SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2016 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2016›WEEK 11›IDHO @ TXST›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
TLSA @ NAVY81
USF @ MEM78
LSU @ ARK77
UK @ TENN72
AUB @ UGA72
APP @ TROY71
ORST @ UCLA69
TOL @ NIU68
WAKE @ LOU68
USM @ ODU66
BC @ FSU65
SC @ FLA65
PITT @ CLEM65
TTU @ OKST65
CIN @ UCF64
BAY @ OU64
MIA @ UVA64
UNT @ WKU64
NCSU @ SYR63
VAN @ MIZ63
WVU @ TEX61
OSU @ MD61
MICH @ IOWA61
UNC @ DUKE60
MSST @ ALA60
PSU @ IU60
TULN @ HOU60
ILL @ WIS60
MISS @ TA&M60
USC @ WASH60
CAL @ WSU60
UL @ GASO59
GT @ VT59
STAN @ ORE59
WMU @ KENT58
WYO @ UNLV57
CSU @ AF57
EMU @ BALL53
BOIS @ HAW53
MTSU @ MRSH53
ARMY @ ND52
MINN @ NEB52
NMSU @ ARST51
M-OH @ BUF50
COLO @ ARIZ50
UNM @ USU50
SDSU @ NEV50
SMU @ ECU48
ULM @ GAST47
UTAH @ ASU45
RUTG @ MSU45
UTEP @ FAU45
NU @ PUR42
UTSA @ LT42
ISU @ KU40
BGSU @ AKR38
RICE @ CLT38
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
IDAHO
TEXAS STATE
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2016
SAT 16:00 ET|BOBCAT STADIUM (TX)CONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP|O/UCOLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
96FPI
IDHOBSKYIDAHO
47
8-4
0
0
0
65%
0
6
0.0
—
-8.0
HOME
—AP
128FPI
TXSTPACTEXAS STATE
14
2-10
17
2
10
34%
18
23
0.0
—
+8.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2016CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALIDHO47—TXST14
CLOSED IDHO -8.0TOTAL —IDHO COVERED
IDHO
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
TXST
47
POINTS
14
490
TOTAL YARDS
175
336 (26-33)
PASSING
193 (15-19)
154 (40)
RUSHING
-18 (28)
23
FIRST DOWNS
13
6-13
THIRD DOWN
0-9
1-1
FOURTH DOWN
0-0
38:28
TIME OF POSS.
21:32
14-103
PENALTIES
5-25
0
TURNOVERS
2
4
SACKS
2
2
QB HURRIES
1
IDHO
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
TXST
0.393
SEASON 0.188
EPA / PLAY
0.051
SEASON 0.052
52.9%
SEASON 43.5%
SUCCESS RATE
37.2%
SEASON 36.0%
17.1%
SEASON 12.6%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
16.3%
SEASON 11.6%
6.64
SEASON 5.41
YARDS / PLAY
4.86
SEASON 4.32
0.051
SEASON 0.290
EPA ALLOWED
0.393
SEASON 0.314
37.2%
SEASON 47.0%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
52.9%
SEASON 47.1%
16.3%
SEASON 16.9%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
17.1%
SEASON 17.3%
38.1%
SEASON 16.4%
STUFF RATE
13.9%
SEASON 16.1%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT2 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 11 FIELD n=57
MARKET
TOTAL—
SPREADIDHO -8.0
IMPLIED — IDHO—
IMPLIED — TXST—
PACE COLLISION
UNMEASURED × SLOW
IDHO PACE26.3s
—
TXST PACE27.7s
18
SHARED PACE27.0s
—
PLAY VOLUME133
—
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
TXST30CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
41
TEMPO
18
EXPLOSIVE41p
41
TEMPO18p
18
IS THE RECORD REAL2016 · FULL SEASON
IDHORECORD OVERSTATES
8-4ACTUALvs5.6-6.4FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+2.4 W
ONE SCORE RECORD4-0
POINT MARGIN / GAME-1.5
IDAHO won 8 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 5.6. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TXSTRECORD MATCHES
2-10ACTUALvs1.6-10.4FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.4 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-1
POINT MARGIN / GAME-22.5
TEXAS STATE won 2 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 1.6. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERIDAHOTEXAS STATE2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
LB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TENO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
LBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · IDAHO
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
RB————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
WR/TE————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
OL————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
DL————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
LB————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
DB————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
RECRUITING CLASS#123 · 0/24 BC8
COACH STATUS——
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
TXSTEVERETT WITHERSFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
IDHOPAUL PETRINOFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESIDHO OFFENSETXST OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBIDAHO OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSETEXAS STATE DEFENSE
IDHO QUARTERBACKSn=0RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
QUARTERBACKS BY GRADE
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TXST DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 61 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLIDAHO OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TEXAS STATE DEFENSE
IDHO OFFENSIVE LINEn=0RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE BY GRADE
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TXST FRONT-7n=38 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JOSH ULUOCHANTTRUE FR
————UNR—
DALLAS MCCLARTYNTTRUE FR
————UNR—
STAN KANUDETRUE FR
————UNR—
JEREMY MILLERDETRUE FR
————UNR—
JORDAN MITTIEDTTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBIDAHO OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TEXAS STATE DEFENSE
IDHO RUNNING BACKSn=0RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
BACKFIELD BY GRADE
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TXST FRONT-72 ROOMS · 38 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEIDAHO OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYTEXAS STATE DEFENSE
IDHO PASS CATCHERSn=0RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS BY GRADE
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TXST SECONDARYn=23 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CAMYRON BROWNSTRUE FR
————UNR—
JAVANTE O'ROYSTRUE FR
————UNR—
DILA ROSEMONDSTRUE FR
————UNR—
ANDREW ANEKECBTRUE FR
————UNR—
STEPHAN JOHNSONSTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
IDHO
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TXST
FPI
-7.7
-26.1
PRODUCTION
24
0
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−22
+13
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
IDHO
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TXST
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
15%
19%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
54.4%
56.5%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
62.4%
69.7%
PLAYS / GAME
68.4
64.9
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
3.3%
2.1%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = IDHO, ORANGE = TXST) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2016, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE