SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2019 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2019›WEEK 9›UCF @ TEM›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
ND @ MICH77
MIA @ PITT76
SC @ TENN75
OHIO @ BALL74
IOWA @ NU73
PSU @ MSU72
IU @ NEB71
TULN @ NAVY71
TROY @ GAST71
USU @ AF71
USC @ COLO69
UVA @ LOU69
BC @ CLEM68
EMU @ TOL67
CMU @ BUF67
ARK @ ALA67
SJSU @ ARMY66
DUKE @ UNC64
WSU @ ORE64
MSST @ TA&M63
AUB @ LSU63
MIZ @ UK63
UCF @ TEM62
CAL @ UTAH62
WKU @ MRSH60
SDSU @ UNLV60
WIS @ OSU59
UNT @ CLT59
OKST @ ISU57
HAW @ UNM57
USM @ RICE56
SYR @ FSU56
APP @ USA55
ILL @ PUR55
OU @ KSU55
TEX @ TCU55
USF @ ECU55
MEM @ TLSA55
ASU @ UCLA55
ARIZ @ STAN52
SMU @ HOU51
FIU @ MTSU51
TTU @ KU51
FAU @ ODU50
MD @ MINN50
TXST @ ARST49
LIB @ RUTG42
NMSU @ GASO42
NEV @ WYO41
M-OH @ KENT41
CSU @ FRES40
AKR @ NIU37
BGSU @ WMU35
LT @ UTEP29
CONN @ MASS26
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
UCF
TEMPLE
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2019
SAT 19:00 ET|LINCOLN FINANCIAL FIELDCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP19|O/U61.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#24AP
21FPI
UCFB12UCF
63
9-3
61
78
78
81%
97
36
36.5
—
-11.5
HOME
—AP
85FPI
TEMAACTEMPLE
21
8-4
42
31
86
57%
81
33
25.0
—
+11.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2019CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALUCF63—TEM21
CLOSED UCF -11.5TOTAL 61.5UCF COVERED · 84 POINTS · OVER
UCF
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
TEM
63
POINTS
21
614
TOTAL YARDS
266
229 (12-23)
PASSING
221 (16-31)
385 (48)
RUSHING
45 (40)
24
FIRST DOWNS
12
6-13
THIRD DOWN
7-18
1-1
FOURTH DOWN
0-2
26:41
TIME OF POSS.
33:19
9-68
PENALTIES
6-32
1
TURNOVERS
2
8
SACKS
4
0
QB HURRIES
0
UCF
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
TEM
0.574
SEASON 0.349
EPA / PLAY
0.045
SEASON 0.199
44.6%
SEASON 45.3%
SUCCESS RATE
29.0%
SEASON 43.1%
27.7%
SEASON 18.6%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
5.8%
SEASON 13.6%
9.22
SEASON 7.06
YARDS / PLAY
3.86
SEASON 5.77
0.045
SEASON 0.089
EPA ALLOWED
0.574
SEASON 0.127
29.0%
SEASON 35.9%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
44.6%
SEASON 38.5%
5.8%
SEASON 13.3%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
27.7%
SEASON 13.2%
33.3%
SEASON 26.2%
STUFF RATE
19.5%
SEASON 20.2%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2019 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 9 FIELD n=55
MARKET
TOTAL61.5
SPREADUCF -11.5
IMPLIED — UCF36.5
IMPLIED — TEM25.0
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
45FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
11 / 55
BY ENVIRONMENT
36 / 55
DISAGREEMENT25 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 25 positions on a 55-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × FAST
UCF PACE23.4s
97
TEM PACE25.1s
81
SHARED PACE24.3s
89
PLAY VOLUME149
89
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
UCF97CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
98
TEMPO
97
EXPLOSIVE98p
98
TEMPO97p
97
TEM67CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
52
TEMPO
81
EXPLOSIVE52p
52
TEMPO81p
81
IS THE RECORD REAL2019 · FULL SEASON
UCFRECORD MATCHES
9-3ACTUALvs9.8-2.2FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.8 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-3
POINT MARGIN / GAME+20.2
UCF won 9 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 9.8. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEMRECORD MATCHES
8-4ACTUALvs7.1-4.9FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.9 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-1
POINT MARGIN / GAME+3.9
TEMPLE won 8 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 7.1. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERUCFTEMPLE2019 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%Taj McGowanRB · SHARE NOT MEASURED
WR/TE0%Tristan PaytonWR · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%Joey ConnorsDL · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%Pat JasinskiLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB0%Trey GreenDB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
WR/TEAmari Johnson · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLKeenan Hester · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
LBTatum Bethune · SIGNEE ★3Jeremiah Jean-Baptiste · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DBJarrad Baker · SIGNEE ★3Justin Menard · SIGNEE ★3Ryan O'Keefe · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · UCF
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———266CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———836CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————24CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————20CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————29CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————13CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————21CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE61st61
BLUE-CHIP RATIO4%46
RECRUITING CLASS#59 · 0/21 BC56
CLASS RANK TREND-4 · 3 CYCLES42
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 2nd YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX30%52
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
TEMROD CAREYFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
UCFJOSH HEUPEL2TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
6969
PACE
9292
PASS RATE
3535
EXPLOSIVENESS
3030
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
4949
HAVOC
9191
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESUCF OFFENSETEM OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBUCF OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
26
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSETEMPLE DEFENSE
UCF QUARTERBACKSn=674% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
QUADRY JONESQBRET
—3RD YR——★2—
DILLON GABRIELQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
D.J. MACK JR.QBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
BRANDON WIMBUSHQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
HAYDEN KINGSTONQBRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 6
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEM DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 57 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——5%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLUCF OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TEMPLE DEFENSE
UCF OFFENSIVE LINEn=20RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE BY GRADE
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TREVOR ELBERTOLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
JAKE BROWNOLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
PARKER BOUDREAUXOLRET
—3RD YR——★3—
KYLE BACKOLRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
COLE SCHNEIDEROLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEM FRONT-7n=34 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
ARNOLD EBIKETIEDERET
—4TH YR——★3—
ZACK MESDAYDERET
—4TH YR——UNR—
DEANDRE KELLYDERET
—4TH YR——UNR—
DANA LEVINEDERET
—4TH YR——UNR—
DANIEL ARCHIBONGDTRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBUCF OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
83
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TEMPLE DEFENSE
UCF RUNNING BACKSn=617% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
GREG MCCRAERBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
BENTAVIOUS THOMPSONRBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
ADRIAN KILLINS JR.RBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
TRILION COLESRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
OTIS ANDERSONRBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW ALL 6
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEM FRONT-72 ROOMS · 34 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——5%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEUCF OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYTEMPLE DEFENSE
UCF PASS CATCHERSn=24RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JARRAD BAKERWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
GABRIEL DAVISWRRET
—3RD YR——★3—
MARLON WILLIAMSWRRET
—4TH YR——★3—
JONATHON MACCOLLISTERTERET
—2ND YR——★3—
MARLON WILLIAMSWRTRUE FR
————★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEM SECONDARYn=23 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
AYRON MONROESTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
LINWOOD CRUMPDBRET
—4TH YR——★2—
AMIR TYLERSRET
—4TH YR——★3—
KEYVONE BRUTONSRET
—3RD YR——★3—
BENNY WALLSSRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
UCF
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TEM
SP+ OVERALL
19.1
3.2
FPI
12.6
-4.7
ELO
1886
1367
TALENT
599
489
PRODUCTION
90
61
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−31
−22
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.04
0.05
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
UCF
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TEM
PASS RATE
48.4%
51.5%
PACE
23.4s
25.1s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
29%
31%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
57.3%
57.1%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
60.7%
71.1%
PLAYS / GAME
76.9
71.6
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
2.3%
0.8%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = UCF, ORANGE = TEM) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2019, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE