SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2019 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2019›WEEK 3›FUR @ VT›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
UNC @ WAKE74
AF @ COLO72
IOWA @ ISU72
STAN @ UCF70
CLEM @ SYR70
TTU @ ARIZ69
MD @ TEM68
ECU @ NAVY68
PITT @ PSU67
FLA @ UK67
USC @ BYU66
WSU @ HOU64
NCSU @ WVU64
ARST @ UGA63
OU @ UCLA63
UNM @ ND62
KENT @ AUB61
AKR @ CMU60
FSU @ UVA60
OSU @ IU59
KSU @ MSST59
ALA @ SC59
MEM @ USA58
LOU @ WKU58
ASU @ MSU58
BUF @ LIB58
TCU @ PUR56
GAST @ WMU55
KU @ BC52
FAU @ BALL52
OHIO @ MRSH52
UNLV @ NU51
ARMY @ UTSA51
TEX @ RICE50
SDSU @ NMSU50
M-OH @ CIN49
DUKE @ MTSU49
TXST @ SMU49
GASO @ MINN48
USM @ TROY48
CSU @ ARK46
UNT @ CAL46
OKST @ TLSA45
HAW @ WASH45
NIU @ NEB45
MASS @ CLT40
EMU @ ILL39
LT @ BGSU33
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
FURMAN
VIRGINIA TECH
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2019
SAT 12:00 ET|LANE STADIUMNONCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP|O/U64.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
—FPI
FURSOCONFURMAN
17
8-5
0
0
0
0%
0
—
20.3
—
+24.0
HOME
—AP
48FPI
VTACCVIRGINIA TECH
24
8-4
80
66
53
75%
55
70
44.3
—
-24.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2019CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALFUR17—VT24
CLOSED VT -24.0TOTAL 64.5FUR COVERED · 41 POINTS · UNDER
FUR
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
VT
17
POINTS
24
231
TOTAL YARDS
350
68 (9-16)
PASSING
123 (17-21)
163 (42)
RUSHING
227 (43)
12
FIRST DOWNS
18
5-14
THIRD DOWN
8-15
0-0
FOURTH DOWN
0-0
30:12
TIME OF POSS.
29:48
3-15
PENALTIES
6-40
2
TURNOVERS
2
8
SACKS
4
4
QB HURRIES
5
FUR
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
VT
—
SEASON 0.628
EPA / PLAY
—
SEASON 0.227
—
SEASON 50.8%
SUCCESS RATE
—
SEASON 41.9%
—
SEASON 26.2%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
—
SEASON 15.3%
—
SEASON 8.48
YARDS / PLAY
—
SEASON 5.93
—
SEASON 0.467
EPA ALLOWED
—
SEASON 0.171
—
SEASON 63.5%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
—
SEASON 36.7%
—
SEASON 16.2%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
—
SEASON 14.1%
—
SEASON 15.8%
STUFF RATE
—
SEASON 21.6%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2019 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT2 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 3 FIELD n=48
MARKET
TOTAL64.5
SPREADVT -24.0
IMPLIED — FUR20.3
IMPLIED — VT44.3
PACE COLLISION
UNMEASURED × MIDDLING
FUR PACE27.7s
—
VT PACE26.6s
55
SHARED PACE27.1s
—
PLAY VOLUME133
—
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
VT38CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
22
TEMPO
55
EXPLOSIVE22p
22
TEMPO55p
55
IS THE RECORD REAL2019 · FULL SEASON
VTRECORD MATCHES
8-4ACTUALvs7.8-4.2FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.2 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+7.3
VIRGINIA TECH won 8 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 7.8. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERFURMANVIRGINIA TECH2019 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
LB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TENO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
LBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · FURMAN
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———1001CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
WR/TE————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
OL————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
DL————0NO GRADING EVIDENCE
LB————1CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————1CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
RECRUITING CLASS#180 · 0/8 BC0
CLASS RANK TREND+39 · 3 CYCLES100
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
VTJUSTIN FUENTE4TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
FUR—FIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESFUR OFFENSEVT OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBFURMAN OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
100
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSEVIRGINIA TECH DEFENSE
FUR QUARTERBACKSn=10% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DARREN GRAINGERQBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
VT DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 54 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
——27%
SECONDARYDB
——14%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLFURMAN OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7VIRGINIA TECH DEFENSE
FUR OFFENSIVE LINEn=0RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE BY GRADE
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
VT FRONT-7n=33 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JAEVON BECTONDLTRUE FR
—1ST YR——★3—
ROB PORCHERDERET
—4TH YR——UNR—
NORELL POLLARDDLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
TYJUAN GARBUTTDLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
JAYLEN GRIFFINDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBFURMAN OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7VIRGINIA TECH DEFENSE
FUR RUNNING BACKSn=0RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
BACKFIELD BY GRADE
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
VT FRONT-72 ROOMS · 33 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——27%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEFURMAN OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYVIRGINIA TECH DEFENSE
FUR PASS CATCHERSn=0RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS BY GRADE
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
VT SECONDARYn=21 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CALEB FARLEYDBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
DEVON HUNTERDBRET
—3RD YR——★4—
NADIR THOMPSONDBTRUE FR
—2ND YR——★3—
CHAMARRI CONNERDBRET
—4TH YR——★4—
JERMAINE WALLERDBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = FUR, ORANGE = VT) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2019, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE