SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2021 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2021›WEEK 6›MSU @ RUTG›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
PSU @ IOWA81
TCU @ TTU80
UVA @ LOU79
OU @ TEX76
ND @ VT72
MSU @ RUTG71
WVU @ BAY70
FAU @ UAB68
MICH @ NEB68
UTAH @ USC68
WIS @ ILL67
UTSA @ WKU66
VAN @ FLA64
UGA @ AUB64
TEM @ CIN63
WAKE @ SYR63
UTEP @ USM63
HOU @ TULN62
ARK @ MISS62
LSU @ UK62
STAN @ ASU61
ORST @ WSU61
MD @ OSU60
MEM @ TLSA60
BOIS @ BYU59
ALA @ TA&M58
SC @ TENN57
SJSU @ CSU56
CLT @ FIU55
M-OH @ EMU55
MTSU @ LIB55
UNM @ SDSU54
CCU @ ARST53
FSU @ UNC53
WYO @ AF53
USA @ TXST52
BUF @ KENT52
SMU @ NAVY50
GT @ DUKE49
CMU @ OHIO49
BALL @ WMU49
ODU @ MRSH48
ECU @ UCF48
GASO @ TROY47
NIU @ TOL46
UCLA @ ARIZ45
GAST @ ULM39
UNT @ MIZ35
CONN @ MASS34
NMSU @ NEV33
AKR @ BGSU30
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
MICHIGAN STATE
RUTGERS
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2021
SAT 12:00 ET|SHI STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP20|O/U49.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#9AP
19FPI
MSUB1GMICHIGAN STATE
31
10-2
74
90
65
57%
25
93
26.8
—
-4.0
HOME
—AP
86FPI
RUTGB1GRUTGERS
13
5-7
54
12
71
93%
59
55
22.8
—
+4.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2021CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALMSU31—RUTG13
CLOSED MSU -4.0TOTAL 49.5MSU COVERED · 44 POINTS · UNDER
MSU
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
RUTG
31
POINTS
13
588
TOTAL YARDS
377
339 (16-27)
PASSING
266 (22-41)
249 (38)
RUSHING
111 (36)
20
FIRST DOWNS
19
4-13
THIRD DOWN
5-17
0-1
FOURTH DOWN
0-2
29:03
TIME OF POSS.
30:57
9-68
PENALTIES
7-65
3
TURNOVERS
1
4
SACKS
0
3
QB HURRIES
1
MSU
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
RUTG
0.415
SEASON 0.311
EPA / PLAY
0.033
SEASON 0.098
38.1%
SEASON 44.5%
SUCCESS RATE
34.2%
SEASON 40.0%
22.2%
SEASON 18.4%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
10.5%
SEASON 10.2%
9.51
SEASON 6.87
YARDS / PLAY
5.05
SEASON 4.80
0.033
SEASON 0.237
EPA ALLOWED
0.415
SEASON 0.236
34.2%
SEASON 45.5%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
38.1%
SEASON 39.1%
10.5%
SEASON 13.7%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
22.2%
SEASON 16.9%
12.9%
SEASON 15.0%
STUFF RATE
24.3%
SEASON 16.6%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2021 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 6 FIELD n=51
MARKET
TOTAL49.5
SPREADMSU -4.0
IMPLIED — MSU26.8
IMPLIED — RUTG22.8
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
45FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
39 / 51
BY ENVIRONMENT
37 / 51
DISAGREEMENT2 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 2 positions on a 51-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
SLOW × MIDDLING
MSU PACE28.4s
25
RUTG PACE26.4s
59
SHARED PACE27.4s
42
PLAY VOLUME132
42
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
MSU58CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
91
TEMPO
25
EXPLOSIVE91p
91
TEMPO25p
25
RUTG30CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
1
TEMPO
59
EXPLOSIVE1p
1
TEMPO59p
59
IS THE RECORD REAL2021 · FULL SEASON
MSURECORD OVERSTATES
10-2ACTUALvs7.5-4.5FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+2.5 W
ONE SCORE RECORD4-0
POINT MARGIN / GAME+6.3
MICHIGAN STATE won 10 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 7.5. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
RUTGRECORD MATCHES
5-7ACTUALvs4.7-7.3FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.3 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-1
POINT MARGIN / GAME-4.1
RUTGERS won 5 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 4.7. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERMICHIGAN STATERUTGERS2021 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Rocky LombardiPORTAL · NORTHERN ILLINOIS · SHARE NOT MEASURED
RB0%Anthony Williams Jr.PORTAL · AKRON · SHARE NOT MEASURED
WR/TE0%Matt DotsonTE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%Naquan JonesDT · SHARE NOT MEASURED
LB0%Antjuan SimmonsLB · SHARE NOT MEASURED
DB0%Julian BarnettPORTAL · MEMPHIS · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION6 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBAnthony Russo · PORTAL ★3 · TEMPLEHampton Fay · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
RBKenneth Walker · PORTAL ★3 · WAKE FORESTHarold Joiner · PORTAL ★3 · AUBURNDavion Primm · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
WR/TEKeon Coleman · SIGNEE ★4Kameron Allen · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLTyson Watson · SIGNEE ★3Derrick Harmon · SIGNEE ★3Alex Okelo · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
LBQuavaris Crouch · PORTAL ★3 · TENNESSEEItayvion Brown · PORTAL ★3 · MINNESOTAMa'a Gaoteote · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
DBChester Kimbrough · PORTAL ★3 · FLORIDACharles Brantley · SIGNEE ★3A.J. Kirk · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · MICHIGAN STATE
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———354CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———987CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————25CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————19CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————17CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————16CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————21CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE74th74
BLUE-CHIP RATIO16%71
RECRUITING CLASS#43 · 2/18 BC68
CLASS RANK TREND-11 · 3 CYCLES28
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 2nd YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX26%35
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
RUTGGREG SCHIANO2TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
2020
PACE
4646
PASS RATE
1818
EXPLOSIVENESS
1010
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
6161
HAVOC
2626
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
MSUMEL TUCKER2TH SEASON1 SEASON · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
7878
PACE
5252
PASS RATE
8080
EXPLOSIVENESS
5454
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
9393
HAVOC
2323
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESMSU OFFENSERUTG OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBMICHIGAN STATE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
35
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSERUTGERS DEFENSE
MSU QUARTERBACKSn=465% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
ANTHONY RUSSOQBPORTAL · TEMPLE
—4TH YR——★3—
PAYTON THORNEQBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
NOAH KIMQBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
ANDREW SCHORFHAARQBRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RUTG DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 63 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
——17%
SECONDARYDB
——9%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLMICHIGAN STATE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7RUTGERS DEFENSE
MSU OFFENSIVE LINEn=19RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MATT ALLENOLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
AJ ARCURIOTRET
—4TH YR——★3—
LUKE CAMPBELLOLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
BLAKE BUETEROLRET
—4TH YR——★2—
MATT CARRICKGRET
————★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RUTG FRONT-7n=41 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
RENE KONGADLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
WESLEY BAILEYDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
CJ ONYECHIDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
JAMREE KROMAHDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
KYONTE HAMILTONDLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBMICHIGAN STATE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
98
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7RUTGERS DEFENSE
MSU RUNNING BACKSn=72% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CONNOR HEYWARDRBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
JORDON SIMMONSRBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
KENNETH WALKER IIIRBTRUE FR
—3RD YR——★3—
DONOVAN EAGLINRBRET
—2ND YR——★3—
ELIJAH COLLINSRBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW ALL 7
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RUTG FRONT-72 ROOMS · 41 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——17%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEMICHIGAN STATE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYRUTGERS DEFENSE
MSU PASS CATCHERSn=25RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TRENTON GILLISONTERET
—3RD YR——★4—
TRE MOSLEYWRRET
—4TH YR——★3—
MALIQ CARRTEPORTAL · PURDUE
—4TH YR——★3—
CHRISTIAN FITZPATRICKWRPORTAL · LOUISVILLE
—4TH YR——★3—
IAN STEWARTWRRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RUTG SECONDARYn=22 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JOE LUSARDIDBRET
—4TH YR——★2—
NAIJEE JONESDBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
ELIJUWAN MACKDBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
PATRICE RENEDBPORTAL · NORTH CAROLINA
—4TH YR——★3—
SHAQUAN LOYALDBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
MSU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
RUTG
SP+ OVERALL
11.2
-3.0
FPI
10.8
-4.2
ELO
1595
1298
TALENT
677
573
PRODUCTION
79
33
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−6
+18
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.16
0.08
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
MSU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
RUTG
PASS RATE
46.6%
45.1%
PACE
28.4s
26.4s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
18%
28%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
61.0%
63.3%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
64.6%
64.1%
PLAYS / GAME
63.5
68.2
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
0.4%
2.4%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = MSU, ORANGE = RUTG) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2021, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE