SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2016 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2016›WEEK 5›OU @ TCU›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
ORE @ WSU80
FLA @ VAN77
STAN @ WASH75
OHIO @ M-OH72
WIS @ MICH71
ASU @ USC70
WYO @ CSU70
WAKE @ NCSU69
LOU @ CLEM67
ORST @ COLO65
TENN @ UGA65
WMU @ CMU65
NU @ IOWA64
NAVY @ AF64
MINN @ PSU64
MIZ @ LSU64
UNC @ FSU63
TA&M @ SC63
RUTG @ OSU62
MIA @ GT62
ULM @ AUB62
OU @ TCU61
CONN @ HOU60
SJSU @ UNM60
UTAH @ CAL60
MEM @ MISS60
TOL @ BYU59
SMU @ TEM59
UK @ ALA59
ND @ SYR58
KSU @ WVU58
UCF @ ECU57
FAU @ FIU56
RICE @ USM56
USF @ CIN56
ARIZ @ UCLA56
MRSH @ PITT55
BUF @ BC54
GAST @ APP53
NIU @ BALL53
NEV @ HAW53
TEX @ OKST52
UVA @ DUKE52
TULN @ MASS52
UTEP @ LT52
USU @ BOIS52
UL @ NMSU50
EMU @ BGSU49
MSU @ IU48
AKR @ KENT43
PUR @ MD43
BAY @ ISU42
MTSU @ UNT40
ODU @ CLT39
SDSU @ USA39
ILL @ NEB36
FRES @ UNLV36
KU @ TTU35
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
OKLAHOMA
TCU
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2016
SAT 17:00 ET|AMON G. CARTER STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP9|O/U66.0COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#5AP
7FPI
OUSECOKLAHOMA
52
10-2
87
97
15
77%
79
64
34.8
—
-3.5
HOME
—AP
34FPI
TCUB12TCU
46
6-6
78
38
83
24%
83
67
31.3
—
+3.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2016CONSENSUS · TEAMRANKINGS
FINALOU52—TCU46
CLOSED OU -3.5TOTAL 66.0OU COVERED · 98 POINTS · OVER
OU
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
TCU
52
POINTS
46
534
TOTAL YARDS
514
274 (23-30)
PASSING
449 (26-45)
260 (48)
RUSHING
65 (29)
23
FIRST DOWNS
19
8-15
THIRD DOWN
8-17
0-0
FOURTH DOWN
0-2
34:42
TIME OF POSS.
25:18
5-54
PENALTIES
9-64
2
TURNOVERS
1
4
SACKS
2
1
QB HURRIES
0
OU
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
TCU
0.404
SEASON 0.440
EPA / PLAY
0.399
SEASON 0.230
43.6%
SEASON 52.0%
SUCCESS RATE
37.0%
SEASON 43.9%
16.7%
SEASON 19.3%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
20.5%
SEASON 16.9%
6.92
SEASON 7.79
YARDS / PLAY
7.25
SEASON 6.16
0.399
SEASON 0.272
EPA ALLOWED
0.404
SEASON 0.177
37.0%
SEASON 41.9%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
43.6%
SEASON 39.1%
20.5%
SEASON 16.0%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
16.7%
SEASON 13.2%
24.0%
SEASON 13.2%
STUFF RATE
19.6%
SEASON 15.3%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT4 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 5 FIELD n=58
MARKET
TOTAL66.0
SPREADOU -3.5
IMPLIED — OU34.8
IMPLIED — TCU31.3
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
64FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
2 / 3
BY ENVIRONMENT
10 / 58
DISAGREEMENT8 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 8 positions on a 58-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right. The market board is 3 games because 55 carry no published total, so the two are not the same field.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × FAST
OU PACE24.5s
79
TCU PACE24.2s
83
SHARED PACE24.3s
81
PLAY VOLUME148
81
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
OU85CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
91
TEMPO
79
EXPLOSIVE91p
91
TEMPO79p
79
TCU56CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
29
TEMPO
83
EXPLOSIVE29p
29
TEMPO83p
83
IS THE RECORD REAL2016 · FULL SEASON
OURECORD OVERSTATES
10-2ACTUALvs8.7-3.3FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+1.3 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-0
POINT MARGIN / GAME+15.0
OKLAHOMA won 10 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 8.7. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TCURECORD MATCHES
6-6ACTUALvs6.9-5.1FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.9 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-3
POINT MARGIN / GAME+3.9
TCU won 6 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 6.9. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGEROKLAHOMATCU2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
LB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TENO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
LBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · OKLAHOMA
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB————6CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB————14CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————22CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————18CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————21CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————12CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————23CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE87th87
BLUE-CHIP RATIO53%92
RECRUITING CLASS#19 · 10/19 BC86
COACH STATUS——
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
TCUGARY PATTERSONFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
OUBOB STOOPSFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESOU OFFENSETCU OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBOKLAHOMA OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSETCU DEFENSE
OU QUARTERBACKSn=6RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
BAKER MAYFIELDQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
AUSTIN KENDALLQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
KYLER MURRAYQBTRUE FR
—3RD YR——UNR—
CONNOR MCGINNISQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
TANNER SCHAFERQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★2—
SHOW ALL 6
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TCU DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 51 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——11%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLOKLAHOMA OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TCU DEFENSE
OU OFFENSIVE LINEn=18RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
SAM GRANTOLTRUE FR
————UNR—
BEN POWERSOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
LOGAN ROBERSONOLTRUE FR
—2ND YR——★3—
MARIO SINACOLAOLTRUE FR
————UNR—
BOBBY EVANSOLTRUE FR
—3RD YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TCU FRONT-7n=30 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
BRANDON BOWENDTTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
JAMES MCFARLANDDETRUE FR
————UNR—
JOSH CARRAWAYDETRUE FR
————UNR—
AARON CURRYDTTRUE FR
————UNR—
L.J. COLLIERDETRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBOKLAHOMA OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TCU DEFENSE
OU RUNNING BACKSn=14RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DANIEL BROOKSRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
JOE MIXONRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
SAMAJE PERINERBTRUE FR
————UNR—
DEVIN MONTGOMERYRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
NAJEE BISSOONRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TCU FRONT-72 ROOMS · 30 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——11%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEOKLAHOMA OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYTCU DEFENSE
OU PASS CATCHERSn=22RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
GENO LEWISWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
DEDE WESTBROOKWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
JARVIS BAXTERWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
DAHU GREENWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
A.D. MILLERWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TCU SECONDARYn=21 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JEFF GLADNEYCBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
NICK ORRSTRUE FR
————UNR—
DENZEL JOHNSONSTRUE FR
————UNR—
CYD CALVINCBTRUE FR
————UNR—
KENNY ILOKASTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
OU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TCU
SP+ OVERALL
26.1
11.0
FPI
22.5
9.6
ELO
2047
1703
TALENT
777
666
PRODUCTION
98
74
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−11
+3
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.53
0.36
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
OU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TCU
PASS RATE
40.4%
53.1%
PACE
24.5s
24.2s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
17%
15%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
67.8%
53.5%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
68.1%
67.0%
PLAYS / GAME
73.5
74.4
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.1%
1.1%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = OU, ORANGE = TCU) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2016, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE