SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2016 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2016›WEEK 7›STAN @ ND›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
TEM @ UCF83
WVU @ TTU79
WKU @ MTSU76
MISS @ ARK76
USC @ ARIZ72
OSU @ WIS71
APP @ UL70
DUKE @ LOU67
KSU @ OU66
STAN @ ND66
ASU @ COLO66
VAN @ UGA65
UCLA @ WSU65
ALA @ TENN64
USA @ ARST64
WMU @ AKR63
WAKE @ FSU63
USM @ LSU63
LT @ MASS62
MINN @ MD61
NCSU @ CLEM60
ILL @ RUTG59
VT @ SYR59
GASO @ GT58
MIZ @ FLA58
CSU @ BOIS58
MSST @ BYU56
PITT @ UVA56
KENT @ M-OH55
NEB @ IU55
UNC @ MIA55
UTSA @ RICE55
CMU @ NIU54
GAST @ TROY52
NU @ MSU51
UNM @ AF50
BGSU @ TOL50
UTAH @ ORST49
MEM @ TULN47
CONN @ USF47
UNLV @ HAW47
SDSU @ FRES46
IOWA @ PUR45
TLSA @ HOU45
ISU @ TEX44
EMU @ OHIO43
BALL @ BUF43
FIU @ CLT43
KU @ BAY38
TXST @ ULM38
NEV @ SJSU37
FAU @ MRSH34
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
STANFORD
NOTRE DAME
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2016
SAT 19:30 ET|NOTRE DAME STADIUMNONCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP5|O/U53.0COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#12AP
18FPI
STANACCSTANFORD
17
9-3
88
25
66
40%
11
32
25.0
—
+3.0
HOME
—AP
32FPI
NDINDNOTRE DAME
10
4-8
93
68
77
66%
31
81
28.0
—
-3.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2016CONSENSUS · TEAMRANKINGS
FINALSTAN17—ND10
CLOSED ND -3.0TOTAL 53.0STAN COVERED · 27 POINTS · UNDER
STAN
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
ND
17
POINTS
10
296
TOTAL YARDS
307
120 (10-20)
PASSING
154 (14-29)
176 (40)
RUSHING
153 (35)
18
FIRST DOWNS
16
7-12
THIRD DOWN
5-14
0-0
FOURTH DOWN
2-4
32:51
TIME OF POSS.
27:09
5-40
PENALTIES
7-47
3
TURNOVERS
2
4
SACKS
3
1
QB HURRIES
2
STAN
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
ND
0.194
SEASON 0.208
EPA / PLAY
0.208
SEASON 0.280
48.3%
SEASON 43.7%
SUCCESS RATE
41.7%
SEASON 45.9%
15.5%
SEASON 15.3%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
15.0%
SEASON 16.2%
4.84
SEASON 6.05
YARDS / PLAY
5.20
SEASON 6.22
0.208
SEASON 0.240
EPA ALLOWED
0.194
SEASON 0.185
41.7%
SEASON 42.4%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
48.3%
SEASON 43.0%
15.0%
SEASON 16.7%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
15.5%
SEASON 14.2%
17.2%
SEASON 13.2%
STUFF RATE
11.1%
SEASON 17.7%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT4 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 7 FIELD n=52
MARKET
TOTAL53.0
SPREADND -3.0
IMPLIED — STAN25.0
IMPLIED — ND28.0
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
36FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
3 / 4
BY ENVIRONMENT
45 / 52
DISAGREEMENT42 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 42 positions on a 52-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right. The market board is 4 games because 48 carry no published total, so the two are not the same field.
PACE COLLISION
SLOW × SLOW
STAN PACE28.5s
11
ND PACE27.2s
31
SHARED PACE27.9s
21
PLAY VOLUME129
21
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
STAN22CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
33
TEMPO
11
EXPLOSIVE33p
33
TEMPO11p
11
ND43CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
55
TEMPO
31
EXPLOSIVE55p
55
TEMPO31p
31
IS THE RECORD REAL2016 · FULL SEASON
STANRECORD OVERSTATES
9-3ACTUALvs7.9-4.1FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+1.1 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-1
POINT MARGIN / GAME+6.3
STANFORD won 9 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 7.9. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
NDRECORD UNDERSTATES
4-8ACTUALvs6.7-5.3FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-2.7 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-7
POINT MARGIN / GAME+3.1
NOTRE DAME won 4 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 6.7. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERSTANFORDNOTRE DAME2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
LB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TENO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
LBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · STANFORD
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB————5CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB————10CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————16CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————18CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————12CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————18CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————9CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE88th88
BLUE-CHIP RATIO28%81
RECRUITING CLASS#16 · 9/26 BC89
COACH STATUS——
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
NDBRIAN KELLYFIRST SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
9393
PACE
5454
PASS RATE
8484
EXPLOSIVENESS
5353
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
2929
HAVOC
5858
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
STANDAVID SHAWFIRST SEASON1 SEASON · 1 PROGRAMME
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
9292
PACE
7373
PASS RATE
9797
EXPLOSIVENESS
99
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
2626
HAVOC
2626
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESSTAN OFFENSEND OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBSTANFORD OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSENOTRE DAME DEFENSE
STAN QUARTERBACKSn=5RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
RYAN BURNSQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
KELLER CHRYSTQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
K.J. COSTELLOQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
JACK RICHARDSONQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
BRENT PEUSQBTRUE FR
————★2—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
ND DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 54 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——19%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——10%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLSTANFORD OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7NOTRE DAME DEFENSE
STAN OFFENSIVE LINEn=18RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
NATE HERBIGGTRUE FR
—3RD YR——★3—
JESSE BURKETTCTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
DEVERY HAMILTONOTTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
HENRY HATTISOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
DYLAN POWELLOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
ND FRONT-7n=34 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DANIEL CAGEDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
JAY HAYESDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
JARRON JONESDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
ISAAC ROCHELLDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
PETE MOKWUAHDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBSTANFORD OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7NOTRE DAME DEFENSE
STAN RUNNING BACKSn=10RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
PAT MCFADDENRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
CHRISTIAN MCCAFFREYRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
CAMERON SCARLETTRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
DANIEL MARXFBTRUE FR
————UNR—
BRYCE LOVERBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
ND FRONT-72 ROOMS · 34 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——19%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TESTANFORD OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYNOTRE DAME DEFENSE
STAN PASS CATCHERSn=16RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MICHAEL RECTORWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
FRANCIS OWUSUWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
GREG TABOADATETRUE FR
————UNR—
TAIJUAN THOMASWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
DONALD STEWARTWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
ND SECONDARYn=20 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
AVERY SEBASTIANSTRUE FR
————UNR—
COLE LUKECBTRUE FR
————UNR—
DREW RECKERSTRUE FR
————UNR—
ASHTON WHITEDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
DEVIN STUDSTILLSTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
STAN
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
ND
SP+ OVERALL
16.4
15.7
FPI
14.3
9.7
ELO
1750
1725
TALENT
778
842
PRODUCTION
90
87
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−3
+6
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.28
0.42
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
STAN
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
ND
PASS RATE
41.0%
51.2%
PACE
28.5s
27.2s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
16%
24%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
66.1%
55.5%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
57.7%
65.9%
PLAYS / GAME
63.2
66.1
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.9%
0.8%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = STAN, ORANGE = ND) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2016, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE