SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2016 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2016›WEEK 5›MEM @ MISS›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
ORE @ WSU80
FLA @ VAN77
STAN @ WASH75
OHIO @ M-OH72
WIS @ MICH71
ASU @ USC70
WYO @ CSU70
WAKE @ NCSU69
LOU @ CLEM67
ORST @ COLO65
TENN @ UGA65
WMU @ CMU65
NU @ IOWA64
NAVY @ AF64
MINN @ PSU64
MIZ @ LSU64
UNC @ FSU63
TA&M @ SC63
RUTG @ OSU62
MIA @ GT62
ULM @ AUB62
OU @ TCU61
CONN @ HOU60
SJSU @ UNM60
UTAH @ CAL60
MEM @ MISS60
TOL @ BYU59
SMU @ TEM59
UK @ ALA59
ND @ SYR58
KSU @ WVU58
UCF @ ECU57
FAU @ FIU56
RICE @ USM56
USF @ CIN56
ARIZ @ UCLA56
MRSH @ PITT55
BUF @ BC54
GAST @ APP53
NIU @ BALL53
NEV @ HAW53
TEX @ OKST52
UVA @ DUKE52
TULN @ MASS52
UTEP @ LT52
USU @ BOIS52
UL @ NMSU50
EMU @ BGSU49
MSU @ IU48
AKR @ KENT43
PUR @ MD43
BAY @ ISU42
MTSU @ UNT40
ODU @ CLT39
SDSU @ USA39
ILL @ NEB36
FRES @ UNLV36
KU @ TTU35
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
MEMPHIS
OLE MISS
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2016
SAT 19:00 ET|VAUGHT-HEMINGWAY STADIUMNONCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP48|O/U71.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
52FPI
MEMAACMEMPHIS
28
8-4
42
73
33
34%
68
50
28.0
—
+15.5
HOME
—AP
29FPI
MISSSECOLE MISS
48
5-7
90
83
48
77%
86
77
43.5
—
-15.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2016CONSENSUS · TEAMRANKINGS
FINALMEM28—MISS48
CLOSED MISS -15.5TOTAL 71.5MISS COVERED · 76 POINTS · OVER
MEM
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
MISS
28
POINTS
48
474
TOTAL YARDS
624
355 (31-47)
PASSING
361 (30-44)
119 (31)
RUSHING
263 (44)
27
FIRST DOWNS
34
5-13
THIRD DOWN
3-11
1-1
FOURTH DOWN
2-2
27:47
TIME OF POSS.
32:13
7-52
PENALTIES
6-65
4
TURNOVERS
1
1
SACKS
2
2
QB HURRIES
5
MEM
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
MISS
0.302
SEASON 0.309
EPA / PLAY
0.387
SEASON 0.268
46.7%
SEASON 45.5%
SUCCESS RATE
59.8%
SEASON 45.6%
20.0%
SEASON 18.4%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
16.1%
SEASON 18.5%
6.48
SEASON 6.57
YARDS / PLAY
7.17
SEASON 6.44
0.387
SEASON 0.252
EPA ALLOWED
0.302
SEASON 0.299
59.8%
SEASON 44.9%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
46.7%
SEASON 43.7%
16.1%
SEASON 15.3%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
20.0%
SEASON 18.0%
20.9%
SEASON 16.2%
STUFF RATE
17.2%
SEASON 14.9%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT4 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 5 FIELD n=58
MARKET
TOTAL71.5
SPREADMISS -15.5
IMPLIED — MEM28.0
IMPLIED — MISS43.5
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
72FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
1 / 3
BY ENVIRONMENT
3 / 58
DISAGREEMENT2 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 2 positions on a 58-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right. The market board is 3 games because 55 carry no published total, so the two are not the same field.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × FAST
MEM PACE25.1s
68
MISS PACE23.9s
86
SHARED PACE24.5s
77
PLAY VOLUME147
77
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
MEM78CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
88
TEMPO
68
EXPLOSIVE88p
88
TEMPO68p
68
MISS63CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
40
TEMPO
86
EXPLOSIVE40p
40
TEMPO86p
86
IS THE RECORD REAL2016 · FULL SEASON
MEMRECORD MATCHES
8-4ACTUALvs8.5-3.5FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.5 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-1
POINT MARGIN / GAME+12.5
MEMPHIS won 8 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 8.5. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
MISSRECORD MATCHES
5-7ACTUALvs5.7-6.3FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.7 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME-1.4
OLE MISS won 5 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 5.7. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERMEMPHISOLE MISS2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
LB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TENO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
LBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · MEMPHIS
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB————4CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB————8CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————24CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————18CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————17CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————14CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————18CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE42nd42
BLUE-CHIP RATIO0%26
RECRUITING CLASS#61 · 0/22 BC55
COACH STATUS——
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
MISSHUGH FREEZEFIRST SEASON4 SEASONS · 2 PROGRAMMES
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
4545
PACE
4949
PASS RATE
4040
EXPLOSIVENESS
2828
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
4545
HAVOC
8585
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
MEMMIKE NORVELLFIRST SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
5252
PACE
3939
PASS RATE
4747
EXPLOSIVENESS
9696
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
7070
HAVOC
7878
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESMEM OFFENSEMISS OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBMEMPHIS OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSEOLE MISS DEFENSE
MEM QUARTERBACKSn=4RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JASON STEWARTQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
RILEY FERGUSONQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
DAVID MOOREQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
BRADY DAVISQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
MISS DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 59 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——5%
LINEBACKERSLB
——5%
SECONDARYDB
——5%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLMEMPHIS OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7OLE MISS DEFENSE
MEM OFFENSIVE LINEn=18RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TREVON TATEOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
PEYTON JONESOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
DREW KYSEROLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SCOTTIE DILLOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
BRYTAIN PEDDYOLTRUE FR
—3RD YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
MISS FRONT-7n=38 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JOHN YOUNGBLOODDETRUE FR
————UNR—
ISSAC GROSSDTTRUE FR
————UNR—
FADOL BROWNDETRUE FR
————UNR—
AUSTRIAN ROBINSONDETRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
BENITO JONESDLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★5—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBMEMPHIS OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7OLE MISS DEFENSE
MEM RUNNING BACKSn=8RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
PATRICK TAYLOR JR.RBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
TEARRIS WALLACERBTRUE FR
————UNR—
ANTHONY YOUNGRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
DOROLAND DORCEUSRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
TONY POLLARDRBTRUE FR
—3RD YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 8
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
MISS FRONT-72 ROOMS · 38 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——5%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——5%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEMEMPHIS OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYOLE MISS DEFENSE
MEM PASS CATCHERSn=24RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DREW BISHOPWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
DANIEL HURDWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
DANIEL MONTIELTETRUE FR
————UNR—
JAE'LON OGLESBYWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
ANTHONY MILLERWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
MISS SECONDARYn=21 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CARLOS DAVISDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
TONY BRIDGESDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
A.J. MOOREDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
MYLES HARTSFIELDDBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
TONY CONNERDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
MEM
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
MISS
SP+ OVERALL
7.7
12.4
FPI
5.9
11.1
ELO
1707
1600
TALENT
451
808
PRODUCTION
62
81
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−23
+8
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.00
0.72
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
MEM
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
MISS
PASS RATE
51.1%
54.7%
PACE
25.1s
23.9s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
19%
18%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
53.2%
51.9%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
60.8%
71.1%
PLAYS / GAME
71.7
75.2
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
2.0%
0.6%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = MEM, ORANGE = MISS) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2016, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE