SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2018 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2018›WEEK 7›TA&M @ SC›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
UCF @ MEM74
COLO @ USC74
TA&M @ SC72
IOWA @ IU71
MIA @ UVA70
FLA @ VAN69
WASH @ ORE68
TTU @ TCU67
UGA @ LSU67
TENN @ AUB64
MSU @ PSU64
VT @ UNC64
APP @ ARST63
ULM @ CCU63
MISS @ ARK63
WIS @ MICH62
WVU @ ISU61
UCLA @ CAL59
MTSU @ FIU59
USM @ UNT58
TEM @ NAVY57
WYO @ FRES57
UAB @ RICE56
BAY @ TEX56
ARMY @ SJSU56
UNM @ CSU56
NMSU @ UL56
NEB @ NU55
PUR @ ILL55
MIZ @ ALA55
DUKE @ GT54
MRSH @ ODU54
AF @ SDSU53
OKST @ KSU53
PITT @ ND53
WKU @ CLT53
USF @ TLSA51
ARIZ @ UTAH51
HAW @ BYU51
LOU @ BC50
OHIO @ NIU49
TOL @ EMU48
BALL @ CMU48
UNLV @ USU48
MINN @ OSU46
BOIS @ NEV45
RUTG @ MD41
WMU @ BGSU40
LT @ UTSA40
HOU @ ECU39
AKR @ BUF38
KENT @ M-OH36
TROY @ LIB32
GASO @ TXST30
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
TEXAS A&M
SOUTH CAROLINA
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2018
SAT 15:30 ET|WILLIAMS-BRICE STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP4|O/U50.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#16AP
13FPI
TA&MSECTEXAS A&M
26
8-4
89
95
77
61%
92
98
26.5
—
-2.5
HOME
—AP
35FPI
SCSECSOUTH CAROLINA
23
7-5
85
93
80
89%
47
78
24.0
—
+2.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2018CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALTA&M26—SC23
CLOSED TA&M -2.5TOTAL 50.5TA&M COVERED · 49 POINTS · UNDER
TA&M
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
SC
26
POINTS
23
458
TOTAL YARDS
299
353 (25-37)
PASSING
223 (17-35)
105 (40)
RUSHING
76 (18)
25
FIRST DOWNS
19
3-13
THIRD DOWN
2-9
0-0
FOURTH DOWN
1-1
41:29
TIME OF POSS.
18:31
12-117
PENALTIES
4-39
0
TURNOVERS
2
1
SACKS
2
4
QB HURRIES
4
TA&M
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
SC
0.196
SEASON 0.287
EPA / PLAY
0.199
SEASON 0.293
45.5%
SEASON 49.0%
SUCCESS RATE
36.5%
SEASON 44.7%
16.9%
SEASON 20.2%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
15.4%
SEASON 15.4%
5.95
SEASON 6.41
YARDS / PLAY
5.75
SEASON 6.52
0.199
SEASON 0.237
EPA ALLOWED
0.196
SEASON 0.246
36.5%
SEASON 39.9%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
45.5%
SEASON 47.9%
15.4%
SEASON 16.5%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
16.9%
SEASON 17.3%
17.6%
SEASON 21.2%
STUFF RATE
23.7%
SEASON 15.4%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2018 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 7 FIELD n=54
MARKET
TOTAL50.5
SPREADTA&M -2.5
IMPLIED — TA&M26.5
IMPLIED — SC24.0
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
56FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
44 / 54
BY ENVIRONMENT
16 / 54
DISAGREEMENT28 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 28 positions on a 54-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × MIDDLING
TA&M PACE23.8s
92
SC PACE26.5s
47
SHARED PACE25.2s
70
PLAY VOLUME143
70
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
TA&M54CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
16
TEMPO
92
EXPLOSIVE16p
16
TEMPO92p
92
SC47CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
47
TEMPO
47
EXPLOSIVE47p
47
TEMPO47p
47
IS THE RECORD REAL2018 · FULL SEASON
TA&MRECORD MATCHES
8-4ACTUALvs7.9-4.1FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.1 W
ONE SCORE RECORD4-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+8.3
TEXAS A&M won 8 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 7.9. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
SCRECORD MATCHES
7-5ACTUALvs7.3-4.7FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.3 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+5.4
SOUTH CAROLINA won 7 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 7.3. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERTEXAS A&MSOUTH CAROLINA2018 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Jake HubenakQB · SHARE NOT MEASURED
RB0%Keith FordRB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
WR/TE0%Kalvin ClineTE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%Koda MartinPORTAL · SYRACUSE · SHARE NOT MEASURED
DL0%Zaycoven HendersonDL · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%Justin DunningLB · SHARE NOT MEASURED
DB0%Priest WillisDB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
RBCharles Strong · SIGNEE ★3Deneric Prince · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
WR/TEJalen Preston · SIGNEE ★4Caleb Chapman · SIGNEE ★4Montel Parker · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLColten Blanton · SIGNEE ★4Tank Jenkins · SIGNEE ★4Luke Matthews · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
DLBobby Brown · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
LBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
DBLeon O'Neal Jr. · SIGNEE ★4Jordan Moore · SIGNEE ★4Brian Johnson · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · TEXAS A&M
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———966CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———5115CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————27CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————15CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————18CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————15CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————24CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE89th89
BLUE-CHIP RATIO38%87
RECRUITING CLASS#17 · 13/22 BC88
CLASS RANK TREND+1 · 3 CYCLES52
COACH STATUSNEW HEAD COACH—
DEV TRANSITION MIX31%90
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
SCWILL MUSCHAMP3TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
TA&MJIMBO FISHERFIRST SEASON2 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
7878
PACE
5050
PASS RATE
7474
EXPLOSIVENESS
5252
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
1111
HAVOC
9494
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESTA&M OFFENSESC OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBTEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
96
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSESOUTH CAROLINA DEFENSE
TA&M QUARTERBACKSn=64% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
NICK STARKELQBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
KELLEN MONDQBRET
—4TH YR——★4—
COLTON TAYLORQBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
ALEX FERNANDESQBTRUE FR
—2ND YR——★2—
JAGGER LAROEQBTRUE FR
—3RD YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 6
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
SC DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 49 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——38%
LINEBACKERSLB
——24%
SECONDARYDB
——5%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLTEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7SOUTH CAROLINA DEFENSE
TA&M OFFENSIVE LINEn=15RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JARED HOCKEROLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
ERIK MCCOYOLRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
RILEY ANDERSONOLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
KELLEN DIESCHOLRET
—4TH YR——★4—
COLTON PRATEROLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
SC FRONT-7n=30 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
KINGSLEY ENAGBAREDLTRUE FR
————★4—
GRIFFIN GENTRYDLRET
—3RD YR——★2—
KOBE SMITHDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
JAVON KINLAWDLRET
—4TH YR——★4—
JABARI ELLISDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBTEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
51
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7SOUTH CAROLINA DEFENSE
TA&M RUNNING BACKSn=1549% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DENERIC PRINCERBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
CULLEN GILLASPIAFBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
KWAME ETWIRBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
JACOB KIBODIRBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
TRAYVEON WILLIAMSRBRET
—3RD YR——★4—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
SC FRONT-72 ROOMS · 30 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——38%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——24%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TETEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYSOUTH CAROLINA DEFENSE
TA&M PASS CATCHERSn=27RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JACE STERNBERGERTETRUE FR
—3RD YR——UNR—
KENDRICK ROGERSWRRET
—3RD YR——★3—
ROSHAUUD PAULWRRET
—3RD YR——★3—
QUARTNEY DAVISWRRET
—3RD YR——★4—
TREVOR WOODTETRUE FR
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
SC SECONDARYn=19 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JONATHAN GIPSONDBTRUE FR
—1ST YR——★3—
JASON SENNDBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
STEVEN MONTACDBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
KEISEAN NIXONDBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
J.T. IBESTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
TA&M
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
SC
SP+ OVERALL
21.6
14.9
FPI
15.8
8.3
ELO
1858
1548
TALENT
806
750
PRODUCTION
92
85
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−4
−1
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.38
0.34
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
TA&M
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
SC
PASS RATE
46.9%
52.4%
PACE
23.8s
26.5s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
9%
28%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
63.3%
52.2%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
69.9%
63.6%
PLAYS / GAME
75.5
67.8
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.2%
1.6%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = TA&M, ORANGE = SC) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2018, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE