SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2021 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2021›WEEK 9›CIN @ TULN›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
IOWA @ WIS80
UVA @ BYU80
FRES @ SDSU74
TEX @ BAY73
RUTG @ ILL72
UK @ MSST71
FSU @ CLEM70
TCU @ KSU70
UCLA @ UTAH70
MICH @ MSU68
IU @ MD66
PUR @ NEB65
TTU @ OU65
MISS @ AUB65
ISU @ WVU64
SMU @ HOU64
CIN @ TULN63
MINN @ NU63
UNC @ ND63
UGA @ FLA61
BC @ SYR61
LOU @ NCSU61
ORST @ CAL59
NAVY @ TLSA58
MIA @ PITT58
KU @ OKST58
UCF @ TEM57
ULM @ APP57
DUKE @ WAKE57
CLT @ WKU56
MASS @ LIB55
VT @ GT54
UNT @ RICE53
WSU @ ASU53
TROY @ CCU52
TXST @ UL52
LT @ ODU52
WYO @ SJSU52
WASH @ STAN51
USF @ ECU50
UTEP @ FAU49
PSU @ OSU49
USM @ MTSU48
GAST @ GASO48
HAW @ USU47
COLO @ ORE46
BOIS @ CSU46
ARST @ USA45
MIZ @ VAN40
FIU @ MRSH40
BGSU @ BUF34
ARIZ @ USC32
UNLV @ NEV30
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
CINCINNATI
TULANE
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2021
SAT 12:00 ET|YULMAN STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP26|O/U61.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#4AP
10FPI
CINB12CINCINNATI
31
13-0
63
85
95
86%
10
50
44.8
—
-28.0
HOME
—AP
90FPI
TULNAACTULANE
12
2-10
37
63
40
88%
19
36
16.8
—
+28.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2021CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALCIN31—TULN12
CLOSED CIN -28.0TOTAL 61.5TULN COVERED · 43 POINTS · UNDER
CIN
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
TULN
31
POINTS
12
351
TOTAL YARDS
280
227 (17-27)
PASSING
93 (9-18)
124 (37)
RUSHING
187 (45)
18
FIRST DOWNS
17
4-12
THIRD DOWN
4-12
2-2
FOURTH DOWN
2-4
28:12
TIME OF POSS.
31:48
3-20
PENALTIES
9-67
1
TURNOVERS
4
4
SACKS
3
0
QB HURRIES
0
CIN
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
TULN
0.265
SEASON 0.379
EPA / PLAY
0.209
SEASON 0.237
47.5%
SEASON 49.8%
SUCCESS RATE
40.7%
SEASON 40.0%
14.8%
SEASON 19.5%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
14.8%
SEASON 16.3%
5.74
SEASON 7.10
YARDS / PLAY
5.22
SEASON 6.07
0.209
SEASON 0.070
EPA ALLOWED
0.265
SEASON 0.255
40.7%
SEASON 37.3%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
47.5%
SEASON 43.5%
14.8%
SEASON 11.7%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
14.8%
SEASON 15.7%
11.4%
SEASON 19.3%
STUFF RATE
21.2%
SEASON 21.6%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2021 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 9 FIELD n=53
MARKET
TOTAL61.5
SPREADCIN -28.0
IMPLIED — CIN44.8
IMPLIED — TULN16.8
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
46FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
11 / 53
BY ENVIRONMENT
36 / 53
DISAGREEMENT25 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 25 positions on a 53-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
SLOW × SLOW
CIN PACE29.7s
10
TULN PACE28.7s
19
SHARED PACE29.2s
15
PLAY VOLUME124
15
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
CIN26CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
42
TEMPO
10
EXPLOSIVE42p
42
TEMPO10p
10
TULN59CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
98
TEMPO
19
EXPLOSIVE98p
98
TEMPO19p
19
IS THE RECORD REAL2021 · FULL SEASON
CINRECORD OVERSTATES
13-0ACTUALvs11.6-1.4FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+1.4 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-0
POINT MARGIN / GAME+23.2
CINCINNATI won 13 of 13 against a scoring profile describing 11.6. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TULNRECORD UNDERSTATES
2-10ACTUALvs4.5-7.5FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-2.5 W
ONE SCORE RECORD0-5
POINT MARGIN / GAME-6.4
TULANE won 2 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 4.5. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERCINCINNATITULANE2021 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Ben BryantPORTAL · EASTERN MICHIGAN · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
RB0%Gerrid DoaksDRAFTED · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
WR/TE0%Jayshon JacksonPORTAL · BALL STATE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
OL0%Darius HarperOL · SHARE NOT MEASURED
DL0%Ethan TuckyDT · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%Jarell WhiteLB · SHARE NOT MEASURED
DB0%James WigginsDRAFTED · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBBrady Lichtenberg · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
RBMyles Montgomery · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
WR/TEWill Pauling · SIGNEE ★3Drew Donley · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLLuke Collinsworth · SIGNEE ★3Mao Glynn II · SIGNEE ★3Landon Fickell · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DLJowon Briggs · PORTAL ★3 · VIRGINIAZeiqui Lawton · SIGNEE ★3Rob Jackson · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
LBJack Dingle · SIGNEE ★3Cameron Junior · SIGNEE ★3Caleb Schmitz · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DBArmorion Smith · SIGNEE ★3Iesa Jarmon · SIGNEE ★3Leroy Bowers · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · CINCINNATI
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———953CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———428CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————30CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————23CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————23CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————18CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————21CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE63rd63
BLUE-CHIP RATIO10%63
RECRUITING CLASS#42 · 1/24 BC69
CLASS RANK TREND+37 · 3 CYCLES100
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 5th YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX22%16
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
TULNWILLIE FRITZ6TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 2 PROGRAMMES
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
1818
PACE
3636
PASS RATE
1313
EXPLOSIVENESS
2626
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
7676
HAVOC
5555
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
CINLUKE FICKELL5TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 2 PROGRAMMES
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
5252
PACE
2424
PASS RATE
5353
EXPLOSIVENESS
1515
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
2525
HAVOC
3434
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESCIN OFFENSETULN OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBCINCINNATI OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
95
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSETULANE DEFENSE
CIN QUARTERBACKSn=35% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DESMOND RIDDERQBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
BRADY LICHTENBERGQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
JACK PERRYQBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TULN DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 60 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——5%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLCINCINNATI OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TULANE DEFENSE
CIN OFFENSIVE LINEn=23RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JOHN WILLIAMSOLRET
—2ND YR——★3—
JOE HUBEROLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
CODY LAMBOLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
VINCENT MCCONNELLOLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
LORENZ METZOLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TULN FRONT-7n=33 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DEVEAN DEALEDGETRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
ADONIS FRILOUXDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
ALFRED THOMASDERET
—4TH YR——★3—
NOAH SEIDENDERET
—2ND YR——UNR—
DARIUS HODGESDLRET
—3RD YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBCINCINNATI OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
42
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TULANE DEFENSE
CIN RUNNING BACKSn=858% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CHARLES MCCLELLANDRBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
RYAN MONTGOMERYRBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
JEROME FORDRBRET
—3RD YR——★4—
ETHAN WRIGHTRBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
LEWIS SHEPHERDRBTRUE FR
—3RD YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 8
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TULN FRONT-72 ROOMS · 33 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——5%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TECINCINNATI OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYTULANE DEFENSE
CIN PASS CATCHERSn=30RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
WILL PAULINGWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
NOAH DAVISTERET
—4TH YR——★3—
TYLER SCOTTWRRET
—3RD YR——★3—
PAYTEN SINGLETARYTERET
—4TH YR——★3—
NATE MEYERWRRET
—2ND YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TULN SECONDARYn=27 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JADON CANADYDBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
LARRY BROOKSSRET
—4TH YR——★3—
KILAND HARRISONDBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
SHI'KEEM LAISTERSRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
RISHI RATTANDBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
CIN
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TULN
SP+ OVERALL
21.2
-3.9
FPI
15.3
-5.5
ELO
1952
1416
TALENT
627
463
PRODUCTION
97
32
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−37
+1
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.10
0.03
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
CIN
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TULN
PASS RATE
47.5%
50.2%
PACE
29.7s
28.7s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
21%
38%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
58.5%
52.4%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
65.0%
54.7%
PLAYS / GAME
60.7
62.8
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.8%
0.7%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = CIN, ORANGE = TULN) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2021, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE