SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2018 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2018›WEEK 9›DUKE @ PITT›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
MIA @ BC79
GT @ VT75
SDSU @ NEV73
DUKE @ PITT71
WSU @ STAN71
TA&M @ MSST71
BAY @ WVU69
MASS @ CONN68
USM @ CLT68
CCU @ GAST68
NIU @ BYU67
TEX @ OKST67
CLEM @ FSU66
WASH @ CAL66
ARMY @ EMU65
VAN @ ARK65
FLA @ UGA65
CIN @ SMU65
NCSU @ SYR65
WIS @ NU64
CMU @ AKR64
UK @ MIZ64
ORE @ ARIZ64
ARST @ UL63
TENN @ SC63
BALL @ OHIO62
PUR @ MSU62
ND @ NAVY61
IOWA @ PSU60
MTSU @ ODU60
UAB @ UTEP60
APP @ GASO59
TTU @ ISU59
ASU @ USC59
TOL @ WMU57
UTAH @ UCLA57
TCU @ KU55
TULN @ TLSA55
WAKE @ LOU54
LT @ FAU52
KSU @ OU52
FIU @ WKU52
UNC @ UVA51
UNM @ USU49
BOIS @ AF49
HAW @ FRES48
WYO @ CSU47
USF @ HOU46
NMSU @ TXST46
ORST @ COLO44
IU @ MINN42
UNLV @ SJSU40
TROY @ USA36
RICE @ UNT36
ILL @ MD31
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
DUKE
PITTSBURGH
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2018
SAT 15:30 ET|ACRISURE STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP1|O/U46.0COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
43FPI
DUKEACCDUKE
45
7-5
72
21
82
85%
70
75
24.5
—
-3.0
HOME
—AP
49FPI
PITTACCPITTSBURGH
54
7-6
73
53
65
51%
4
88
21.5
—
+3.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2018CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALDUKE45—PITT54
CLOSED DUKE -3.0TOTAL 46.0PITT COVERED · 99 POINTS · OVER
DUKE
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
PITT
45
POINTS
54
619
TOTAL YARDS
634
396 (27-43)
PASSING
150 (8-19)
223 (34)
RUSHING
484 (52)
28
FIRST DOWNS
29
8-13
THIRD DOWN
3-8
1-2
FOURTH DOWN
0-0
26:02
TIME OF POSS.
33:58
4-36
PENALTIES
4-50
1
TURNOVERS
0
1
SACKS
2
4
QB HURRIES
6
DUKE
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
PITT
—
SEASON 0.133
EPA / PLAY
—
SEASON 0.208
—
SEASON 40.0%
SUCCESS RATE
—
SEASON 40.8%
—
SEASON 13.6%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
—
SEASON 15.1%
—
SEASON 5.29
YARDS / PLAY
—
SEASON 5.66
—
SEASON 0.171
EPA ALLOWED
—
SEASON 0.201
—
SEASON 38.4%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
—
SEASON 41.1%
—
SEASON 14.5%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
—
SEASON 15.5%
—
SEASON 17.4%
STUFF RATE
—
SEASON 18.4%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2018 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 9 FIELD n=55
MARKET
TOTAL46.0
SPREADDUKE -3.0
IMPLIED — DUKE24.5
IMPLIED — PITT21.5
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
26FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
49 / 55
BY ENVIRONMENT
54 / 55
DISAGREEMENT5 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 5 positions on a 55-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × SLOW
DUKE PACE25.4s
70
PITT PACE29.8s
4
SHARED PACE27.6s
37
PLAY VOLUME131
37
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
DUKE61CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
52
TEMPO
70
EXPLOSIVE52p
52
TEMPO70p
70
PITT43CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
82
TEMPO
4
EXPLOSIVE82p
82
TEMPO4p
4
IS THE RECORD REAL2018 · FULL SEASON
DUKERECORD OVERSTATES
7-5ACTUALvs5.9-6.1FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+1.1 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-0
POINT MARGIN / GAME-0.3
DUKE won 7 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 5.9. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
PITTRECORD OVERSTATES
7-6ACTUALvs5.9-7.1FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+1.1 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME-2.2
PITTSBURGH won 7 of 13 against a scoring profile describing 5.9. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERDUKEPITTSBURGH2018 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Parker BoehmeQB · SHARE NOT MEASURED
RB0%Shaun WilsonRB · SHARE NOT MEASURED
WR/TE0%Quay ChambersWR · SHARE NOT MEASURED
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%Mike RamsayDT · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%Zavier CarmichaelLB · SHARE NOT MEASURED
DB0%Bryon Fields Jr.CB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
RBMataeo Durant · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
WR/TEDennis Smith · SIGNEE ★3Jarett Garner · SIGNEE ★3Zamari Ellis · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLElijiah Brown · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
LBRocky Shelton · SIGNEE ★3Shaka Heyward · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DBNate Thompson · SIGNEE ★3Ken Torain · SIGNEE ★3Jeremiah Lewis · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · DUKE
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———1006CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———5210CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————20CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————14CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————15CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————7CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————16CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE72nd72
BLUE-CHIP RATIO12%67
RECRUITING CLASS#63 · 1/16 BC53
CLASS RANK TREND-30 · 3 CYCLES0
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 3rd YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX20%43
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
PITTPAT NARDUZZI3TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
8181
PACE
3333
PASS RATE
8080
EXPLOSIVENESS
7979
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
3232
HAVOC
9696
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
DUKEDAVID CUTCLIFFE3TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESDUKE OFFENSEPITT OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBDUKE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
100
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSEPITTSBURGH DEFENSE
DUKE QUARTERBACKSn=60% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
GUNNAR HOLMBERGQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
DANIEL JONESQBRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
QUENTIN HARRISQBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
CHRIS KATRENICKQBTRUE FR
—3RD YR——★3—
DANIEL KARLINQBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 6
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
PITT DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 40 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——9%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——20%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLDUKE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7PITTSBURGH DEFENSE
DUKE OFFENSIVE LINEn=14RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JACK WOHLABAUGHCTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
ROBERT KRAELINGGRET
—4TH YR——★4—
CHRISTIAN HARRISOTRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
ZACH BAKERGRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
JULIAN SANTOSGRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
PITT FRONT-7n=25 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
KEYSHON CAMPDLRET
—4TH YR——★4—
AMIR WATTSDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
RASHAD WEAVERDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
DEWAYNE HENDRIXDLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
JAMES FOLSTON JR.DLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBDUKE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
52
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7PITTSBURGH DEFENSE
DUKE RUNNING BACKSn=1048% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MYLES HUDZICKRBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
RYAN WOLITZERRBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
MATAEO DURANTRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
ELIJAH DEVEAUXRBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
NICODEM PIERRERBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
PITT FRONT-72 ROOMS · 25 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——9%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEDUKE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYPITTSBURGH DEFENSE
DUKE PASS CATCHERSn=20RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JAKE BOBOWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
SCOTT BRACEYWRRET
—3RD YR——★4—
JARETT GARNERWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
CHRIS TAYLORWRRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
TREVON LEEWRRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
PITT SECONDARYn=15 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
COLIN JONOVDBTRUE FR
————UNR—
DANE JACKSONDBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
JAZZEE STOCKERDBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
DENNIS BRIGGSDBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
PHILLIPIE MOTLEYDBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
DUKE
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
PITT
SP+ OVERALL
5.0
2.7
FPI
6.4
4.8
ELO
1539
1595
TALENT
636
638
PRODUCTION
60
53
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+11
+18
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.12
0.15
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
DUKE
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
PITT
PASS RATE
52.0%
39.7%
PACE
25.4s
29.8s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
23%
19%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
52.4%
68.6%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
60.6%
56.5%
PLAYS / GAME
70.8
60.5
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
0.9%
2.2%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = DUKE, ORANGE = PITT) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2018, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE