SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2021 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2021›WEEK 10›UTAH @ STAN›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
WAKE @ UNC81
OKST @ WVU81
AUB @ TA&M76
SMU @ MEM75
BAY @ TCU74
NCSU @ FSU74
ARMY @ AF71
TENN @ UK71
MIZ @ UGA70
NIU @ KENT69
WIS @ RUTG68
MSU @ PUR67
OSU @ NEB66
CLEM @ LOU66
TEX @ ISU66
IU @ MICH66
VT @ BC65
UTAH @ STAN64
LIB @ MISS64
MSST @ ARK64
LT @ UAB63
GT @ MIA63
IOWA @ NU62
HOU @ USF62
PITT @ DUKE61
FLA @ SC61
USC @ ASU60
TLSA @ CIN59
LSU @ ALA59
SDSU @ HAW59
KSU @ KU58
NAVY @ ND58
ODU @ FIU58
BOIS @ FRES57
APP @ ARST56
UNT @ USM55
MRSH @ FAU54
PSU @ MD53
EMU @ TOL52
CMU @ WMU52
ILL @ MINN52
CAL @ ARIZ52
ORE @ WASH52
M-OH @ OHIO51
ORST @ COLO51
UNLV @ UNM50
USA @ TROY49
CCU @ GASO49
TULN @ UCF48
RICE @ CLT47
TEM @ ECU46
GAST @ UL43
UTSA @ UTEP43
MTSU @ WKU41
CSU @ WYO41
ULM @ TXST38
SJSU @ NEV37
USU @ NMSU36
BALL @ AKR27
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
UTAH
STANFORD
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2021
FRI 22:30 ET|STANFORD STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP5|O/U51.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#12AP
11FPI
UTAHB12UTAH
52
10-3
78
71
68
37%
33
40
31.3
—
-11.0
HOME
—AP
91FPI
STANACCSTANFORD
7
3-9
83
34
12
40%
2
78
20.3
—
+11.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2021CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALUTAH52—STAN7
CLOSED UTAH -11.0TOTAL 51.5UTAH COVERED · 59 POINTS · OVER
UTAH
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
STAN
52
POINTS
7
581
TOTAL YARDS
167
140 (13-22)
PASSING
85 (15-23)
441 (46)
RUSHING
82 (32)
31
FIRST DOWNS
11
7-11
THIRD DOWN
3-13
1-2
FOURTH DOWN
1-1
30:22
TIME OF POSS.
29:38
2-10
PENALTIES
2-18
1
TURNOVERS
2
5
SACKS
0
3
QB HURRIES
2
UTAH
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
STAN
0.522
SEASON 0.326
EPA / PLAY
0.144
SEASON 0.187
59.7%
SEASON 48.9%
SUCCESS RATE
29.2%
SEASON 39.9%
32.8%
SEASON 19.4%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
8.3%
SEASON 13.9%
9.09
SEASON 6.66
YARDS / PLAY
5.46
SEASON 5.94
0.144
SEASON 0.175
EPA ALLOWED
0.522
SEASON 0.331
29.2%
SEASON 39.7%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
59.7%
SEASON 50.2%
8.3%
SEASON 13.4%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
32.8%
SEASON 17.7%
13.0%
SEASON 19.2%
STUFF RATE
11.1%
SEASON 13.8%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2021 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 10 FIELD n=59
MARKET
TOTAL51.5
SPREADUTAH -11.0
IMPLIED — UTAH31.3
IMPLIED — STAN20.3
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
45FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
40 / 59
BY ENVIRONMENT
34 / 59
DISAGREEMENT6 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 6 positions on a 59-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
SLOW × SLOW
UTAH PACE27.9s
33
STAN PACE31.6s
2
SHARED PACE29.8s
18
PLAY VOLUME121
18
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
UTAH42CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
50
TEMPO
33
EXPLOSIVE50p
50
TEMPO33p
33
STAN38CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
73
TEMPO
2
EXPLOSIVE73p
73
TEMPO2p
2
IS THE RECORD REAL2021 · FULL SEASON
UTAHRECORD MATCHES
10-3ACTUALvs10.2-2.8FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.2 W
ONE SCORE RECORD0-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+14.8
UTAH won 10 of 13 against a scoring profile describing 10.2. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
STANRECORD MATCHES
3-9ACTUALvs3.0-9.0FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.0 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME-12.0
STANFORD won 3 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 3.0. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERUTAHSTANFORD2021 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Jake BentleyPORTAL · SOUTH ALABAMA · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
RB0%Jordan WilmorePORTAL · FRESNO STATE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
WR/TE0%Bryan ThompsonPORTAL · ARIZONA STATE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%Maxs TupaiDE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
LB0%Moroni AnaeLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
DB0%Nate RitchieS · SHARE NOT MEASURED
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBPeter Costelli · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
RBT.J. Pledger · PORTAL ★3 · OKLAHOMARicky Parks · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
WR/TETheo Howard · PORTAL ★3 · OKLAHOMAMunir McClain · PORTAL ★3 · USCIsaac Vaha · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLMichael Mokofisi · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
LBJosh Calvert · PORTAL ★4 · WASHINGTONEthan Calvert · SIGNEE ★4Mason Tufaga · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
DBBrandon McKinney · PORTAL ★4 · WASHINGTONElisha Lloyd · SIGNEE ★3Darrien Stewart · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · UTAH
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———44CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———1111CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————28CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————20CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————19CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————18CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————20CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE78th78
BLUE-CHIP RATIO20%73
RECRUITING CLASS#33 · 4/18 BC76
CLASS RANK TREND+9 · 3 CYCLES68
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 6th YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX30%47
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
STANDAVID SHAW6TH SEASON1 SEASON · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
9292
PACE
7373
PASS RATE
9797
EXPLOSIVENESS
99
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
2626
HAVOC
2626
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
UTAHKYLE WHITTINGHAM6TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
2828
PACE
6060
PASS RATE
1717
EXPLOSIVENESS
2525
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
7171
HAVOC
9090
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESUTAH OFFENSESTAN OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBUTAH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
4
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSESTANFORD DEFENSE
UTAH QUARTERBACKSn=496% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CHARLIE BREWERQBPORTAL · BAYLOR
—4TH YR——★3—
CAMERON RISINGQBRET
—4TH YR——★4—
BRYSON BARNESQBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
PETER COSTELLIQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
STAN DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 48 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——39%
LINEBACKERSLB
——14%
SECONDARYDB
——13%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLUTAH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7STANFORD DEFENSE
UTAH OFFENSIVE LINEn=20RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
NICK FORDOLRET
—3RD YR——★3—
BRAEDEN DANIELSOLRET
—3RD YR——★3—
SHINTARO MANNOLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
PAUL MAILEOLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SIMI MOALAOLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
STAN FRONT-7n=32 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
ANTHONY FRANKLINDETRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
TOBIN PHILLIPSDLRET
—4TH YR——★4—
RYAN JOHNSONDLRET
—4TH YR——★4—
DALYN WADE-PERRYDTRET
—4TH YR——★4—
GABE REIDDERET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBUTAH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
11
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7STANFORD DEFENSE
UTAH RUNNING BACKSn=1189% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CHRIS CURRYRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
JA'QUINDEN JACKSONRBPORTAL · TEXAS
—4TH YR——★4—
T.J. PLEDGERRBPORTAL · OKLAHOMA
—3RD YR——★3—
TAVION THOMASRBTRUE FR
—3RD YR——★4—
FAYSAL ADENRBRET
—2ND YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
STAN FRONT-72 ROOMS · 32 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——39%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——14%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TEUTAH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYSTANFORD DEFENSE
UTAH PASS CATCHERSn=28RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MONEY PARKSWRRET
—4TH YR——★3—
MIKI SUGUTURAGATERET
—4TH YR——★3—
BRANT KUITHETERET
—4TH YR——★3—
JAYLEN DIXONWRPORTAL · UTAH
—4TH YR——★3—
THEO HOWARDWRPORTAL · OKLAHOMA
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
STAN SECONDARYn=16 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JIMMY WYRICKSTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
NOAH WILLIAMSSRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
DONJAE LOGANDBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
KENDALL WILLIAMSONSRET
————★3—
ETHAN BONNERCBRET
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
UTAH
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
STAN
SP+ OVERALL
15.2
-10.2
FPI
14.5
-5.6
ELO
1935
1283
TALENT
708
745
PRODUCTION
88
19
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−11
+63
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.20
0.29
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
UTAH
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
STAN
PASS RATE
44.7%
58.1%
PACE
27.9s
31.6s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
28%
17%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
59.6%
50.1%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
55.4%
75.0%
PLAYS / GAME
64.5
56.9
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
0.8%
1.9%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = UTAH, ORANGE = STAN) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2021, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE