SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2017 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2017›WEEK 13›TA&M @ LSU›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
IU @ PUR79
ARIZ @ ASU78
MIZ @ ARK75
VT @ UVA73
NIU @ CMU72
LOU @ UK70
FSU @ FLA69
ALA @ AUB69
WVU @ OU68
OSU @ MICH67
ISU @ KSU67
WIS @ MINN67
VAN @ TENN67
CLEM @ SC67
APP @ GAST66
WSU @ WASH66
ND @ STAN66
USM @ MRSH65
UGA @ GT64
PSU @ MD64
MIA @ PITT61
IOWA @ NEB61
KU @ OKST61
UNLV @ NEV60
OHIO @ BUF59
TULN @ SMU59
DUKE @ WAKE59
ORST @ ORE59
TA&M @ LSU59
BC @ SYR58
UNC @ NCSU58
BOIS @ FRES58
MSU @ RUTG58
ARST @ ULM57
COLO @ UTAH57
MISS @ MSST56
BAY @ TCU56
ECU @ MEM56
TTU @ TEX55
CAL @ UCLA55
UNT @ RICE54
NU @ ILL54
USU @ AF53
WMU @ TOL52
USF @ UCF51
WKU @ FIU51
ODU @ MTSU48
TEM @ TLSA48
WYO @ SJSU47
BYU @ HAW47
FAU @ CLT46
UNM @ SDSU45
NAVY @ HOU44
UTSA @ LT43
TXST @ TROY41
KENT @ AKR40
CONN @ CIN40
GASO @ UL40
BGSU @ EMU35
M-OH @ BALL31
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
TEXAS A&M
LSU
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2017
SAT 19:30 ET|TIGER STADIUM (LA)CONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP7|O/U50.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
40FPI
TA&MSECTEXAS A&M
21
7-5
89
64
80
34%
66
—
19.8
—
+11.0
HOME
#18AP
14FPI
LSUSECLSU
45
9-3
96
76
88
69%
24
—
30.8
—
-11.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2017CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALTA&M21—LSU45
CLOSED LSU -11.0TOTAL 50.5LSU COVERED · 66 POINTS · OVER
TA&M
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
LSU
21
POINTS
45
282
TOTAL YARDS
601
227 (16-30)
PASSING
351 (20-31)
55 (27)
RUSHING
250 (56)
14
FIRST DOWNS
27
3-11
THIRD DOWN
8-15
1-1
FOURTH DOWN
0-0
20:29
TIME OF POSS.
39:31
5-54
PENALTIES
2-30
4
TURNOVERS
1
4
SACKS
2
0
QB HURRIES
1
TA&M
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
LSU
0.186
SEASON 0.195
EPA / PLAY
0.372
SEASON 0.259
41.5%
SEASON 38.1%
SUCCESS RATE
44.2%
SEASON 45.8%
9.4%
SEASON 13.7%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
15.1%
SEASON 15.2%
5.32
SEASON 5.61
YARDS / PLAY
7.19
SEASON 6.32
0.372
SEASON 0.205
EPA ALLOWED
0.186
SEASON 0.149
44.2%
SEASON 40.4%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
41.5%
SEASON 37.8%
15.1%
SEASON 14.4%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
9.4%
SEASON 13.6%
17.6%
SEASON 21.1%
STUFF RATE
20.8%
SEASON 16.5%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2017 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 13 FIELD n=60
MARKET
TOTAL50.5
SPREADLSU -11.0
IMPLIED — TA&M19.8
IMPLIED — LSU30.8
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
39FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
43 / 60
BY ENVIRONMENT
44 / 60
DISAGREEMENT1 SLOTThe two rankings disagree by 1 position on a 60-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
MIDDLING × SLOW
TA&M PACE25.7s
66
LSU PACE27.9s
24
SHARED PACE26.8s
45
PLAY VOLUME135
45
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
TA&M68CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
71
TEMPO
66
EXPLOSIVE71p
71
TEMPO66p
66
LSU19CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
15
TEMPO
24
EXPLOSIVE15p
15
TEMPO24p
24
IS THE RECORD REAL2017 · FULL SEASON
TA&MRECORD MATCHES
7-5ACTUALvs6.6-5.4FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.4 W
ONE SCORE RECORD4-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+2.4
TEXAS A&M won 7 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 6.6. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
LSURECORD MATCHES
9-3ACTUALvs8.7-3.3FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.3 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-1
POINT MARGIN / GAME+9.3
LSU won 9 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 8.7. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERTEXAS A&MLSU2017 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Conner McQueenQB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
RB0%James WhitePORTAL · LAMAR · SHARE NOT MEASURED
WR/TE0%Edward PopeWR · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION7 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%Daeshon HallDRAFTED · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION5 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%Shaan WashingtonLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB0%Noel EllisDB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
RBJacob Kibodi · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
WR/TEJhamon Ausbon · SIGNEE ★4Hezekiah Jones · SIGNEE ★4Camron Buckley · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLJayden Peevy · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
LBAnthony Hines · SIGNEE ★4Santino Marchiol · SIGNEE ★4Buddy Johnson · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
DBDerrick Tucker · SIGNEE ★4Keldrick Carper · SIGNEE ★4Myles Jones · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · TEXAS A&M
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———227CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———9313CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————24CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————19CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————17CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————15CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————20CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE89th89
BLUE-CHIP RATIO36%85
RECRUITING CLASS#13 · 10/25 BC91
CLASS RANK TREND+5 · 2 CYCLES60
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 2nd YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX23%75
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
LSUED ORGERON2TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
TA&MKEVIN SUMLIN2TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESTA&M OFFENSELSU OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBTEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
22
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSELSU DEFENSE
TA&M QUARTERBACKSn=778% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JAKE HUBENAKQBRET
————UNR—
NICK STARKELQBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
KELLEN MONDQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
COLTON TAYLORQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
HANK HUGHESQBRET
————★2—
SHOW ALL 7
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LSU DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 51 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——25%
LINEBACKERSLB
——35%
SECONDARYDB
——37%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLTEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7LSU DEFENSE
TA&M OFFENSIVE LINEn=19RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
KODA MARTINOLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
ERIK MCCOYOLRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
COLTON PRATEROLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
RILEY ANDERSONOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
KELLEN DIESCHOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LSU FRONT-7n=32 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CHRISTIAN LACOUTUREDERET
————UNR—
FRANK HERRONDERET
————UNR—
GREG GILMORENTRET
————UNR—
DEONDRE CLARKDERET
————UNR—
RASHARD LAWRENCEDLRET
—4TH YR——★5—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBTEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
93
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7LSU DEFENSE
TA&M RUNNING BACKSn=137% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CULLEN GILLASPIAFBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
KWAME ETWIRBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
JACOB KIBODIRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
KEITH FORDRBRET
————UNR—
KENDALL BUSSEYRBRET
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LSU FRONT-72 ROOMS · 32 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——25%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——35%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TETEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYLSU DEFENSE
TA&M PASS CATCHERSn=24RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MATTHEW KIRCHNERWRRET
————UNR—
CHRISTIAN KIRKWRRET
————UNR—
DAMION RATLEYWRRET
————UNR—
KENDRICK ROGERSWRTRUE FR
—3RD YR——★3—
ROSHAUUD PAULWRTRUE FR
—3RD YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LSU SECONDARYn=19 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DONTE JACKSONDBRET
————UNR—
XAVIER LEWISCBRET
————UNR—
KEVIN TOLIVER IICBRET
————UNR—
TODD HARRIS JR.STRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
JOHN BATTLESRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
TA&M
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
LSU
SP+ OVERALL
9.4
21.1
FPI
5.9
13.9
ELO
1663
1854
TALENT
807
907
PRODUCTION
72
92
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+17
+4
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.36
0.60
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
TA&M
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
LSU
PASS RATE
47.7%
37.3%
PACE
25.7s
27.9s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
11%
11%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
58.7%
72.0%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
60.1%
61.0%
PLAYS / GAME
70.1
64.6
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
0.4%
0.7%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = TA&M, ORANGE = LSU) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2017, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE