SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2018 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2018›WEEK 13›LSU @ TA&M›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
OU @ WVU80
ASU @ ARIZ79
UL @ ULM76
FLA @ FSU74
HOU @ MEM72
COLO @ CAL72
WASH @ WSU71
PITT @ MIA71
MICH @ OSU70
BAY @ TTU67
GT @ UGA67
ARK @ MIZ66
ECU @ CIN66
UAB @ MTSU66
UK @ LOU66
LSU @ TA&M66
SYR @ BC65
NCSU @ UNC64
MSST @ MISS63
OKST @ TCU63
TROY @ APP62
TENN @ VAN62
KSU @ ISU62
BYU @ UTAH61
STAN @ UCLA60
AUB @ ALA60
NEB @ IOWA59
ORE @ ORST59
PUR @ IU59
ND @ USC59
USU @ BOIS58
TEX @ KU56
UCF @ USF56
MD @ PSU56
MINN @ WIS56
SC @ CLEM56
SJSU @ FRES56
NIU @ WMU55
UVA @ VT55
RUTG @ MSU55
WAKE @ DUKE54
WYO @ UNM54
CCU @ USA53
USM @ UTEP53
NEV @ UNLV52
SMU @ TLSA49
MRSH @ FIU48
CSU @ AF47
GASO @ GAST47
TEM @ CONN47
EMU @ KENT45
ARST @ TXST45
WKU @ LT42
NAVY @ TULN41
BUF @ BGSU40
AKR @ OHIO39
NMSU @ LIB36
CLT @ FAU36
BALL @ M-OH35
UNT @ UTSA35
CMU @ TOL34
ODU @ RICE34
ILL @ NU34
HAW @ SDSU31
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
LSU
TEXAS A&M
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2018
SAT 19:30 ET|KYLE FIELDCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP7|O/U45.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#6AP
17FPI
LSUSECLSU
72
9-3
96
65
91
17%
74
—
21.3
—
+3.0
HOME
#16AP
13FPI
TA&MSECTEXAS A&M
74
8-4
89
95
77
61%
92
—
24.3
—
-3.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2018CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALLSU72—TA&M74
CLOSED TA&M -3.0TOTAL 45.5LSU COVERED · 146 POINTS · OVER
LSU
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
TA&M
72
POINTS
74
496
TOTAL YARDS
521
281 (26-39)
PASSING
287 (23-51)
215 (51)
RUSHING
234 (56)
31
FIRST DOWNS
33
10-20
THIRD DOWN
11-22
1-1
FOURTH DOWN
2-3
28:30
TIME OF POSS.
30:01
10-70
PENALTIES
3-24
1
TURNOVERS
1
2
SACKS
6
6
QB HURRIES
1
LSU
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
TA&M
0.238
SEASON 0.185
EPA / PLAY
0.248
SEASON 0.287
46.7%
SEASON 41.2%
SUCCESS RATE
43.8%
SEASON 49.0%
12.2%
SEASON 14.9%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
17.1%
SEASON 20.2%
5.51
SEASON 5.59
YARDS / PLAY
5.12
SEASON 6.41
0.248
SEASON 0.132
EPA ALLOWED
0.238
SEASON 0.237
43.8%
SEASON 39.2%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
46.7%
SEASON 39.9%
17.1%
SEASON 15.1%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
12.2%
SEASON 16.5%
24.1%
SEASON 20.1%
STUFF RATE
20.0%
SEASON 21.2%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2018 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 13 FIELD n=64
MARKET
TOTAL45.5
SPREADTA&M -3.0
IMPLIED — LSU21.3
IMPLIED — TA&M24.3
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
57FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
58 / 64
BY ENVIRONMENT
23 / 64
DISAGREEMENT35 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 35 positions on a 64-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × FAST
LSU PACE25.3s
74
TA&M PACE23.8s
92
SHARED PACE24.6s
83
PLAY VOLUME147
83
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
LSU43CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
12
TEMPO
74
EXPLOSIVE12p
12
TEMPO74p
74
TA&M54CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
16
TEMPO
92
EXPLOSIVE16p
16
TEMPO92p
92
IS THE RECORD REAL2018 · FULL SEASON
LSURECORD MATCHES
9-3ACTUALvs8.7-3.3FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.3 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+10.8
LSU won 9 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 8.7. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TA&MRECORD MATCHES
8-4ACTUALvs7.9-4.1FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.1 W
ONE SCORE RECORD4-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+8.3
TEXAS A&M won 8 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 7.9. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERLSUTEXAS A&M2018 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Danny EtlingDRAFTED · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
RB0%J.D. MooreFB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
WR/TE0%Russell GageDRAFTED · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%Christian LaCoutureDE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%Corey ThompsonLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION5 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB0%Donte JacksonDRAFTED · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
RBChris Curry · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
WR/TETerrace Marshall · SIGNEE ★5Ja'Marr Chase · SIGNEE ★4Kenan Jones · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLChasen Hines · SIGNEE ★4Davin Cotton · SIGNEE ★4Dare Rosenthal · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
LBMicah Baskerville · SIGNEE ★4Damone Clark · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
DBKelvin Joseph · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · LSU
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———84CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———79CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————22CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————17CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————12CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————17CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————21CARRIED FROM 2017 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE96th96
BLUE-CHIP RATIO62%93
RECRUITING CLASS#15 · 11/20 BC89
CLASS RANK TREND-13 · 3 CYCLES24
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 3rd YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX30%88
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
TA&MJIMBO FISHERFIRST SEASON1 SEASON · 1 PROGRAMME
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
7373
PACE
8080
PASS RATE
6868
EXPLOSIVENESS
7171
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
3737
HAVOC
100100
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
LSUED ORGERON3TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESLSU OFFENSETA&M OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBLSU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
8
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSETEXAS A&M DEFENSE
LSU QUARTERBACKSn=492% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JOE BURROWQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
MYLES BRENNANQBRET
—4TH YR——★4—
ANDRE SALEQBTRUE FR
—2ND YR——★2—
JORDAN LOVINGQBTRUE FR
————★2—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TA&M DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 57 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——22%
LINEBACKERSLB
——20%
SECONDARYDB
——25%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLLSU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TEXAS A&M DEFENSE
LSU OFFENSIVE LINEn=17RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
GARRETT BRUMFIELDGRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
ADRIAN MAGEEOLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
JAKORI SAVAGEOLRET
—3RD YR——★3—
DONAVAUGHN CAMPBELLOLRET
—4TH YR——★4—
LLOYD CUSHENBERRY IIICRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TA&M FRONT-7n=33 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TYREE JOHNSONDLTRUE FR
—3RD YR——★3—
DAYLON MACKDLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
LANDIS DURHAMDLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
KINGSLEY KEKEDLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
JUSTIN MADUBUIKEDLRET
—3RD YR——★4—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBLSU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
7
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TEXAS A&M DEFENSE
LSU RUNNING BACKSn=993% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CHRIS CURRYRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
NICK BROSSETTERBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
LANARD FOURNETTERBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
TORY CARTERFBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
CLYDE EDWARDS-HELAIRERBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
SHOW ALL 9
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TA&M FRONT-72 ROOMS · 33 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——22%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——20%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TELSU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYTEXAS A&M DEFENSE
LSU PASS CATCHERSn=22RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DERRICK DILLONWRRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
STEPHEN SULLIVANTERET
—4TH YR——★4—
JUSTIN JEFFERSONWRRET
—3RD YR——★3—
DEE ANDERSONWRRET
—4TH YR——★4—
FOSTER MOREAUTERET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TA&M SECONDARYn=24 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TRAVON FULLERCBRET
—4TH YR——★4—
LARRY PRYORDBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
DEBIONE RENFRODBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
LEON O'NEAL JR.DBTRUE FR
————★4—
DONOVAN WILSONDBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
LSU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TA&M
SP+ OVERALL
24.2
21.6
FPI
14.9
15.8
ELO
1850
1858
TALENT
890
806
PRODUCTION
97
92
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−1
−4
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.62
0.38
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
LSU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TA&M
OFF EFFICIENCY
43
90
DEF EFFICIENCY
80
81
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
13
16
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
74
6
FINISHING DRIVES
62
68
FIELD POSITION
26
75
TURNOVER MARGIN
95
17
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
LSU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TA&M
PASS RATE
44.5%
46.9%
PACE
25.3s
23.8s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
11%
9%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
63.2%
63.3%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
60.7%
69.9%
PLAYS / GAME
71.2
75.5
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.3%
1.2%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = LSU, ORANGE = TA&M) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2018, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE