SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2016 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2016›WEEK 1›GT @ BC›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
UCLA @ TA&M75
SC @ VAN73
MISS @ FSU69
LSU @ WIS68
SJSU @ TLSA68
CLEM @ AUB68
ND @ TEX68
CLT @ LOU66
ORST @ MINN66
RICE @ WKU64
HAW @ MICH64
LT @ ARK64
WMU @ NU63
RUTG @ WASH63
UGA @ UNC63
OU @ HOU62
BGSU @ OSU62
USC @ ALA62
TULN @ WAKE59
IU @ FIU59
NIU @ WYO59
GT @ BC57
MIZ @ WVU56
KENT @ PSU56
TOL @ ARST55
BYU @ ARIZ55
M-OH @ IOWA54
USM @ UK54
CSU @ COLO53
SMU @ UNT53
BALL @ GAST52
MASS @ FLA51
BOIS @ UL50
APP @ TENN46
ARMY @ TEM45
USA @ MSST44
TXST @ OHIO43
NMSU @ UTEP43
KSU @ STAN36
FRES @ NEB34
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
GEORGIA TECH
BOSTON COLLEGE
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2016
SAT 07:30 ET|AVIVA STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP7|O/UCOLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
46FPI
GTACCGEORGIA TECH
17
8-4
63
93
25
88%
3
88
0.0
—
-3.0
HOME
—AP
75FPI
BCACCBOSTON COLLEGE
14
6-6
56
0
95
92%
25
51
0.0
—
+3.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2016CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALGT17—BC14
CLOSED GT -3.0TOTAL —SPREAD PUSHED
GT
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
BC
17
POINTS
14
238
TOTAL YARDS
320
119 (8-15)
PASSING
144 (11-17)
119 (44)
RUSHING
176 (37)
12
FIRST DOWNS
15
6-15
THIRD DOWN
6-14
2-2
FOURTH DOWN
0-0
30:18
TIME OF POSS.
29:42
3-29
PENALTIES
7-39
1
TURNOVERS
3
1
SACKS
1
0
QB HURRIES
1
GT
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
BC
—
SEASON 0.339
EPA / PLAY
—
SEASON 0.029
—
SEASON 44.7%
SUCCESS RATE
—
SEASON 31.8%
—
SEASON 19.9%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
—
SEASON 11.7%
—
SEASON 7.15
YARDS / PLAY
—
SEASON 4.35
—
SEASON 0.275
EPA ALLOWED
—
SEASON 0.130
—
SEASON 48.5%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
—
SEASON 35.5%
—
SEASON 14.8%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
—
SEASON 13.7%
—
SEASON 13.9%
STUFF RATE
—
SEASON 22.9%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT4 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 1 FIELD n=40
MARKET
TOTAL—
SPREADGT -3.0
IMPLIED — GT—
IMPLIED — BC—
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
40FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY ENVIRONMENT
29 / 40
DISAGREEMENT—One of the two rankings could not be computed for this game, so there is no distance between them to state.
PACE COLLISION
SLOW × SLOW
GT PACE32.1s
3
BC PACE27.5s
25
SHARED PACE29.8s
14
PLAY VOLUME122
14
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
GT38CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
73
TEMPO
3
EXPLOSIVE73p
73
TEMPO3p
3
BC26CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
28
TEMPO
25
EXPLOSIVE28p
28
TEMPO25p
25
IS THE RECORD REAL2016 · FULL SEASON
GTRECORD OVERSTATES
8-4ACTUALvs6.8-5.2FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+1.2 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-1
POINT MARGIN / GAME+2.8
GEORGIA TECH won 8 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 6.8. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
BCRECORD OVERSTATES
6-6ACTUALvs4.3-7.7FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+1.7 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME-5.5
BOSTON COLLEGE won 6 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 4.3. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERGEORGIA TECHBOSTON COLLEGE2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
LB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TENO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
LBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · GEORGIA TECH
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB————5CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB————3CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————14CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————19CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————18CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————12CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————15CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE63rd63
BLUE-CHIP RATIO6%55
RECRUITING CLASS#60 · 0/17 BC56
COACH STATUS——
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
BCSTEVE ADDAZIOFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
GTPAUL JOHNSONFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESGT OFFENSEBC OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBGEORGIA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSEBOSTON COLLEGE DEFENSE
GT QUARTERBACKSn=5RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JUSTIN THOMASQBTRUE FR
————★2—
TAQUON MARSHALLQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
MATTHEW JORDANQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
JAY JONESQBTRUE FR
————★3—
CHASE MARTENSONQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
BC DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 37 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLGEORGIA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7BOSTON COLLEGE DEFENSE
GT OFFENSIVE LINEn=19RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TREY KLOCKOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
ANDREW MARSHALLOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
CHRIS GRIFFINOLTRUE FR
————UNR—
SCOTT MORGANOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
BAILEY IVEMEYEROLTRUE FR
—3RD YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
BC FRONT-7n=23 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JACK COTTRELLDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
KEVIN KAVALECDETRUE FR
————UNR—
TRUMAN GUTAPFELDTTRUE FR
————UNR—
TANNER KARAFADLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
HAROLD LANDRYDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBGEORGIA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7BOSTON COLLEGE DEFENSE
GT RUNNING BACKSn=3RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DEDRICK MILLSRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
LYNN GRFFINRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
NATHAN COTTRELLRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
BC FRONT-72 ROOMS · 23 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEGEORGIA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYBOSTON COLLEGE DEFENSE
GT PASS CATCHERSn=14RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MIKELL LANDS-DAVISWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
CHRISTIAN PHILPOTTWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
RICKY JEUNEWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
BRAD STEWARTWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
OMAHRI JARRETTWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
BC SECONDARYn=14 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
ATEM NTANTANGDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
MEHDI EL ATTRACHDBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
GABRIEL MCCLARYDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
ISAAC YIADOMDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
KAMRIN MOOREDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
GT
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
BC
SP+ OVERALL
7.8
-1.6
FPI
7.4
-1.1
ELO
1634
1367
TALENT
583
533
PRODUCTION
63
43
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−2
+11
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.06
0.00
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
GT
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
BC
PASS RATE
22.6%
37.2%
PACE
32.1s
27.5s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
25%
16%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
85.1%
70.1%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
40.1%
49.8%
PLAYS / GAME
56.0
65.5
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.1%
3.7%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = GT, ORANGE = BC) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2016, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE