SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2025 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2025›WEEK 3›BC @ STAN›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
ARK @ MISS81
FLA @ LSU73
UGA @ TENN70
COLO @ HOU68
KSU @ ARIZ68
OHIO @ OSU67
TA&M @ ND65
DUKE @ TULN65
CLEM @ GT64
ORE @ NU63
PITT @ WVU63
USA @ AUB62
UL @ MIZ62
VAN @ SC62
AF @ USU62
SMU @ MOST60
ECU @ CCU60
MINN @ CAL60
CMU @ MICH59
CONN @ DEL59
USC @ PUR59
EMU @ UK59
WIS @ ALA58
WSU @ UNT58
NCSU @ WAKE57
UTEP @ TEX57
USF @ MIA55
ODU @ VT55
MASS @ IOWA55
UTAH @ WYO55
MEM @ TROY54
ORST @ TTU54
ISU @ ARST54
WMU @ ILL53
TXST @ ASU53
OU @ TEM52
NAVY @ TLSA50
JXST @ GASO49
FAU @ FIU47
UNM @ UCLA43
BC @ STAN42
APP @ USM40
NMSU @ LT39
AKR @ UAB37
MTSU @ NEV36
LIB @ BGSU34
BUF @ KENT21
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
BOSTON COLLEGE
STANFORD
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2025
SAT 22:30 ET|STANFORD STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP17|O/U44.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
88FPI
BCACCBOSTON COLLEGE
20
2-10
50
59
35
62%
82
81
29.3
-450
-14.0
HOME
—AP
83FPI
STANACCSTANFORD
30
4-8
67
23
68
19%
39
76
15.3
+335
+14.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2025CONSENSUS · BOVADA
FINALBC20—STAN30
CLOSED BC -14.0TOTAL 44.5STAN COVERED · 50 POINTS · OVER
BC
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
STAN
20
POINTS
30
389
TOTAL YARDS
409
333 (30-44)
PASSING
186 (13-22)
56 (23)
RUSHING
223 (34)
19
FIRST DOWNS
15
5-13
THIRD DOWN
5-14
0-1
FOURTH DOWN
0-1
28:16
TIME OF POSS.
31:44
5-30
PENALTIES
4-30
3
TURNOVERS
0
1
SACKS
2
3
QB HURRIES
4
BC
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
STAN
0.293
SEASON 0.206
EPA / PLAY
0.205
SEASON 0.112
43.8%
SEASON 43.5%
SUCCESS RATE
38.6%
SEASON 36.8%
10.9%
SEASON 13.1%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
12.3%
SEASON 10.8%
6.36
SEASON 5.73
YARDS / PLAY
7.00
SEASON 4.83
0.205
SEASON 0.292
EPA ALLOWED
0.293
SEASON 0.238
38.6%
SEASON 44.0%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
43.8%
SEASON 43.2%
12.3%
SEASON 15.6%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
10.9%
SEASON 15.4%
19.4%
SEASON 17.6%
STUFF RATE
21.1%
SEASON 17.1%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2025 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 3 FIELD n=47
MARKET
TOTAL44.5
SPREADBC -14.0
IMPLIED — BC29.3
IMPLIED — STAN15.3
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
44FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
41 / 47
BY ENVIRONMENT
34 / 47
DISAGREEMENT7 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 7 positions on a 47-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × MIDDLING
BC PACE26.1s
82
STAN PACE28.2s
39
SHARED PACE27.1s
61
PLAY VOLUME133
61
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
BC70CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
37
PROE
92
TEMPO
82
EXPLOSIVE37p
37
PROE92p
92
TEMPO82p
82
STAN45CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
39
PROE
58
TEMPO
39
EXPLOSIVE39p
39
PROE58p
58
TEMPO39p
39
IS THE RECORD REAL2025 · FULL SEASON
BCRECORD UNDERSTATES
2-10ACTUALvs4.3-7.8FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-2.3 W
ONE SCORE RECORD0-3
POINT MARGIN / GAME-7.3
BOSTON COLLEGE won 2 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 4.3. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
STANRECORD MATCHES
4-8ACTUALvs3.1-8.9FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.9 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME-10.3
STANFORD won 4 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 3.1. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERBOSTON COLLEGESTANFORD2025 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
RB77%Kye RobichauxRB · 46% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONTreshaun WardRB · 31% OF ROOM PARTICIPATION
LB69%Kam ArnoldLB · 36% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONJoe MarinaroLB · 21% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONSione HalaPORTAL · WEBER STATE · 12% OF ROOM PARTICIPATION
DL60%Donovan EzeiruakuDRAFTED · 21% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONNeto OkpalaDE · 13% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONCam HorsleyDT · 13% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
QB52%Tommy CastellanosPORTAL · FLORIDA STATE · 51% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
OL49%Drew KendallDRAFTED · 17% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONOzzy TrapiloDRAFTED · 17% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONJack ConleyOL · 14% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
WR/TE31%Kamari MoralesTE · 21% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB22%Khari JohnsonDB · 11% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION8 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
RBMekhi Dodd · SIGNEE ★3PARTIAL
LBE'Lla Boykin · PORTAL ★3 · WILSONJason Hewlett Jr. · PORTAL ★3 · MICHIGANGriffin Collins · SIGNEE ★31 MORE ARRIVALREFILLED
DLMicah Amedee · SIGNEE ★3Israel Oladipupo · SIGNEE ★3PARTIAL
QBDylan Lonergan · PORTAL ★3 · ALABAMAShaker Reisig · SIGNEE ★3REFILLED
OLAmir Johnson · PORTAL ★3 · MERRIMACKRobert Smith IV · SIGNEE ★3DJ Williams · SIGNEE ★3PARTIAL
WR/TEVJ Wilkins · PORTAL ★3 · CAMPBELLTy Lockwood · PORTAL ★3 · ALABAMASemaj Fleming · SIGNEE ★32 MORE ARRIVALSREFILLED
DBMarcus Upton · SIGNEE ★3Omarion Davis · SIGNEE ★3Ashton Cunningham · SIGNEE ★31 MORE ARRIVALREFILLED
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · BOSTON COLLEGE
CARRIED COMPOSITE
53.477 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
52.474 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
54.177 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB3636513463 OF 6 GRADED
RB4747838876 OF 7 GRADED
WR/TE555568712816 OF 28 GRADED
OL515160851713 OF 17 GRADED
DL383847572121 OF 21 GRADED
LB242461751512 OF 15 GRADED
DB505062782318 OF 23 GRADED
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE50th50
BLUE-CHIP RATIO7%37
RECRUITING CLASS#59 · 0/27 BC56
CLASS RANK TREND+2 · 3 CYCLES54
PORTAL NET BLUE-CHIP-1 · 15 IN / 19 OUT—
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 2nd YR—
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
STANFRANK REICHFIRST SEASON1 SEASON · 1 PROGRAMME
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
6868
PACE
3535
PASS RATE
8181
EXPLOSIVENESS
2323
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
4444
HAVOC
1818
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
BCBILL O'BRIEN2TH SEASON2 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
5757
PACE
6565
PASS RATE
5454
EXPLOSIVENESS
4747
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
9191
HAVOC
2020
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESBC OFFENSESTAN OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBBOSTON COLLEGE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
119OF 136
TAL
51
PERF
36
RET
34
NATIONAL
55OF 136
RET
83
FULL DEFENSESTANFORD DEFENSE
BC QUARTERBACKSn=666% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
GRAYSON JAMESQBRET
474TH YR8628★3-16
SHAKER REISIGQBTRUE FR
471ST YR2845★3—
DYLAN LONERGANQBPORTAL · ALABAMA
474TH YR6564★3+32
ENZO ARJONAQBTRUE FR
304TH YR——UNR—
SHANE HANAFINQBRET
303RD YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 6
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
STAN DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 55 PLAYERS14% VACATED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
5498%7%
LINEBACKERSLB
4380%18%
SECONDARYDB
5182%0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLBOSTON COLLEGE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
67OF 136
TAL
60
PERF
51
RET
85
DL
58OF 136
DL RET
98
LB
94OF 136
LB RET
80
FRONT-7STANFORD DEFENSE
BC OFFENSIVE LINEn=1715% VACATED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MICHAEL CROUNSEOLRET
563RD YR5856★3+33
LOGAN TAYLOROLRET
534TH YR9985★3-11
ERYX DAUGHERTYOLRET
573RD YR6285★3+37
KEVIN CLINEOLRET
524TH YR719★2-25
JUDAH PRUITTOLRET
502ND YR2560★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
STAN FRONT-7n=36 · 2 ROOMS9% VACATED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CLAY PATTERSONDLRET
884TH YR6564★3+31
MATT ROSELBRET
794TH YR8146★3-1
OMAR STAPLESDLRET
603RD YR5359★3+14
JACOBI MURRAYDLRET
522ND YR3070★3—
KOLE BRIEHLERDTTRUE FR
521ST YR1477★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBBOSTON COLLEGE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
89OF 136
TAL
83
PERF
47
RET
88
DL
58OF 136
DL RET
98
LB
94OF 136
LB RET
80
FRONT-7STANFORD DEFENSE
BC RUNNING BACKSn=712% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JORDAN MCDONALDRBRET
524TH YR7589★3+8
TURBO RICHARDRBRET
503RD YR7985★30
ANTHONY FERRUCCIRBRET
503RD YR13—UNR—
ALEX BROOMERBRET
493RD YR6359★3-25
BO MACCORMACK IIIRBTRUE FR
482ND YR2650★3-47
SHOW ALL 7
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
STAN FRONT-72 ROOMS · 36 PLAYERS10% VACATED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.555498%7%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.454380%18%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEBOSTON COLLEGE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
60OF 136
TAL
68
PERF
55
RET
71
DB
74OF 136
DB RET
82
SECONDARYSTANFORD DEFENSE
BC PASS CATCHERSn=2829% VACATED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
KAELAN CHUDZINSKITETRUE FR
782ND YR5552★3+47
LEWIS BONDWRRET
754TH YR10053★3+19
REED HARRISWRRET
584TH YR9499★4+33
JEREMIAH FRANKLINTERET
564TH YR9570★3+1
LUKE MCLAUGHLINWRRET
524TH YR37—UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
STAN SECONDARYn=19 · 1 ROOM18% VACATED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
SCOTTY EDWARDSSRET
664TH YR9632★3+12
COLLIN WRIGHTCBRET
634TH YR9873★3-12
CHARLIE ECKHARDTSRET
602ND YR5234★3+36
SAM NEELY IIICBPORTAL · WAKE FOREST
522ND YR2645★3—
DARRIUS DAVISSRET
523RD YR5860★3-4
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
BC
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
STAN
SCOUT TEAM GRADE
42.9
46.4
— OFFENSE
48.2
43.3
— DEFENSE
37.6
49.5
SP+ OVERALL
-8.5
-11.8
FPI
-5.2
-3.6
ELO
1359
1335
TALENT
650
707
PRODUCTION
29
18
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+21
+49
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.07
0.11
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
BC
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
STAN
OFF EFFICIENCY
56
10
DEF EFFICIENCY
34
39
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
38
39
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
9
25
FINISHING DRIVES
17
19
FIELD POSITION
81
99
TURNOVER MARGIN
18
39
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
BC
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
STAN
PASS RATE
58.8%
54.6%
PROE
+9.0
+1.9
PACE
26.1s
28.2s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
31%
24%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
50.2%
58.5%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
79.8%
80.9%
PLAYS / GAME
69.0
63.9
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
2.2%
0.5%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = BC, ORANGE = STAN) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2025, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE