SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2016 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2016›WEEK 6›TENN @ TA&M›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
WKU @ LT87
IOWA @ MINN76
GT @ PITT74
WASH @ ORE74
AUB @ MSST73
CLEM @ BC70
COLO @ USC70
FSU @ MIA70
UGA @ SC70
MD @ PSU68
TENN @ TA&M68
TTU @ KSU67
ALA @ ARK66
GASO @ ARST64
ND @ NCSU64
TEX @ OU63
MICH @ RUTG63
TOL @ EMU62
VT @ UNC62
BOIS @ UNM61
ECU @ USF61
USM @ UTSA61
UCLA @ ASU61
TEM @ MEM60
TCU @ KU60
IU @ OSU60
VAN @ UK60
HOU @ NAVY58
SMU @ TLSA56
MASS @ ODU56
CIN @ CONN56
ARMY @ DUKE56
TXST @ GAST56
NIU @ WMU56
SYR @ WAKE55
AF @ WYO53
WSU @ STAN53
HAW @ SJSU52
FIU @ UTEP50
CAL @ ORST50
BGSU @ OHIO49
KENT @ BUF49
ARIZ @ UTAH49
USU @ CSU48
BYU @ MSU47
MRSH @ UNT44
M-OH @ AKR43
ISU @ OKST43
UNLV @ SDSU42
BALL @ CMU37
PUR @ ILL33
FRES @ NEV32
CLT @ FAU31
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
TENNESSEE
TEXAS A&M
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2016
SAT 15:30 ET|KYLE FIELDCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP1|O/UCOLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#22AP
17FPI
TENNSECTENNESSEE
38
8-4
90
94
56
88%
22
50
0.0
—
+6.5
HOME
—AP
16FPI
TA&MSECTEXAS A&M
45
8-4
91
83
80
54%
50
61
0.0
—
-6.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2016CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALTENN38—TA&M45
CLOSED TA&M -6.5TOTAL —TA&M COVERED
TENN
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
TA&M
38
POINTS
45
684
TOTAL YARDS
592
402 (29-48)
PASSING
239 (17-34)
282 (51)
RUSHING
353 (50)
29
FIRST DOWNS
21
6-17
THIRD DOWN
5-16
1-2
FOURTH DOWN
0-0
32:23
TIME OF POSS.
27:37
12-84
PENALTIES
7-45
7
TURNOVERS
3
1
SACKS
4
3
QB HURRIES
5
TENN
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
TA&M
0.304
SEASON 0.299
EPA / PLAY
0.299
SEASON 0.281
43.7%
SEASON 47.3%
SUCCESS RATE
34.7%
SEASON 42.3%
20.7%
SEASON 19.3%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
18.1%
SEASON 18.6%
6.84
SEASON 6.80
YARDS / PLAY
7.46
SEASON 6.71
0.299
SEASON 0.255
EPA ALLOWED
0.304
SEASON 0.181
34.7%
SEASON 44.0%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
43.7%
SEASON 42.9%
18.1%
SEASON 17.6%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
20.7%
SEASON 15.5%
18.2%
SEASON 19.8%
STUFF RATE
14.3%
SEASON 22.9%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT4 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 6 FIELD n=53
MARKET
TOTAL—
SPREADTA&M -6.5
IMPLIED — TENN—
IMPLIED — TA&M—
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
58FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY ENVIRONMENT
18 / 53
DISAGREEMENT—One of the two rankings could not be computed for this game, so there is no distance between them to state.
PACE COLLISION
SLOW × MIDDLING
TENN PACE27.6s
22
TA&M PACE26.1s
50
SHARED PACE26.9s
36
PLAY VOLUME134
36
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
TENN36CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
51
TEMPO
22
EXPLOSIVE51p
51
TEMPO22p
22
TA&M67CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
84
TEMPO
50
EXPLOSIVE84p
84
TEMPO50p
50
IS THE RECORD REAL2016 · FULL SEASON
TENNRECORD MATCHES
8-4ACTUALvs7.5-4.5FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.5 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+7.0
TENNESSEE won 8 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 7.5. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TA&MRECORD MATCHES
8-4ACTUALvs8.6-3.4FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.6 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+11.6
TEXAS A&M won 8 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 8.6. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERTENNESSEETEXAS A&M2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
LB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TENO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
LBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · TENNESSEE
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB————5CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB————9CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————27CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————21CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————18CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————14CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————16CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE90th90
BLUE-CHIP RATIO48%89
RECRUITING CLASS#14 · 8/19 BC90
COACH STATUS——
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
TA&MKEVIN SUMLINFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
TENNBUTCH JONESFIRST SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
7272
PACE
7272
PASS RATE
7474
EXPLOSIVENESS
4949
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
3131
HAVOC
5353
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESTENN OFFENSETA&M OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBTENNESSEE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSETEXAS A&M DEFENSE
TENN QUARTERBACKSn=5RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JOSHUA DOBBSQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHERIRON JONESQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
QUINTEN DORMADYQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
WILL MCBRIDEQBTRUE FR
—2ND YR——UNR—
ZAC JANCEKQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TA&M DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 45 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——6%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLTENNESSEE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TEXAS A&M DEFENSE
TENN OFFENSIVE LINEn=21RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
RYAN JOHNSONOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
BRANDON KENNEDYOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
JAHMIR JOHNSONOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
AUSTIN SMITHOLTRUE FR
—2ND YR——★3—
DYLAN WIESMANOLTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TA&M FRONT-7n=28 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DAESHON HALLDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
HARDRECK WALKERDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
MYLES GARRETTDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
REGGIE CHEVISDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
DAYLON MACKDLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBTENNESSEE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TEXAS A&M DEFENSE
TENN RUNNING BACKSn=9RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
ALVIN KAMARARBTRUE FR
————UNR—
JEREMY LEWISRBTRUE FR
————★3—
JOHN KELLYRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
TAELER DOWDYRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
CARLIN FILS-AIMERBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
SHOW ALL 9
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TA&M FRONT-72 ROOMS · 28 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TETENNESSEE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYTEXAS A&M DEFENSE
TENN PASS CATCHERSn=27RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JAUAN JENNINGSWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
JASON CROOMTETRUE FR
————UNR—
JOSH MALONEWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
MICHAEL LACEYWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
PRESTON WILLIAMSWRTRUE FR
—3RD YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TA&M SECONDARYn=17 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
NOEL ELLISDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
VICTOR DAVISDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
KEMAH SIVERANDDBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
JUSTIN EVANSDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
WILL PAULHILLDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
TENN
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TA&M
SP+ OVERALL
16.3
12.0
FPI
15.5
15.5
ELO
1729
1727
TALENT
814
815
PRODUCTION
89
80
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+1
+11
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.48
0.25
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
TENN
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TA&M
PASS RATE
43.6%
49.9%
PACE
27.6s
26.1s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
11%
13%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
63.5%
57.1%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
63.4%
64.8%
PLAYS / GAME
65.2
69.0
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
0.3%
0.7%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = TENN, ORANGE = TA&M) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2016, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE