SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2016 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2016›WEEK 14›LT @ WKU›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
LT @ WKU80
COLO @ WASH71
TEM @ NAVY71
WIS @ PSU69
ALA @ FLA68
CLEM @ VT66
OKST @ OU65
KSU @ TCU57
ARST @ TXST55
SDSU @ WYO53
WMU @ OHIO52
TROY @ GASO52
BAY @ WVU50
UL @ ULM49
NMSU @ USA45
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
LOUISIANA TECH
WESTERN KENTUCKY
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2016
SAT 12:00 ET|HOUCHENS INDUSTRIES-L.T. SMITH STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP13|O/UCOLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
59FPI
LTSBCLOUISIANA TECH
44
8-5
43
98
19
36%
42
—
0.0
—
+7.5
HOME
—AP
28FPI
WKUCUSAWESTERN KENTUCKY
58
10-3
30
94
71
39%
6
—
0.0
—
-7.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2016CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALLT44—WKU58
CLOSED WKU -7.5TOTAL —WKU COVERED
LT
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
WKU
44
POINTS
58
507
TOTAL YARDS
656
502 (35-57)
PASSING
421 (21-31)
5 (22)
RUSHING
235 (41)
26
FIRST DOWNS
31
5-14
THIRD DOWN
6-11
1-1
FOURTH DOWN
0-0
28:24
TIME OF POSS.
31:36
8-64
PENALTIES
7-75
1
TURNOVERS
3
0
SACKS
5
2
QB HURRIES
4
LT
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
WKU
0.341
SEASON 0.470
EPA / PLAY
0.601
SEASON 0.439
46.2%
SEASON 54.2%
SUCCESS RATE
57.8%
SEASON 51.4%
14.1%
SEASON 20.0%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
28.2%
SEASON 20.3%
6.76
SEASON 8.09
YARDS / PLAY
9.65
SEASON 7.84
0.601
SEASON 0.286
EPA ALLOWED
0.341
SEASON 0.192
57.8%
SEASON 48.2%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
46.2%
SEASON 38.2%
28.2%
SEASON 16.4%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
14.1%
SEASON 14.1%
17.1%
SEASON 17.9%
STUFF RATE
17.6%
SEASON 24.4%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT4 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 14 FIELD n=15
MARKET
TOTAL—
SPREADWKU -7.5
IMPLIED — LT—
IMPLIED — WKU—
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
62FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY ENVIRONMENT
3 / 15
DISAGREEMENT—One of the two rankings could not be computed for this game, so there is no distance between them to state.
PACE COLLISION
MIDDLING × SLOW
LT PACE26.6s
42
WKU PACE29.7s
6
SHARED PACE28.1s
24
PLAY VOLUME128
24
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
LT59CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
76
TEMPO
42
EXPLOSIVE76p
76
TEMPO42p
42
WKU48CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
90
TEMPO
6
EXPLOSIVE90p
90
TEMPO6p
6
IS THE RECORD REAL2016 · FULL SEASON
LTRECORD MATCHES
8-5ACTUALvs8.7-4.3FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.7 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+11.3
LOUISIANA TECH won 8 of 13 against a scoring profile describing 8.7. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
WKURECORD MATCHES
10-3ACTUALvs10.6-2.4FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.6 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+21.0
WESTERN KENTUCKY won 10 of 13 against a scoring profile describing 10.6. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERLOUISIANA TECHWESTERN KENTUCKY2016 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
LB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TENO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
LBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · LOUISIANA TECH
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB————5CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB————9CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————23CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————18CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————17CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————14CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————22CARRIED FROM 2015 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE43rd43
BLUE-CHIP RATIO0%26
RECRUITING CLASS#94 · 0/18 BC30
COACH STATUS——
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
WKUJEFF BROHMFIRST SEASON4 SEASONS · 2 PROGRAMMES
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
8585
PACE
6262
PASS RATE
7575
EXPLOSIVENESS
2626
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
2121
HAVOC
6666
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
LTSKIP HOLTZFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESLT OFFENSEWKU OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBLOUISIANA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSEWESTERN KENTUCKY DEFENSE
LT QUARTERBACKSn=5RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
RYAN HIGGINSQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
J'MAR SMITHQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
PRICE WILSONQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
JACK ABRAHAMQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
J'MAR SMITHQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
WKU DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 51 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLLOUISIANA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7WESTERN KENTUCKY DEFENSE
LT OFFENSIVE LINEn=18RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
KIRBY WIXSONOLTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHANE CARPENTEROLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
MICHAEL RODRIGUEZOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
ETHAN REEDOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
KODY RUSSEYOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
WKU FRONT-7n=33 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DERIK OVERSTREETDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
NICK DAWSON-BRENTSDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
DEVANTE DUCLOSDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
KALVIN ROBINSONDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
TANNER REEVESDLTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBLOUISIANA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7WESTERN KENTUCKY DEFENSE
LT RUNNING BACKSn=9RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
BOBBY HOLLYFBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
BOSTON SCOTTRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
JARRED CRAFTRBTRUE FR
————UNR—
DEE FLEMINGRBTRUE FR
—3RD YR——UNR—
KAM MCKNIGHTRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 9
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
WKU FRONT-72 ROOMS · 33 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TELOUISIANA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYWESTERN KENTUCKY DEFENSE
LT PASS CATCHERSn=23RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CONNER SMITHWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
CARLOS HENDERSONWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
TRENT TAYLORWRTRUE FR
————UNR—
JAVONTE WOODARDWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
ALEX WOODALLTETRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
WKU SECONDARYn=18 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DE'ANDRE SIMMONSDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
MARCUS WARDDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
JUWAN GARDNERDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
JOE BROWNDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
MARTAVIUS MIMSDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
LT
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
WKU
SP+ OVERALL
3.1
15.5
FPI
4.0
11.4
ELO
1654
1975
TALENT
451
402
PRODUCTION
54
86
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−15
−60
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.00
0.00
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
LT
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
WKU
PASS RATE
59.4%
51.0%
PACE
26.6s
29.7s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
13%
20%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
47.8%
55.7%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
79.8%
68.0%
PLAYS / GAME
67.8
60.6
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.7%
3.7%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = LT, ORANGE = WKU) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2016, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE