SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2016 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2016›WEEK 9›MICH @ MSU›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
FLA @ UGA77
VT @ PITT72
UK @ MIZ72
MIA @ ND72
NAVY @ USF71
UCF @ HOU71
WASH @ UTAH71
AUB @ MISS71
UNT @ UTSA70
CLEM @ FSU69
UNM @ HAW69
APP @ GASO68
LOU @ UVA67
BC @ NCSU67
CIN @ TEM67
SMU @ TULN67
NEB @ WIS66
WVU @ OKST65
DUKE @ GT65
CAL @ USC64
SDSU @ USU64
MRSH @ USM64
PSU @ PUR63
NMSU @ TA&M63
TLSA @ MEM63
MINN @ ILL62
WKU @ FAU62
NU @ OSU60
ASU @ ORE60
MICH @ MSU59
BOIS @ WYO59
ARMY @ WAKE58
MD @ IU58
TENN @ SC58
AF @ FRES57
GAST @ USA57
ULM @ ARST55
TTU @ TCU54
RICE @ LT53
MTSU @ FIU52
CONN @ ECU51
KSU @ ISU50
BAY @ TEX49
STAN @ ARIZ49
ODU @ UTEP48
UNLV @ SJSU48
OHIO @ TOL45
KU @ OU44
WSU @ ORST44
M-OH @ EMU43
KENT @ CMU39
AKR @ BUF29
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
MICHIGAN
MICHIGAN STATE
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2016
SAT 12:00 ET|SPARTAN STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP10|O/UCOLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#10AP
3FPI
MICHB1GMICHIGAN
32
10-2
95
71
99
50%
68
76
0.0
—
-21.0
HOME
—AP
60FPI
MSUB1GMICHIGAN STATE
23
3-9
84
63
40
23%
52
56
0.0
—
+21.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2016CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALMICH32—MSU23
CLOSED MICH -21.0TOTAL —MSU COVERED
MICH
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
MSU
32
POINTS
23
436
TOTAL YARDS
401
244 (16-25)
PASSING
184 (13-28)
192 (42)
RUSHING
217 (42)
24
FIRST DOWNS
23
5-12
THIRD DOWN
4-12
1-1
FOURTH DOWN
1-4
30:16
TIME OF POSS.
29:44
5-62
PENALTIES
7-57
1
TURNOVERS
1
2
SACKS
0
9
QB HURRIES
4
MICH
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
MSU
0.301
SEASON 0.241
EPA / PLAY
0.138
SEASON 0.210
50.8%
SEASON 45.6%
SUCCESS RATE
41.2%
SEASON 41.6%
21.5%
SEASON 17.4%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
19.1%
SEASON 14.6%
6.63
SEASON 6.07
YARDS / PLAY
6.10
SEASON 5.79
0.138
SEASON 0.003
EPA ALLOWED
0.301
SEASON 0.206
41.2%
SEASON 30.7%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
50.8%
SEASON 41.8%
19.1%
SEASON 12.1%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
21.5%
SEASON 14.8%
30.8%
SEASON 26.0%
STUFF RATE
24.4%
SEASON 22.6%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT4 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 9 FIELD n=52
MARKET
TOTAL—
SPREADMICH -21.0
IMPLIED — MICH—
IMPLIED — MSU—
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
49FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY ENVIRONMENT
28 / 52
DISAGREEMENT—One of the two rankings could not be computed for this game, so there is no distance between them to state.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × MIDDLING
MICH PACE25.1s
68
MSU PACE26.1s
52
SHARED PACE25.6s
60
PLAY VOLUME141
60
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
MICH45CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
22
TEMPO
68
EXPLOSIVE22p
22
TEMPO68p
68
MSU40CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
29
TEMPO
52
EXPLOSIVE29p
29
TEMPO52p
52
IS THE RECORD REAL2016 · FULL SEASON
MICHRECORD UNDERSTATES
10-2ACTUALvs11.3-0.7FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-1.3 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+28.5
MICHIGAN won 10 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 11.3. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
MSURECORD UNDERSTATES
3-9ACTUALvs5.0-7.0FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-2.0 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-3
POINT MARGIN / GAME-3.7
MICHIGAN STATE won 3 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 5.0. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERMICHIGANMICHIGAN STATE2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
LB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TENO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
LBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · MICHIGAN
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB————7CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB————20CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————27CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————20CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————19CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————19CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————20CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE95th95
BLUE-CHIP RATIO38%85
RECRUITING CLASS#8 · 14/32 BC95
COACH STATUS——
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
MSUMARK DANTONIOFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
MICHJIM HARBAUGHFIRST SEASON2 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
2828
PACE
4444
PASS RATE
55
EXPLOSIVENESS
2121
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
3535
HAVOC
9292
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESMICH OFFENSEMSU OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBMICHIGAN OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSEMICHIGAN STATE DEFENSE
MICH QUARTERBACKSn=7RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
SHANE MORRISQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
JOHN O'KORNQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
WILTON SPEIGHTQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
BRANDON PETERSQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
MICHAEL SESSAQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 7
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
MSU DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 45 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——13%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——17%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLMICHIGAN OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7MICHIGAN STATE DEFENSE
MICH OFFENSIVE LINEn=20RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE BY GRADE
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JON RUNYANOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
MICHAEL ONWENUOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
ANDREW VASTARDISOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★2—
STEPHEN SPANELLISOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
BEN BREDESONOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
MSU FRONT-7n=27 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
EVAN JONESDETRUE FR
————★2—
MALIK MCDOWELLDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
GABE SHERRODDETRUE FR
————UNR—
KEVIN WILLIAMSDTTRUE FR
————UNR—
MIKE PANASIUKDTTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBMICHIGAN OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7MICHIGAN STATE DEFENSE
MICH RUNNING BACKSn=20RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
BOBBY HENDERSONFBTRUE FR
————UNR—
DE'VEON SMITHRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
MICHAEL HIRSCHFBTRUE FR
————UNR—
JOE HEWLETTRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
JOE BENEDUCCIFBTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
MSU FRONT-72 ROOMS · 27 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——13%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEMICHIGAN OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYMICHIGAN STATE DEFENSE
MICH PASS CATCHERSn=27RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MICHAEL JOCZTETRUE FR
————UNR—
JAKE BUTTTETRUE FR
————UNR—
AMARA DARBOHWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
JEHU CHESSONWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
TYRONE WHEATLEYTETRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
MSU SECONDARYn=18 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DEMETRIOUS COXDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
DARIAN HICKSCBTRUE FR
————UNR—
VAYANTE COPELANDCBTRUE FR
————UNR—
MONTAE NICHOLSONSTRUE FR
————UNR—
JALEN WATTS-JACKSONDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
MICH
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
MSU
SP+ OVERALL
24.4
7.4
FPI
27.0
3.9
ELO
2133
1608
TALENT
853
720
PRODUCTION
96
61
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−2
+22
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.38
0.56
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
MICH
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
MSU
PASS RATE
40.3%
47.5%
PACE
25.1s
26.1s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
19%
24%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
64.4%
64.8%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
52.3%
70.3%
PLAYS / GAME
71.8
69.1
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
3.9%
1.1%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = MICH, ORANGE = MSU) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2016, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE