SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2017 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2017›WEEK 3›IDHO @ WMU›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
CLEM @ LOU78
UCLA @ MEM77
WIS @ BYU70
CSU @ ALA68
KSU @ VAN68
ARMY @ OSU67
LSU @ MSST67
TENN @ FLA66
ORE @ WYO66
ISU @ AKR63
USU @ WAKE62
SMU @ TCU62
GAST @ PSU62
ASU @ TTU62
PUR @ MIZ60
KU @ OHIO59
OKST @ PITT59
UL @ TA&M59
TULN @ OU59
FRES @ WASH59
BAY @ DUKE58
CMU @ SYR58
TLSA @ TOL58
MISS @ CAL58
SJSU @ UTAH57
ND @ BC56
ORST @ WSU55
TEX @ USC55
UK @ SC54
BGSU @ NU54
MTSU @ MINN53
APP @ TXST53
USM @ ULM53
VT @ ECU52
UNC @ ODU52
UNM @ BOIS50
STAN @ SDSU49
ARIZ @ UTEP48
CONN @ UVA48
LT @ WKU48
ILL @ USF47
UNT @ IOWA46
AF @ MICH45
NIU @ NEB44
TROY @ NMSU43
KENT @ MRSH42
MASS @ TEM41
CIN @ M-OH41
RICE @ HOU37
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
IDAHO
WESTERN MICHIGAN
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2017
SAT 19:00 ET|WALDO STADIUMNONCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP|O/U54.0COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
110FPI
IDHOBSKYIDAHO
28
4-8
0
0
0
59%
0
29
18.3
—
+17.5
HOME
—AP
80FPI
WMUMACWESTERN MICHIGAN
37
6-6
38
28
18
22%
61
6
35.8
—
-17.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2017CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALIDHO28—WMU37
CLOSED WMU -17.5TOTAL 54.0IDHO COVERED · 65 POINTS · OVER
IDHO
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
WMU
28
POINTS
37
399
TOTAL YARDS
347
229 (16-26)
PASSING
212 (21-31)
170 (34)
RUSHING
135 (42)
15
FIRST DOWNS
20
3-12
THIRD DOWN
8-17
0-0
FOURTH DOWN
0-0
28:11
TIME OF POSS.
31:49
6-44
PENALTIES
6-70
3
TURNOVERS
1
2
SACKS
4
1
QB HURRIES
1
IDHO
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
WMU
0.241
SEASON 0.116
EPA / PLAY
0.115
SEASON 0.194
35.1%
SEASON 38.3%
SUCCESS RATE
40.3%
SEASON 44.1%
14.0%
SEASON 13.3%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
13.9%
SEASON 14.1%
6.14
SEASON 5.13
YARDS / PLAY
4.71
SEASON 5.62
0.115
SEASON 0.183
EPA ALLOWED
0.241
SEASON 0.234
40.3%
SEASON 42.1%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
35.1%
SEASON 40.0%
13.9%
SEASON 15.8%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
14.0%
SEASON 14.9%
27.5%
SEASON 23.3%
STUFF RATE
24.1%
SEASON 22.3%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2017 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT3 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 3 FIELD n=49
MARKET
TOTAL54.0
SPREADWMU -17.5
IMPLIED — IDHO18.3
IMPLIED — WMU35.8
PACE COLLISION
UNMEASURED × MIDDLING
IDHO PACE26.8s
—
WMU PACE25.9s
61
SHARED PACE26.4s
—
PLAY VOLUME137
—
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
WMU37CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
13
TEMPO
61
EXPLOSIVE13p
13
TEMPO61p
61
IS THE RECORD REAL2017 · FULL SEASON
IDHORECORD MATCHES
4-8ACTUALvs4.6-7.4FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.6 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-5
POINT MARGIN / GAME-4.8
IDAHO won 4 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 4.6. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
WMURECORD UNDERSTATES
6-6ACTUALvs7.1-4.9FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-1.1 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-3
POINT MARGIN / GAME+4.9
WESTERN MICHIGAN won 6 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 7.1. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERIDAHOWESTERN MICHIGAN2017 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
LB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TENO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
LBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · IDAHO
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
RB————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
WR/TE————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
OL————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
DL————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
LB————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
DB————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
RECRUITING CLASS#134 · 0/18 BC0
CLASS RANK TREND-11 · 2 CYCLES28
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 2nd YR—
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
WMUTIM LESTERFIRST SEASON1 SEASON · 1 PROGRAMME
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
2626
PACE
1010
PASS RATE
6060
EXPLOSIVENESS
4949
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
2525
HAVOC
9999
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
IDHOPAUL PETRINO2TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESIDHO OFFENSEWMU OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBIDAHO OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSEWESTERN MICHIGAN DEFENSE
IDHO QUARTERBACKSn=0RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
QUARTERBACKS BY GRADE
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
WMU DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 40 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLIDAHO OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7WESTERN MICHIGAN DEFENSE
IDHO OFFENSIVE LINEn=0RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE BY GRADE
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
WMU FRONT-7n=25 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
KEN FINLEYDLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
DESHAWN FOSTERDLRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
ANTONIO BALABANIDERET
—4TH YR——UNR—
ALI FAYADDETRUE FR
—4TH YR——★2—
ANDRE TURNERDERET
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBIDAHO OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7WESTERN MICHIGAN DEFENSE
IDHO RUNNING BACKSn=0RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
BACKFIELD BY GRADE
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
WMU FRONT-72 ROOMS · 25 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEIDAHO OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYWESTERN MICHIGAN DEFENSE
IDHO PASS CATCHERSn=0RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS BY GRADE
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
WMU SECONDARYn=15 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
STEFAN CLAIBORNESRET
—4TH YR——★3—
MALIK RUCKERDBRET
————UNR—
ANTON CURTISCBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
JUSTIN TRANQUILLSRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SAM BEALDBRET
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
IDHO
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
WMU
FPI
-15.0
-4.1
PRODUCTION
16
39
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−14
−4
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
IDHO
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
WMU
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
22%
15%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
54.4%
71.8%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
62.4%
56.2%
PLAYS / GAME
67.1
69.6
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.1%
0.7%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = IDHO, ORANGE = WMU) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2017, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE