SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2017 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2017›WEEK 9›LT @ RICE›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
LOU @ WAKE82
ARK @ MISS81
OKST @ WVU77
MSU @ NU72
FSU @ BC71
AF @ CSU70
MSST @ TA&M70
WSU @ ARIZ69
UGA @ FLA68
DUKE @ VT68
EMU @ NIU67
UTAH @ ORE67
TTU @ OU67
PSU @ OSU65
TEX @ BAY64
UVA @ PITT64
TCU @ ISU64
MIZ @ CONN64
USC @ ASU64
WIS @ ILL63
APP @ MASS61
HOU @ USF61
MINN @ IOWA61
STAN @ ORST60
UNM @ WYO60
GT @ CLEM60
TLSA @ SMU59
RUTG @ MICH59
IU @ MD58
UCLA @ WASH58
NCSU @ ND58
VAN @ SC58
MIA @ UNC57
TENN @ UK57
SDSU @ HAW57
NEB @ PUR54
USA @ GAST53
ODU @ UNT53
FAU @ WKU52
TOL @ BALL51
CAL @ COLO51
TULN @ MEM50
ARST @ NMSU49
UNLV @ FRES49
LT @ RICE48
BOIS @ USU48
SJSU @ BYU47
GASO @ TROY45
BUF @ AKR44
UTSA @ UTEP38
KSU @ KU33
FIU @ MRSH32
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
LOUISIANA TECH
RICE
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2017
SAT 15:30 ET|RICE STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP11|O/U51.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
86FPI
LTSBCLOUISIANA TECH
42
6-6
36
48
13
23%
62
28
31.8
—
-12.0
HOME
—AP
122FPI
RICEAACRICE
28
1-11
25
37
3
38%
3
15
19.8
—
+12.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2017CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALLT42—RICE28
CLOSED LT -12.0TOTAL 51.5LT COVERED · 70 POINTS · OVER
LT
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
RICE
42
POINTS
28
417
TOTAL YARDS
434
237 (21-32)
PASSING
187 (7-17)
180 (39)
RUSHING
247 (46)
24
FIRST DOWNS
19
5-11
THIRD DOWN
5-10
1-1
FOURTH DOWN
1-1
31:21
TIME OF POSS.
28:39
4-25
PENALTIES
5-49
0
TURNOVERS
4
1
SACKS
2
2
QB HURRIES
4
LT
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
RICE
0.342
SEASON 0.234
EPA / PLAY
0.544
SEASON 0.206
50.7%
SEASON 45.4%
SUCCESS RATE
59.3%
SEASON 41.2%
15.5%
SEASON 16.5%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
22.0%
SEASON 17.8%
5.87
SEASON 5.99
YARDS / PLAY
7.47
SEASON 5.73
0.544
SEASON 0.253
EPA ALLOWED
0.342
SEASON 0.349
59.3%
SEASON 47.8%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
50.7%
SEASON 49.3%
22.0%
SEASON 14.8%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
15.5%
SEASON 19.4%
9.1%
SEASON 16.7%
STUFF RATE
18.9%
SEASON 14.0%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2017 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 9 FIELD n=52
MARKET
TOTAL51.5
SPREADLT -12.0
IMPLIED — LT31.8
IMPLIED — RICE19.8
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
54FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
29 / 52
BY ENVIRONMENT
18 / 52
DISAGREEMENT11 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 11 positions on a 52-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
MIDDLING × SLOW
LT PACE25.8s
62
RICE PACE30.9s
3
SHARED PACE28.4s
33
PLAY VOLUME128
33
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
LT35CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
8
TEMPO
62
EXPLOSIVE8p
8
TEMPO62p
62
RICE33CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
63
TEMPO
3
EXPLOSIVE63p
63
TEMPO3p
3
IS THE RECORD REAL2017 · FULL SEASON
LTRECORD MATCHES
6-6ACTUALvs6.5-5.5FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.5 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-4
POINT MARGIN / GAME+2.1
LOUISIANA TECH won 6 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 6.5. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
RICERECORD MATCHES
1-11ACTUALvs1.6-10.4FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.6 W
ONE SCORE RECORD0-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME-19.5
RICE won 1 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 1.6. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERLOUISIANA TECHRICE2017 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Ryan HigginsQB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%Conner SmithWR · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%Kirby WixsonOL · SHARE NOT MEASURED
DL0%Aaron BrownDL · SHARE NOT MEASURED
LB0%Dalton SantosLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB0%Lloyd GroganS · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TEGeorge Scott · SIGNEE ★2Griffin Hebert · SIGNEE ★2Cualan Williams · SIGNEE ★2INTACT
OLJoshua Mote · SIGNEE ★3Conner Estes · SIGNEE ★2INTACT
DLNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
LBTristan Allen · SIGNEE ★2INTACT
DBAmik Robertson · SIGNEE ★3JaCorion Andrews · SIGNEE ★3Kollin Hurt · SIGNEE ★2INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · LOUISIANA TECH
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———85CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———999CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————19CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————16CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————17CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————13CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————18CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE36th36
BLUE-CHIP RATIO0%19
RECRUITING CLASS#100 · 0/13 BC26
CLASS RANK TREND-6 · 2 CYCLES38
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 2nd YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX15%36
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
RICEDAVID BAILIFF2TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
LTSKIP HOLTZ2TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESLT OFFENSERICE OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBLOUISIANA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
8
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSERICE DEFENSE
LT QUARTERBACKSn=592% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
J'MAR SMITHQBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
WESTIN ELLIOTTQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
ELIJAH WALKERQBTRUE FR
————★3—
JUSTIN STOLBERGQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
NATE COXQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RICE DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 45 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLLOUISIANA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7RICE DEFENSE
LT OFFENSIVE LINEn=16RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
KODY RUSSEYOLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
MICHAEL RODRIGUEZOLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHANE CARPENTEROLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
ETHAN REEDOLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
TAYLOR FONDALOLTRUE FR
—3RD YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RICE FRONT-7n=27 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JAE PHANDERET
————UNR—
BLAIN PADGETTDERET
—4TH YR——UNR—
ELIJAH GARCIADLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★2—
ROE WILKINSDTRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
BRIAN WOMACDERET
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBLOUISIANA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
99
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7RICE DEFENSE
LT RUNNING BACKSn=91% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
BOBBY HOLLYFBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
ISRAEL TUCKERRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★2—
BOSTON SCOTTRBRET
————UNR—
JARRED CRAFTRBRET
————UNR—
KAM MCKNIGHTRBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 9
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RICE FRONT-72 ROOMS · 27 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TELOUISIANA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYRICE DEFENSE
LT PASS CATCHERSn=19RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JAVONTE WOODARDWRRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
ZACH COUSARTETRUE FR
—3RD YR——★3—
ADRIAN HARDYWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
CEE JAY POWELLWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★2—
GEORGE SCOTTWRRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RICE SECONDARYn=18 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DESTRI WHITESRET
————UNR—
HOUSTON ROBERTSRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
DASHARM NEWSOMESTRUE FR
—3RD YR——★2—
D'ANGELO ELLISDBRET
—3RD YR——★2—
COLE THOMASSRET
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
LT
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
RICE
SP+ OVERALL
-5.5
-23.6
FPI
-6.5
-22.9
ELO
1556
996
TALENT
394
346
PRODUCTION
28
2
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+5
+20
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.00
0.00
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
LT
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
RICE
PASS RATE
48.7%
36.3%
PACE
25.8s
30.9s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
15%
24%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
60.3%
71.0%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
68.9%
50.2%
PLAYS / GAME
69.7
58.3
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
0.1%
1.9%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = LT, ORANGE = RICE) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2017, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE