SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2019 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2019›WEEK 3›TCU @ PUR›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
UNC @ WAKE74
AF @ COLO72
IOWA @ ISU72
STAN @ UCF70
CLEM @ SYR70
TTU @ ARIZ69
MD @ TEM68
ECU @ NAVY68
PITT @ PSU67
FLA @ UK67
USC @ BYU66
WSU @ HOU64
NCSU @ WVU64
ARST @ UGA63
OU @ UCLA63
UNM @ ND62
KENT @ AUB61
AKR @ CMU60
FSU @ UVA60
OSU @ IU59
KSU @ MSST59
ALA @ SC59
MEM @ USA58
LOU @ WKU58
ASU @ MSU58
BUF @ LIB58
TCU @ PUR56
GAST @ WMU55
KU @ BC52
FAU @ BALL52
OHIO @ MRSH52
UNLV @ NU51
ARMY @ UTSA51
TEX @ RICE50
SDSU @ NMSU50
M-OH @ CIN49
DUKE @ MTSU49
TXST @ SMU49
GASO @ MINN48
USM @ TROY48
CSU @ ARK46
UNT @ CAL46
OKST @ TLSA45
HAW @ WASH45
NIU @ NEB45
MASS @ CLT40
EMU @ ILL39
LT @ BGSU33
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
TCU
PURDUE
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2019
SAT 19:30 ET|ROSS-ADE STADIUMNONCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP15|O/U53.0COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
37FPI
TCUB12TCU
34
5-7
79
29
83
69%
88
81
28.0
—
-3.0
HOME
—AP
63FPI
PURB1GPURDUE
13
4-8
64
76
39
41%
78
91
25.0
—
+3.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2019CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALTCU34—PUR13
CLOSED TCU -3.0TOTAL 53.0TCU COVERED · 47 POINTS · UNDER
TCU
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
PUR
34
POINTS
13
421
TOTAL YARDS
204
75 (8-24)
PASSING
181 (13-29)
346 (58)
RUSHING
23 (25)
23
FIRST DOWNS
8
6-18
THIRD DOWN
4-15
2-2
FOURTH DOWN
0-1
40:33
TIME OF POSS.
19:27
7-60
PENALTIES
2-20
1
TURNOVERS
2
6
SACKS
6
0
QB HURRIES
0
TCU
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
PUR
—
SEASON 0.181
EPA / PLAY
—
SEASON 0.215
—
SEASON 41.9%
SUCCESS RATE
—
SEASON 42.1%
—
SEASON 14.7%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
—
SEASON 16.0%
—
SEASON 5.57
YARDS / PLAY
—
SEASON 5.80
—
SEASON 0.165
EPA ALLOWED
—
SEASON 0.268
—
SEASON 37.2%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
—
SEASON 44.0%
—
SEASON 14.6%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
—
SEASON 17.4%
—
SEASON 22.6%
STUFF RATE
—
SEASON 19.6%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2019 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 3 FIELD n=48
MARKET
TOTAL53.0
SPREADTCU -3.0
IMPLIED — TCU28.0
IMPLIED — PUR25.0
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
52FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
31 / 48
BY ENVIRONMENT
25 / 48
DISAGREEMENT6 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 6 positions on a 48-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × FAST
TCU PACE24.6s
88
PUR PACE25.3s
78
SHARED PACE25.0s
83
PLAY VOLUME144
83
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
TCU45CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
2
TEMPO
88
EXPLOSIVE2p
2
TEMPO88p
88
PUR59CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
40
TEMPO
78
EXPLOSIVE40p
40
TEMPO78p
78
IS THE RECORD REAL2019 · FULL SEASON
TCURECORD UNDERSTATES
5-7ACTUALvs7.0-5.0FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-2.0 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-6
POINT MARGIN / GAME+3.9
TCU won 5 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 7.0. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
PURRECORD MATCHES
4-8ACTUALvs4.8-7.2FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.8 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-4
POINT MARGIN / GAME-4.8
PURDUE won 4 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 4.8. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERTCUPURDUE2019 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Grayson MuehlsteinQB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%Cole NovakTE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION6 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%Trey ElliottG · SHARE NOT MEASURED
DL0%L.J. CollierDRAFTED · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%Arico EvansLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION5 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB0%Ridwan IssahakuS · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TEBlair Conwright · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLAndrew Coker · SIGNEE ★3Brannon Brown · SIGNEE ★3Marcus Williams · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DLJaquaze Sorrells · SIGNEE ★4Karter Johnson · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
LBDylan Jordan · SIGNEE ★3Zach Marcheselli · SIGNEE ★3Wyatt Harris · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DBDonavann Collins · SIGNEE ★3Deshawn McCuin · SIGNEE ★3Millard Bradford · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · TCU
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———697CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———1009CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————26CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————19CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————17CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————11CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————25CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE79th79
BLUE-CHIP RATIO21%77
RECRUITING CLASS#33 · 5/23 BC76
CLASS RANK TREND-5 · 3 CYCLES40
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 4th YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX23%23
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
PURJEFF BROHM3TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 2 PROGRAMMES
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
8585
PACE
6262
PASS RATE
7575
EXPLOSIVENESS
2626
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
2121
HAVOC
6666
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
TCUGARY PATTERSON4TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESTCU OFFENSEPUR OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
69
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSEPURDUE DEFENSE
TCU QUARTERBACKSn=731% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MAX DUGGANQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
ALEX DELTONQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
MIKE COLLINSQBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
MATTHEW BALDWINQBTRUE FR
—1ST YR——★4—
GRANT BEUCLERQBTRUE FR
—2ND YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 7
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
PUR DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 47 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——7%
LINEBACKERSLB
——7%
SECONDARYDB
——6%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7PURDUE DEFENSE
TCU OFFENSIVE LINEn=19RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
COY MCMILLONCRET
—4TH YR——★3—
LUCAS NIANGOTRET
—4TH YR——★3—
CORDEL IWUAGWUGRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
QUAZZEL WHITEOLRET
—3RD YR——★3—
DAVID BOLISOMIOTRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
PUR FRONT-7n=29 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
GIOVANNI REVIEREDERET
—2ND YR——★3—
KAI HIGGINSDERET
—4TH YR——UNR—
ANTHONY WATTSDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
JEFF MARKSDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
BRANSON DEENDTTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
100
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7PURDUE DEFENSE
TCU RUNNING BACKSn=90% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DAIMARQUA FOSTERRBTRUE FR
—2ND YR——★4—
SEWO OLONILUARBRET
—4TH YR——★4—
DARWIN BARLOWRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
EMARI DEMERCADORBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
DARIUS ANDERSONRBRET
—4TH YR——★4—
SHOW ALL 9
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
PUR FRONT-72 ROOMS · 29 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——7%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——7%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TETCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYPURDUE DEFENSE
TCU PASS CATCHERSn=26RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TE'VAILANCE HUNTWRRET
—4TH YR——★4—
BLAIR CONWRIGHTWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
ARTAYVIOUS LYNNTERET
—4TH YR——★3—
AL'DONTRE DAVISWRRET
—4TH YR——★3—
JALEN REAGORWRRET
—3RD YR——★4—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
PUR SECONDARYn=18 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
KENNETH MAJORCBRET
—3RD YR——★2—
DEDRICK MACKEYCBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
SIMEON SMILEYCBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
NAVON MOSLEYSRET
—4TH YR——★3—
BRENNAN THIENEMANSRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
TCU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
PUR
SP+ OVERALL
6.7
-0.7
FPI
7.3
0.0
ELO
1625
1488
TALENT
692
607
PRODUCTION
68
50
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+10
+11
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.21
0.09
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
TCU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
PUR
PASS RATE
47.9%
63.7%
PACE
24.6s
25.3s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
10%
18%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
61.2%
43.9%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
66.0%
78.3%
PLAYS / GAME
73.2
71.1
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.4%
0.0%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = TCU, ORANGE = PUR) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2019, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE