SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2016 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2016›WEEK 12›LOU @ HOU›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
ARK @ MSST82
OU @ WVU80
NU @ MINN75
UNM @ CSU72
MIA @ NCSU71
NAVY @ ECU71
TLSA @ UCF71
FLA @ LSU70
ARST @ TROY69
DUKE @ PITT69
CLEM @ WAKE69
TTU @ ISU68
USM @ UNT67
NIU @ EMU66
VT @ ND66
CONN @ BC65
TEM @ TULN65
OHIO @ CMU63
FSU @ SYR63
AF @ SJSU63
KSU @ BAY62
UL @ UGA62
WSU @ COLO62
MIZ @ TENN62
USC @ UCLA62
WIS @ PUR61
IOWA @ ILL61
ASU @ WASH61
UTSA @ TA&M60
IU @ MICH60
LOU @ HOU59
ULM @ APP59
BUF @ WMU59
OKST @ TCU56
ORE @ UTAH56
GASO @ GAST56
ODU @ FAU56
PSU @ RUTG56
ARIZ @ ORST56
UNLV @ BOIS55
OSU @ MSU54
MEM @ CIN53
UVA @ GT53
USF @ SMU53
SDSU @ WYO52
USU @ NEV52
MTSU @ CLT51
MRSH @ FIU51
MISS @ VAN51
HAW @ FRES50
TEX @ KU49
BALL @ TOL48
KENT @ BGSU43
TXST @ NMSU43
STAN @ CAL43
UTEP @ RICE37
MASS @ BYU37
MD @ NEB33
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
LOUISVILLE
HOUSTON
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2016
THU 20:00 ET|TDECU STADIUMNONCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP15|O/U68.0COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#21AP
9FPI
LOUACCLOUISVILLE
10
9-3
77
99
88
100%
76
—
42.5
—
-17.0
HOME
—AP
38FPI
HOUB12HOUSTON
36
9-3
62
59
87
71%
96
—
25.5
—
+17.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2016CONSENSUS · TEAMRANKINGS
FINALLOU10—HOU36
CLOSED LOU -17.0TOTAL 68.0HOU COVERED · 46 POINTS · UNDER
LOU
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
HOU
10
POINTS
36
312
TOTAL YARDS
362
211 (20-43)
PASSING
298 (27-46)
101 (40)
RUSHING
64 (33)
18
FIRST DOWNS
21
8-21
THIRD DOWN
5-17
2-4
FOURTH DOWN
1-2
31:31
TIME OF POSS.
28:29
15-114
PENALTIES
1-5
3
TURNOVERS
0
1
SACKS
11
5
QB HURRIES
9
LOU
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
HOU
0.080
SEASON 0.424
EPA / PLAY
0.078
SEASON 0.244
35.8%
SEASON 49.8%
SUCCESS RATE
40.5%
SEASON 45.4%
13.6%
SEASON 23.6%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
10.1%
SEASON 16.1%
4.19
SEASON 7.70
YARDS / PLAY
4.58
SEASON 5.70
0.078
SEASON 0.086
EPA ALLOWED
0.080
SEASON 0.119
40.5%
SEASON 34.9%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
35.8%
SEASON 35.5%
10.1%
SEASON 14.1%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
13.6%
SEASON 14.9%
28.1%
SEASON 26.1%
STUFF RATE
3.6%
SEASON 24.0%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT4 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 12 FIELD n=58
MARKET
TOTAL68.0
SPREADLOU -17.0
IMPLIED — LOU42.5
IMPLIED — HOU25.5
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
56FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
1 / 4
BY ENVIRONMENT
20 / 58
DISAGREEMENT19 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 19 positions on a 58-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right. The market board is 4 games because 54 carry no published total, so the two are not the same field.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × FAST
LOU PACE24.7s
76
HOU PACE21.9s
96
SHARED PACE23.3s
86
PLAY VOLUME155
86
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
LOU80CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
85
TEMPO
76
EXPLOSIVE85p
85
TEMPO76p
76
HOU73CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
49
TEMPO
96
EXPLOSIVE49p
49
TEMPO96p
96
IS THE RECORD REAL2016 · FULL SEASON
LOURECORD MATCHES
9-3ACTUALvs9.9-2.1FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.9 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+22.0
LOUISVILLE won 9 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 9.9. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
HOURECORD MATCHES
9-3ACTUALvs9.3-2.7FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.3 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+15.4
HOUSTON won 9 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 9.3. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERLOUISVILLEHOUSTON2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
LB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TENO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
LBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · LOUISVILLE
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB————4CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB————12CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————22CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————18CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————15CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————11CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————19CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE77th77
BLUE-CHIP RATIO27%81
RECRUITING CLASS#38 · 2/20 BC72
COACH STATUS——
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
HOUTOM HERMANFIRST SEASON2 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
6262
PACE
4747
PASS RATE
7272
EXPLOSIVENESS
9090
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
8686
HAVOC
4646
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
LOUBOBBY PETRINOFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESLOU OFFENSEHOU OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBLOUISVILLE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSEHOUSTON DEFENSE
LOU QUARTERBACKSn=4RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
ETHAN HORTONQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
KYLE BOLINQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
LAMAR JACKSONQBTRUE FR
————★4—
SEAN MCCORMACKQBTRUE FR
—3RD YR——UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
HOU DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 49 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——7%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLLOUISVILLE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7HOUSTON DEFENSE
LOU OFFENSIVE LINEn=18RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MATT COHENOLTRUE FR
————UNR—
KIOLA MAHONIOLTRUE FR
————UNR—
GERON CHRISTIANOLTRUE FR
————UNR—
TYLER HAYCRAFTOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
LINWOOD FOYOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
HOU FRONT-7n=27 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
NICK THURMANDETRUE FR
————UNR—
B.J. SINGLETONDTTRUE FR
————UNR—
CAMERON MALVEAUXDETRUE FR
————UNR—
ZACH VAUGHANDETRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
LEROY GODFREYDLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBLOUISVILLE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7HOUSTON DEFENSE
LOU RUNNING BACKSn=12RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
BRANDON RADCLIFFRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
LAMAR ATKINSFBTRUE FR
————UNR—
MALIN JONESRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
LJ SCOTTRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
TREY SMITHRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
HOU FRONT-72 ROOMS · 27 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——7%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TELOUISVILLE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYHOUSTON DEFENSE
LOU PASS CATCHERSn=22RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
COLE HIKUTINITETRUE FR
————UNR—
DEVANTE PEETEWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SETH DAWKINSWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
JAMES QUICKWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
KEITH TOWBRIDGETETRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
HOU SECONDARYn=22 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
HOWARD WILSONCBTRUE FR
————UNR—
KHALIL WILLIAMSSTRUE FR
————UNR—
JEREMY WINCHESTERCBTRUE FR
————UNR—
COLLIN WILDERSTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
BRANDON WILSONCBTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
LOU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
HOU
SP+ OVERALL
22.9
10.1
FPI
21.6
8.9
ELO
1872
1746
TALENT
654
573
PRODUCTION
94
70
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−18
−10
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.27
0.11
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
LOU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
HOU
OFF EFFICIENCY
94
53
DEF EFFICIENCY
98
92
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
85
50
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
18
21
FINISHING DRIVES
88
83
FIELD POSITION
21
0
TURNOVER MARGIN
72
41
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
LOU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
HOU
PASS RATE
49.6%
51.0%
PACE
24.7s
21.9s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
18%
27%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
57.0%
55.1%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
65.5%
64.5%
PLAYS / GAME
72.9
82.2
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
2.6%
1.2%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = LOU, ORANGE = HOU) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2016, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE