SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2016 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2016›WEEK 9›RICE @ LT›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
FLA @ UGA77
VT @ PITT72
UK @ MIZ72
MIA @ ND72
NAVY @ USF71
UCF @ HOU71
WASH @ UTAH71
AUB @ MISS71
UNT @ UTSA70
CLEM @ FSU69
UNM @ HAW69
APP @ GASO68
LOU @ UVA67
BC @ NCSU67
CIN @ TEM67
SMU @ TULN67
NEB @ WIS66
WVU @ OKST65
DUKE @ GT65
CAL @ USC64
SDSU @ USU64
MRSH @ USM64
PSU @ PUR63
NMSU @ TA&M63
TLSA @ MEM63
MINN @ ILL62
WKU @ FAU62
NU @ OSU60
ASU @ ORE60
MICH @ MSU59
BOIS @ WYO59
ARMY @ WAKE58
MD @ IU58
TENN @ SC58
AF @ FRES57
GAST @ USA57
ULM @ ARST55
TTU @ TCU54
RICE @ LT53
MTSU @ FIU52
CONN @ ECU51
KSU @ ISU50
BAY @ TEX49
STAN @ ARIZ49
ODU @ UTEP48
UNLV @ SJSU48
OHIO @ TOL45
KU @ OU44
WSU @ ORST44
M-OH @ EMU43
KENT @ CMU39
AKR @ BUF29
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
RICE
LOUISIANA TECH
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2016
SAT 19:00 ET|JOE AILLET STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP14|O/UCOLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
121FPI
RICEAACRICE
16
3-9
28
23
12
45%
74
13
0.0
—
+23.0
HOME
—AP
59FPI
LTSBCLOUISIANA TECH
61
8-5
43
98
19
36%
42
28
0.0
—
-23.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2016CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALRICE16—LT61
CLOSED LT -23.0TOTAL —LT COVERED
RICE
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
LT
16
POINTS
61
305
TOTAL YARDS
735
152 (15-27)
PASSING
434 (24-31)
153 (43)
RUSHING
301 (39)
18
FIRST DOWNS
28
6-15
THIRD DOWN
7-11
0-0
FOURTH DOWN
1-1
31:13
TIME OF POSS.
28:47
1-6
PENALTIES
3-25
2
TURNOVERS
1
2
SACKS
5
3
QB HURRIES
4
RICE
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
LT
0.074
SEASON 0.166
EPA / PLAY
0.817
SEASON 0.470
38.8%
SEASON 41.4%
SUCCESS RATE
60.9%
SEASON 54.2%
10.4%
SEASON 14.5%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
23.4%
SEASON 20.0%
4.37
SEASON 5.22
YARDS / PLAY
11.47
SEASON 8.09
0.817
SEASON 0.357
EPA ALLOWED
0.074
SEASON 0.286
60.9%
SEASON 44.5%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
38.8%
SEASON 48.2%
23.4%
SEASON 18.0%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
10.4%
SEASON 16.4%
12.9%
SEASON 15.8%
STUFF RATE
5.6%
SEASON 17.9%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT4 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 9 FIELD n=52
MARKET
TOTAL—
SPREADLT -23.0
IMPLIED — RICE—
IMPLIED — LT—
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
66FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY ENVIRONMENT
5 / 52
DISAGREEMENT—One of the two rankings could not be computed for this game, so there is no distance between them to state.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × MIDDLING
RICE PACE24.8s
74
LT PACE26.6s
42
SHARED PACE25.7s
58
PLAY VOLUME141
58
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
RICE45CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
16
TEMPO
74
EXPLOSIVE16p
16
TEMPO74p
74
LT59CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
76
TEMPO
42
EXPLOSIVE76p
76
TEMPO42p
42
IS THE RECORD REAL2016 · FULL SEASON
RICERECORD MATCHES
3-9ACTUALvs3.4-8.6FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.4 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME-12.1
RICE won 3 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 3.4. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
LTRECORD MATCHES
8-5ACTUALvs8.7-4.3FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.7 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+11.3
LOUISIANA TECH won 8 of 13 against a scoring profile describing 8.7. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERRICELOUISIANA TECH2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
LB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TENO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
LBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · RICE
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB————5CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB————10CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————19CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————19CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————16CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————11CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————19CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE28th28
BLUE-CHIP RATIO7%62
RECRUITING CLASS#129 · 0/18 BC4
COACH STATUS——
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
LTSKIP HOLTZFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
RICEDAVID BAILIFFFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESRICE OFFENSELT OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBRICE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSELOUISIANA TECH DEFENSE
RICE QUARTERBACKSn=5RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TYLER STEHLINGQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
J.T. GRANATOQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
JACKSON TYNERQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
TOM STEWARTQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
NATE GERMANQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LT DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 53 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLRICE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7LOUISIANA TECH DEFENSE
RICE OFFENSIVE LINEn=19RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TREY MARTINOLTRUE FR
————UNR—
CORY KLINGLEROLTRUE FR
————UNR—
SAM PIERCEOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
CALVIN ANDERSONOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
COLE ELMSOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LT FRONT-7n=31 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
AARON BROWNDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
ERIC KENDZIORDLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★2—
KA'DERRION MASONDTTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
DELDRICK CANTYDETRUE FR
————UNR—
CEDRIC JOHNSONDTTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBRICE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7LOUISIANA TECH DEFENSE
RICE RUNNING BACKSn=10RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DARIK DILLARDRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
JOWAN DAVISRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
PAINE MATISCIKFBTRUE FR
————UNR—
SAMUEL STEWARTRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
EMMANUEL ESUKPARBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LT FRONT-72 ROOMS · 31 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TERICE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYLOUISIANA TECH DEFENSE
RICE PASS CATCHERSn=19RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TEMI ALAKAWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
LANCE WRIGHTWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
PARKER SMITHWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
CONNOR CELLATETRUE FR
————UNR—
CAMERON DECELLWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LT SECONDARYn=22 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
LLOYD GROGANSTRUE FR
————UNR—
CYRIL NOLAND-LEWISSTRUE FR
————UNR—
DAMARION KINGSTRUE FR
————UNR—
AARON ROBERSONCBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
TREY SPENCERCBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
RICE
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
LT
SP+ OVERALL
-16.5
3.1
FPI
-16.1
4.0
ELO
1109
1654
TALENT
395
451
PRODUCTION
6
54
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+18
−15
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.07
0.00
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
RICE
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
LT
PASS RATE
49.0%
59.4%
PACE
24.8s
26.6s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
16%
13%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
59.7%
47.8%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
67.9%
79.8%
PLAYS / GAME
72.7
67.8
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
0.1%
1.7%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = RICE, ORANGE = LT) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2016, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE