SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2020 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2020›WEEK 14›LT @ UNT›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
HAW @ SJSU77
TA&M @ AUB73
MEM @ TULN72
CSU @ SDSU71
SC @ UK70
FAU @ GASO69
WSU @ USC69
ORE @ CAL68
OSU @ MSU67
PSU @ RUTG67
WVU @ ISU67
ORST @ UTAH67
CLEM @ VT66
BC @ UVA64
COLO @ ARIZ64
MIA @ DUKE63
AF @ USU61
NEB @ PUR61
IOWA @ ILL61
FLA @ TENN61
UL @ APP60
OKST @ TCU60
ULM @ ARST60
STAN @ WASH60
ALA @ LSU59
ARK @ MIZ58
TEX @ KSU58
BALL @ CMU58
SYR @ ND58
IU @ WIS58
WKU @ CLT58
TLSA @ NAVY56
UCLA @ ASU56
BYU @ CCU53
FRES @ NEV53
BAY @ OU51
LT @ UNT50
GT @ NCSU50
EMU @ WMU49
TROY @ USA48
RICE @ MRSH42
KU @ TTU39
TOL @ NIU38
BGSU @ AKR38
WYO @ UNM37
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
LOUISIANA TECH
NORTH TEXAS
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2020
THU 18:00 ET|DATCU STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP6|O/U65.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
108FPI
LTSBCLOUISIANA TECH
42
5-4
42
38
10
46%
58
—
33.3
—
-1.0
HOME
—AP
120FPI
UNTAACNORTH TEXAS
31
4-5
36
27
12
49%
93
—
32.3
—
+1.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2020CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALLT42—UNT31
CLOSED LT -1.0TOTAL 65.5LT COVERED · 73 POINTS · OVER
LT
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
UNT
42
POINTS
31
341
TOTAL YARDS
386
158 (19-31)
PASSING
231 (17-30)
183 (50)
RUSHING
155 (41)
24
FIRST DOWNS
19
8-17
THIRD DOWN
6-14
3-3
FOURTH DOWN
1-4
36:19
TIME OF POSS.
23:41
4-33
PENALTIES
11-82
1
TURNOVERS
1
4
SACKS
2
2
QB HURRIES
2
LT
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
UNT
0.193
SEASON 0.156
EPA / PLAY
0.204
SEASON 0.327
46.3%
SEASON 40.3%
SUCCESS RATE
40.0%
SEASON 47.5%
10.0%
SEASON 11.4%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
12.9%
SEASON 16.3%
4.26
SEASON 4.73
YARDS / PLAY
5.51
SEASON 7.01
0.204
SEASON 0.278
EPA ALLOWED
0.193
SEASON 0.321
40.0%
SEASON 45.8%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
46.3%
SEASON 47.6%
12.9%
SEASON 14.4%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
10.0%
SEASON 17.3%
27.0%
SEASON 19.0%
STUFF RATE
18.8%
SEASON 15.5%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2020 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 14 FIELD n=45
MARKET
TOTAL65.5
SPREADLT -1.0
IMPLIED — LT33.3
IMPLIED — UNT32.3
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
67FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
5 / 45
BY ENVIRONMENT
6 / 45
DISAGREEMENT1 SLOTThe two rankings disagree by 1 position on a 45-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
MIDDLING × FAST
LT PACE26.2s
58
UNT PACE24.1s
93
SHARED PACE25.2s
75
PLAY VOLUME143
75
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
LT40CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
22
TEMPO
58
EXPLOSIVE22p
22
TEMPO58p
58
UNT87CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
81
TEMPO
93
EXPLOSIVE81p
81
TEMPO93p
93
IS THE RECORD REAL2020 · FULL SEASON
LTRECORD OVERSTATES
5-4ACTUALvs3.7-5.3FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+1.3 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-1
POINT MARGIN / GAME-5.0
LOUISIANA TECH won 5 of 9 against a scoring profile describing 3.7. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
UNTRECORD MATCHES
4-5ACTUALvs3.6-5.4FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.4 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-0
POINT MARGIN / GAME-6.2
NORTH TEXAS won 4 of 9 against a scoring profile describing 3.6. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERLOUISIANA TECHNORTH TEXAS2020 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%J'Mar SmithQB · SHARE NOT MEASURED
RB0%Bobby HollyFB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
WR/TE0%Javonte WoodardWR · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%Courtney WallaceDT · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%Collin ScottLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB0%Aaron RobersonCB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION6 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
RBHarlan Dixon · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
WR/TENO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLDontrell Cobbs · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
LBJoe Mason · SIGNEE ★3Tyler Grubbs · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DBCedric Woods · SIGNEE ★3Jamison Kelly · SIGNEE ★3Damon McFarland · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · LOUISIANA TECH
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———207CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———7612CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————17CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————20CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————19CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————10CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————21CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE42nd42
BLUE-CHIP RATIO3%38
RECRUITING CLASS#75 · 0/18 BC44
CLASS RANK TREND+2 · 3 CYCLES54
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 5th YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX41%77
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
UNTSETH LITTRELL5TH SEASON1 SEASON · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
2121
PACE
6969
PASS RATE
1414
EXPLOSIVENESS
100100
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
4141
HAVOC
11
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
LTSKIP HOLTZ5TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESLT OFFENSEUNT OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBLOUISIANA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
20
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSENORTH TEXAS DEFENSE
LT QUARTERBACKSn=780% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
LUKE ANTHONYQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★2—
WESTIN ELLIOTTQBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
AARON ALLENQBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
TRENT WESSELQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
JD HEADQBTRUE FR
—2ND YR——★3—
SHOW ALL 7
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
UNT DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 49 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLLOUISIANA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7NORTH TEXAS DEFENSE
LT OFFENSIVE LINEn=20RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
ABRAHAM DELFINOLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
JOSHUA MOTEOLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
DONAVAUGHN CAMPBELLOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
WALKER HANKINSONOLRET
—1ST YR——★2—
KODY RUSSEYOLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
UNT FRONT-7n=28 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JIMMY WALKERDLRET
—1ST YR——★3—
KORTLIN RAUSAWDLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
DION NOVILDLRET
—4TH YR——★2—
CALEB COLVINDLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
JUSTIN BOOKER-BROWNDLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBLOUISIANA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
76
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7NORTH TEXAS DEFENSE
LT RUNNING BACKSn=1224% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
ISRAEL TUCKERRBRET
—4TH YR——★2—
CHARVIS THORNTONRBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
GREG GARNERRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
JUSTIN HENDERSONRBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
CAM WRIGHTRBTRUE FR
—1ST YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
UNT FRONT-72 ROOMS · 28 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TELOUISIANA TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYNORTH TEXAS DEFENSE
LT PASS CATCHERSn=17RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
ADRIAN HARDYWRRET
—4TH YR——★3—
CEE JAY POWELLWRRET
—4TH YR——★2—
GEORGE SCOTTWRRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
GRIFFIN HEBERTTERET
—4TH YR——★2—
TAHJ MAGEEWRRET
—3RD YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
UNT SECONDARYn=21 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JORDAN NICHOLSSTRUE FR
—2ND YR——★3—
UPTON STOUTDBTRUE FR
—3RD YR——★4—
MAKYLE SANDERSSRET
—4TH YR——★2—
CAM JOHNSONDBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
KEELAN CROSBYDBRET
—3RD YR——★2—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
LT
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
UNT
SP+ OVERALL
-7.0
-8.0
FPI
-11.5
-18.1
ELO
1256
1193
TALENT
467
416
PRODUCTION
25
22
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+14
+11
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.03
0.00
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
LT
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
UNT
PASS RATE
53.8%
45.5%
PACE
26.2s
24.1s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
23%
30%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
51.6%
61.3%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
66.0%
62.0%
PLAYS / GAME
68.8
74.6
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
2.3%
0.3%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = LT, ORANGE = UNT) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2020, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE