SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2020 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2020›WEEK 16›TA&M @ TENN›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
MISS @ LSU77
ORE @ USC75
NU @ OSU71
MINN @ WIS70
AF @ ARMY69
OU @ ISU67
WSU @ UTAH67
BOIS @ SJSU67
ILL @ PSU66
UAB @ MRSH65
CLEM @ ND65
TA&M @ TENN60
MIZ @ MSST60
ALA @ FLA58
TLSA @ CIN58
NEB @ RUTG57
BALL @ BUF48
ASU @ ORST48
STAN @ UCLA38
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
TEXAS A&M
TENNESSEE
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2020
SAT 12:00 ET|NEYLAND STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP5|O/U49.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#4AP
8FPI
TA&MSECTEXAS A&M
34
8-1
96
84
91
80%
82
—
31.5
—
-13.5
HOME
—AP
53FPI
TENNSECTENNESSEE
13
3-7
91
59
74
54%
25
—
18.0
—
+13.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2020CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALTA&M34—TENN13
CLOSED TA&M -13.5TOTAL 49.5TA&M COVERED · 47 POINTS · UNDER
TA&M
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
TENN
34
POINTS
13
497
TOTAL YARDS
213
281 (26-32)
PASSING
189 (12-20)
216 (47)
RUSHING
24 (17)
28
FIRST DOWNS
13
10-14
THIRD DOWN
1-6
0-0
FOURTH DOWN
1-1
44:12
TIME OF POSS.
15:48
4-30
PENALTIES
6-55
1
TURNOVERS
2
3
SACKS
0
0
QB HURRIES
0
TA&M
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
TENN
0.377
SEASON 0.326
EPA / PLAY
0.242
SEASON 0.210
63.6%
SEASON 51.6%
SUCCESS RATE
38.2%
SEASON 44.4%
13.0%
SEASON 17.9%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
23.5%
SEASON 15.9%
6.45
SEASON 6.55
YARDS / PLAY
6.53
SEASON 5.55
0.242
SEASON 0.194
EPA ALLOWED
0.377
SEASON 0.245
38.2%
SEASON 40.9%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
63.6%
SEASON 48.4%
23.5%
SEASON 15.3%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
13.0%
SEASON 16.3%
15.4%
SEASON 20.3%
STUFF RATE
21.7%
SEASON 20.7%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2020 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 16 FIELD n=19
MARKET
TOTAL49.5
SPREADTA&M -13.5
IMPLIED — TA&M31.5
IMPLIED — TENN18.0
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
41FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
14 / 19
BY ENVIRONMENT
15 / 19
DISAGREEMENT1 SLOTThe two rankings disagree by 1 position on a 19-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × SLOW
TA&M PACE25.0s
82
TENN PACE27.8s
25
SHARED PACE26.4s
54
PLAY VOLUME137
54
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
TA&M52CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
23
TEMPO
82
EXPLOSIVE23p
23
TEMPO82p
82
TENN22CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
19
TEMPO
25
EXPLOSIVE19p
19
TEMPO25p
25
IS THE RECORD REAL2020 · FULL SEASON
TA&MRECORD OVERSTATES
8-1ACTUALvs6.5-2.5FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+1.5 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-0
POINT MARGIN / GAME+10.6
TEXAS A&M won 8 of 9 against a scoring profile describing 6.5. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TENNRECORD MATCHES
3-7ACTUALvs3.1-6.9FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.1 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-0
POINT MARGIN / GAME-8.6
TENNESSEE won 3 of 10 against a scoring profile describing 3.1. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERTEXAS A&MTENNESSEE2020 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%Jacob KibodiRB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
WR/TE0%Kendrick RogersWR · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%Mitchell HowardDL · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
LB0%Brian JohnsonPORTAL · TULSA · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB0%Larry PryorDB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION5 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBDarvon Hubbard · SIGNEE ★3Deondre Jackson · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
WR/TEDemond Demas · SIGNEE ★5Moose Muhammad III · SIGNEE ★4Devin Price · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLMcKinnley Jackson · SIGNEE ★4Isaiah Raikes · SIGNEE ★4Dallas Walker IV · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
LBAntonio Doyle Jr. · SIGNEE ★4Edgerrin Cooper · SIGNEE ★4Kenneth Phillips III · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DBJaylon Jones · SIGNEE ★5Antonio Johnson · SIGNEE ★4Josh Moten · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · TEXAS A&M
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———937CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———6612CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————29CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————21CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————22CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————14CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————26CARRIED FROM 2019 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE96th96
BLUE-CHIP RATIO53%92
RECRUITING CLASS#6 · 15/25 BC96
CLASS RANK TREND+11 · 3 CYCLES72
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 3rd YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX38%67
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
TENNJEREMY PRUITT3TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
TA&MJIMBO FISHER3TH SEASON2 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
7878
PACE
5050
PASS RATE
7474
EXPLOSIVENESS
5252
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
1111
HAVOC
9494
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESTA&M OFFENSETENN OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBTEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
93
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSETENNESSEE DEFENSE
TA&M QUARTERBACKSn=77% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
HAYNES KINGQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
KELLEN MONDQBRET
—4TH YR——★4—
COLTON TAYLORQBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
JAMES FOSTERQBRET
—3RD YR——★4—
REINARD BRITZQBRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 7
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TENN DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 65 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——27%
LINEBACKERSLB
——29%
SECONDARYDB
——23%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLTEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TENNESSEE DEFENSE
TA&M OFFENSIVE LINEn=21RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CARSON GREENOLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
RILEY ANDERSONOLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
RYAN MCCOLLUMOLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
DAN MOORE JR.OLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
GRAYSON REEDOLRET
—3RD YR——★4—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TENN FRONT-7n=39 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
LATRELL BUMPHUSDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
MATTHEW BUTLERDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
TYLER BARONDLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
BRYSON EASONDLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
DAREL MIDDLETONDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBTEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
66
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TENNESSEE DEFENSE
TA&M RUNNING BACKSn=1234% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DEVON ACHANERBTRUE FR
—3RD YR——★4—
DARVON HUBBARDRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
EARNEST CROWNOVERRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
DEONDRE JACKSONRBTRUE FR
—2ND YR——★4—
ISAIAH SPILLERRBRET
—2ND YR——★4—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TENN FRONT-72 ROOMS · 39 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——27%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——29%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TETEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYTENNESSEE DEFENSE
TA&M PASS CATCHERSn=29RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
AINIAS SMITHWRRET
—4TH YR——★3—
JALEN WYDERMYERTERET
—2ND YR——★4—
REESE MASONWRRET
—3RD YR——★2—
RYAN RENICKTERET
—4TH YR——UNR—
JALEN PRESTONWRRET
—4TH YR——★4—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TENN SECONDARYn=26 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
ALONTAE TAYLORDBRET
—3RD YR——★4—
TREVON FLOWERSDBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
CHEYENNE LABRUZZADBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
ROMELLO EDWARDSDBRET
—4TH YR——★2—
WARREN BURRELLDBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
TA&M
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TENN
SP+ OVERALL
16.2
0.9
FPI
18.2
3.0
ELO
1867
1484
TALENT
875
844
PRODUCTION
90
50
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+6
+41
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.53
0.39
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
TA&M
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TENN
PASS RATE
46.1%
47.1%
PACE
25.0s
27.8s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
15%
28%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
64.0%
61.0%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
70.7%
66.3%
PLAYS / GAME
72.1
64.7
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
0.9%
1.1%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = TA&M, ORANGE = TENN) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2020, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE