Hardaway · SIGNEE ★4Oliver Bridges · SIGNEE ★3Kalen Carroll · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · CINCINNATI
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB363685041 OF 4 GRADED
RB4949727685 OF 8 GRADED
WR/TE595965872414 OF 24 GRADED
OL54544801911 OF 19 GRADED
DL515130741610 OF 16 GRADED
LB666676711510 OF 15 GRADED
DB505058942213 OF 22 GRADED
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE65th65
BLUE-CHIP RATIO14%67
RECRUITING CLASS#42 · 3/20 BC69
CLASS RANK TREND-2 · 3 CYCLES46
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 6th YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX13%10
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
LOUSCOTT SATTERFIELD4TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 2 PROGRAMMES
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
3838
PACE
5151
PASS RATE
3737
EXPLOSIVENESS
6969
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
7070
HAVOC
6666
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
CINLUKE FICKELL6TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 2 PROGRAMMES
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
5252
PACE
2424
PASS RATE
5353
EXPLOSIVENESS
1515
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
2525
HAVOC
3434
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESCIN OFFENSELOU OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBCINCINNATI OFFENSE
NATIONAL
111OF 131
TAL
85
PERF
36
RET
0
NATIONAL
8OF 131
RET
0
FULL DEFENSELOUISVILLE DEFENSE
CIN QUARTERBACKSn=4100% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
BEN BRYANTQBTRUE FR
584TH YR8285★3+24
BRADY LICHTENBERGQBRET
374TH YR—51★3—
LUTHER RICHESSONQBTRUE FR
353RD YR——★3—
JACOB HOYINGQBTRUE FR
303RD YR——UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LOU DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 55 PLAYERS31% VACATED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
7790%6%
LINEBACKERSLB
8778%5%
SECONDARYDB
5355%5%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLCINCINNATI OFFENSE
NATIONAL
58OF 131
TAL
48
PERF
54
RET
0
DL
4OF 131
DL RET
90
LB
1OF 131
LB RET
78
FRONT-7LOUISVILLE DEFENSE
CIN OFFENSIVE LINEn=19100% VACATED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
GAVIN GERHARDTOLRET
634TH YR8954★3+10
JAMES TUNSTALLOLTRUE FR
634TH YR8610★2-15
JOE HUBEROLRET
494TH YR8985★3-18
DARTANYAN TINSLEYOLTRUE FR
404TH YR1162★3—
JEREMY COOPEROLRET
894TH YR6837★3+44
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LOU FRONT-7n=36 · 2 ROOMS15% VACATED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
YASIR ABDULLAHLBRET
874TH YR9463★3+24
YAYA DIABYDLRET
784TH YR76—UNR+40
MOMO SANOGOLBTRUE FR
754TH YR9381★3+11
JARED DAWSONDLRET
754TH YR5964★3-2
MONTY MONTGOMERYLBRET
704TH YR8495★4+22
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBCINCINNATI OFFENSE
NATIONAL
83OF 131
TAL
72
PERF
49
RET
76
DL
4OF 131
DL RET
90
LB
1OF 131
LB RET
78
FRONT-7LOUISVILLE DEFENSE
CIN RUNNING BACKSn=824% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
RYAN MONTGOMERYRBRET
644TH YR6349★3+9
ETHAN WRIGHTRBRET
524TH YR2259★3+33
CHARLES MCCLELLANDRBRET
474TH YR88—UNR+30
MYLES MONTGOMERYRBRET
464TH YR3189★3+41
COREY KINERRBTRUE FR
454TH YR7094★4-28
SHOW ALL 8
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LOU FRONT-72 ROOMS · 36 PLAYERS15% VACATED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.557790%6%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.458778%5%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TECINCINNATI OFFENSE
NATIONAL
42OF 131
TAL
65
PERF
59
RET
87
DB
61OF 131
DB RET
55
SECONDARYLOUISVILLE DEFENSE
CIN PASS CATCHERSn=2413% VACATED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TYLER SCOTTWRRET
813RD YR9456★3+30
TRE TUCKERWRRET
634TH YR9046★3+23
CHAMON METAYERTERET
594TH YR3978★3—
JOSH WHYLETERET
584TH YR8482★3+16
PAYTEN SINGLETARYTERET
524TH YR3140★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LOU SECONDARYn=19 · 1 ROOM45% VACATED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JARVIS BROWNLEE JR.DBTRUE FR
693RD YR9780★3-35
KEI'TREL CLARKDBRET
603RD YR95—UNR-16
KENDERICK DUNCANDBRET
564TH YR6785★3+20
NICARIO HARPERDBTRUE FR
524TH YR3085★3—
D'ANGELO HUTCHINSONSTRUE FR
524TH YR2354★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
CIN
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
LOU
SCOUT TEAM GRADE
52.9
66.0
— OFFENSE
50.1
59.7
— DEFENSE
55.6
72.2
SP+ OVERALL
13.1
9.0
FPI
6.5
10.7
ELO
1690
1753
TALENT
651
625
PRODUCTION
82
71
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−19
−16
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.14
0.09
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
CIN
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
LOU
OFF EFFICIENCY
35
36
DEF EFFICIENCY
89
69
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
70
83
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
56
61
FINISHING DRIVES
45
35
FIELD POSITION
56
39
TURNOVER MARGIN
60
77
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
CIN
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
LOU
PASS RATE
54.5%
45.9%
PROE
+5.5
−5.0
PACE
28.2s
27.4s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
20%
27%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
51.3%
60.7%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
66.3%
59.1%
PLAYS / GAME
63.9
65.7
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
0.1%
0.0%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = CIN, ORANGE = LOU) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2022, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE