SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2020 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2020›WEEK 9›MEM @ CIN›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
NU @ IOWA80
UCF @ HOU75
TCU @ BAY75
TEX @ OKST75
LSU @ AUB74
VT @ LOU74
TROY @ ARST69
MIZ @ FLA69
ARK @ TA&M69
BC @ CLEM68
IU @ RUTG67
RICE @ USM65
NAVY @ SMU65
OSU @ PSU64
MSU @ MICH63
ND @ GT63
MSST @ ALA63
USA @ GASO62
SDSU @ USU62
UNC @ UVA61
UL @ TXST61
MEM @ CIN59
CCU @ GAST59
OU @ TTU59
HAW @ WYO58
UTSA @ FAU58
UGA @ UK57
KSU @ WVU56
ISU @ KU56
TEM @ TULN56
PUR @ ILL55
MISS @ VAN55
BOIS @ AF55
APP @ ULM54
CSU @ FRES51
SJSU @ UNM50
MINN @ MD47
ECU @ TLSA45
WAKE @ SYR43
WKU @ BYU42
CLT @ DUKE41
UAB @ LT37
NEV @ UNLV31
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
MEMPHIS
CINCINNATI
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2020
SAT 12:00 ET|NIPPERT STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP4|O/U57.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
69FPI
MEMAACMEMPHIS
10
7-3
54
88
57
74%
86
25
25.5
—
+6.5
HOME
#8AP
14FPI
CINB12CINCINNATI
49
9-0
58
43
71
67%
30
51
32.0
—
-6.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2020CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALMEM10—CIN49
CLOSED CIN -6.5TOTAL 57.5CIN COVERED · 59 POINTS · OVER
MEM
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
CIN
10
POINTS
49
319
TOTAL YARDS
513
316 (18-35)
PASSING
271 (21-26)
3 (29)
RUSHING
242 (41)
15
FIRST DOWNS
28
4-16
THIRD DOWN
6-11
0-3
FOURTH DOWN
1-1
25:10
TIME OF POSS.
34:50
4-50
PENALTIES
5-40
1
TURNOVERS
1
2
SACKS
6
0
QB HURRIES
1
MEM
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
CIN
-0.064
SEASON 0.244
EPA / PLAY
0.433
SEASON 0.316
29.5%
SEASON 42.3%
SUCCESS RATE
49.2%
SEASON 45.5%
11.5%
SEASON 17.7%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
18.0%
SEASON 17.6%
5.08
SEASON 6.17
YARDS / PLAY
7.33
SEASON 6.47
0.433
SEASON 0.270
EPA ALLOWED
-0.064
SEASON 0.053
49.2%
SEASON 43.6%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
29.5%
SEASON 34.6%
18.0%
SEASON 14.1%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
11.5%
SEASON 11.5%
11.8%
SEASON 17.5%
STUFF RATE
35.0%
SEASON 21.1%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2020 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 9 FIELD n=43
MARKET
TOTAL57.5
SPREADCIN -6.5
IMPLIED — MEM25.5
IMPLIED — CIN32.0
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
47FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
23 / 43
BY ENVIRONMENT
25 / 43
DISAGREEMENT2 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 2 positions on a 43-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × SLOW
MEM PACE24.8s
86
CIN PACE27.4s
30
SHARED PACE26.1s
58
PLAY VOLUME139
58
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
MEM89CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
93
TEMPO
86
EXPLOSIVE93p
93
TEMPO86p
86
CIN57CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
84
TEMPO
30
EXPLOSIVE84p
84
TEMPO30p
30
IS THE RECORD REAL2020 · FULL SEASON
MEMRECORD OVERSTATES
7-3ACTUALvs5.4-4.6FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+1.6 W
ONE SCORE RECORD4-1
POINT MARGIN / GAME+1.9
MEMPHIS won 7 of 10 against a scoring profile describing 5.4. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
CINRECORD MATCHES
9-0ACTUALvs8.0-1.0FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+1.0 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-0
POINT MARGIN / GAME+23.3
CINCINNATI won 9 of 9 against a scoring profile describing 8.0. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERMEMPHISCINCINNATI2020 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%Patrick Taylor Jr.RB · SHARE NOT MEASURED
WR/TE0%Kedarian JonesWR · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%Bryce HuffDE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%Austin HallLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
DB0%Josh PerryPORTAL · SOUTHERN MISS · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBBrandon Thomas · SIGNEE ★3Kory Gainwell · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
WR/TEKhi Mathieu · SIGNEE ★3Marcayll Jones · SIGNEE ★3Kobe Webster · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLCam Jackson · SIGNEE ★3Kajuan Robinson · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
LBDavian Mayo · SIGNEE ★3Trey Wright · SIGNEEINTACT
DBDevonte Golden-Nelson · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · MEMPHIS
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———1006CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———2510CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————23CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————20CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————21CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————15CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————20CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE54th54
BLUE-CHIP RATIO9%64
RECRUITING CLASS#67 · 0/16 BC50
CLASS RANK TREND+14 · 3 CYCLES78
COACH STATUSNEW HEAD COACH—
DEV TRANSITION MIX39%71
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
CINLUKE FICKELL4TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 2 PROGRAMMES
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
5252
PACE
2424
PASS RATE
5353
EXPLOSIVENESS
1515
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
2525
HAVOC
3434
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
MEMRYAN SILVERFIELDFIRST SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
8383
PACE
8585
PASS RATE
7474
EXPLOSIVENESS
7070
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
6262
HAVOC
7373
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESMEM OFFENSECIN OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBMEMPHIS OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
100
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSECINCINNATI DEFENSE
MEM QUARTERBACKSn=60% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
KEILON BROWNQBTRUE FR
—2ND YR——★3—
BRADY WHITEQBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
CONNOR ADAIRQBRET
—3RD YR——★2—
MARKEVION QUINNQBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
PETER PARRISHQBTRUE FR
—2ND YR——★3—
SHOW ALL 6
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
CIN DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 59 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
——6%
SECONDARYDB
——0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLMEMPHIS OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7CINCINNATI DEFENSE
MEM OFFENSIVE LINEn=20RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DYLAN PARHAMOLRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
EVAN FIELDSOLRET
—2ND YR——UNR—
OBINNA EZEOTRET
—3RD YR——★4—
JOSH NORTHCUTTOLRET
—2ND YR——UNR—
JARED EDWARDSOLRET
—2ND YR——★2—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
CIN FRONT-7n=39 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CURTIS BROOKSDTRET
—4TH YR——★2—
JABARI TAYLORDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
MICHAEL PITTSDERET
—4TH YR——★3—
ETHAN TUCKYDTRET
—4TH YR——★3—
ELIJAH PONDERDTRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBMEMPHIS OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
25
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7CINCINNATI DEFENSE
MEM RUNNING BACKSn=1075% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MARQUAVIUS WEAVERRBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
BRANDON THOMASRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
RODRIGUES CLARKRBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
TIMOTHY TAYLORRBRET
—3RD YR——★2—
KYLAN WATKINSRBRET
—3RD YR——★2—
SHOW ALL 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
CIN FRONT-72 ROOMS · 39 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——6%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEMEMPHIS OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYCINCINNATI DEFENSE
MEM PASS CATCHERSn=23RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CALVIN AUSTIN IIIWRRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
JAVON IVORYWRRET
—4TH YR——★3—
CADEN PRIESKORNTETRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
TYLER MOOREWRRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
SEAN DYKESTERET
—4TH YR——★2—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
CIN SECONDARYn=20 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JAMES WIGGINSSRET
—4TH YR——★3—
DARRICK FORRESTSRET
—4TH YR——★3—
COBY BRYANTCBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
JUSTIN HARRISSRET
—4TH YR——★3—
BRYAN COOKSRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
MEM
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
CIN
SP+ OVERALL
5.7
18.6
FPI
0.6
14.8
ELO
1582
1926
TALENT
587
601
PRODUCTION
67
94
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−16
−38
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.09
0.09
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
MEM
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
CIN
PASS RATE
54.6%
42.8%
PACE
24.8s
27.4s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
28%
24%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
53.7%
61.0%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
71.2%
52.4%
PLAYS / GAME
72.7
65.8
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.1%
1.7%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = MEM, ORANGE = CIN) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2020, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE