SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2025 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2025›WEEK 9›TA&M @ LSU›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
RUTG @ PUR77
TOL @ WSU77
TA&M @ LSU77
SDSU @ FRES75
BAY @ CIN73
SMU @ WAKE72
USF @ MEM72
MIZ @ VAN72
HOU @ ASU71
BYU @ ISU70
AUB @ ARK69
MISS @ OU68
ILL @ WASH68
UCLA @ IU67
KSU @ KU67
TENN @ UK66
MINN @ IOWA65
WIS @ ORE64
ALA @ SC62
STAN @ MIA62
NCSU @ PITT60
OKST @ TTU59
NU @ NEB58
FAU @ NAVY58
APP @ ODU56
TCU @ WVU56
BC @ LOU56
CSU @ WYO55
WMU @ M-OH54
MICH @ MSU54
UVA @ UNC53
COLO @ UTAH53
CAL @ VT52
TEX @ MSST52
OHIO @ EMU49
USU @ UNM49
USA @ GAST48
SYR @ GT46
WKU @ LT45
GASO @ ARST45
UNT @ CLT44
BALL @ NIU42
TEM @ TLSA42
BOIS @ NEV41
CONN @ RICE41
MTSU @ DEL40
MOST @ NMSU40
KENN @ FIU38
UL @ TROY38
AKR @ BUF37
BGSU @ KENT34
ULM @ USM31
MASS @ CMU25
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
TEXAS A&M
LSU
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2025
SAT 19:30 ET|TIGER STADIUM (LA)CONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP1|O/U50.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#8AP
12FPI
TA&MSECTEXAS A&M
49
11-2
95
92
96
75%
73
91
26.0
-122
-1.5
HOME
—AP
26FPI
LSUSECLSU
25
7-6
96
44
93
66%
27
81
24.5
+102
+1.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2025CONSENSUS · DRAFTKINGS
FINALTA&M49—LSU25
CLOSED TA&M -1.5TOTAL 50.5TA&M COVERED · 74 POINTS · OVER
TA&M
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
LSU
49
POINTS
25
426
TOTAL YARDS
278
202 (12-21)
PASSING
218 (25-39)
224 (40)
RUSHING
60 (27)
24
FIRST DOWNS
18
7-10
THIRD DOWN
2-13
0-0
FOURTH DOWN
1-2
30:12
TIME OF POSS.
29:48
6-65
PENALTIES
4-27
2
TURNOVERS
0
7
SACKS
0
0
QB HURRIES
2
TA&M
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
LSU
0.543
SEASON 0.301
EPA / PLAY
0.115
SEASON 0.152
56.9%
SEASON 47.0%
SUCCESS RATE
34.5%
SEASON 40.1%
27.6%
SEASON 18.3%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
12.1%
SEASON 12.9%
7.71
SEASON 6.65
YARDS / PLAY
4.53
SEASON 5.42
0.115
SEASON 0.132
EPA ALLOWED
0.543
SEASON 0.145
34.5%
SEASON 33.9%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
56.9%
SEASON 38.9%
12.1%
SEASON 16.0%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
27.6%
SEASON 15.4%
20.0%
SEASON 20.8%
STUFF RATE
12.8%
SEASON 22.5%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2025 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 9 FIELD n=53
MARKET
TOTAL50.5
SPREADTA&M -1.5
IMPLIED — TA&M26.0
IMPLIED — LSU24.5
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
35FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
30 / 53
BY ENVIRONMENT
43 / 53
DISAGREEMENT13 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 13 positions on a 53-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × SLOW
TA&M PACE26.6s
73
LSU PACE28.6s
27
SHARED PACE27.6s
50
PLAY VOLUME131
50
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
TA&M54CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
48
PROE
41
TEMPO
73
EXPLOSIVE48p
48
PROE41p
41
TEMPO73p
73
LSU54CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
45
PROE
90
TEMPO
27
EXPLOSIVE45p
45
PROE90p
90
TEMPO27p
27
IS THE RECORD REAL2025 · FULL SEASON
TA&MRECORD OVERSTATES
11-1ACTUALvs9.2-2.8FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+1.8 W
ONE SCORE RECORD4-0
POINT MARGIN / GAME+14.4
TEXAS A&M won 11 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 9.2. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
LSURECORD MATCHES
7-5ACTUALvs7.2-4.8FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.2 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-3
POINT MARGIN / GAME+3.5
LSU won 7 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 7.2. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERTEXAS A&MLSU2025 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
WR/TE77%Tre WatsonTE · 21% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONNoah ThomasPORTAL · GEORGIA · 14% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONJabre BarberWR · 11% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION7 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DL55%Nic ScourtonDRAFTED · 16% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONShemar TurnerDRAFTED · 15% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONShemar StewartDRAFTED · 15% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION8 FURTHER DEPARTURES
QB31%Conner WeigmanPORTAL · HOUSTON · 31% OF ROOM PARTICIPATION
DB25%BJ MayesDB · 11% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONJaydon HillDB · 10% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB13%Solomon DeShieldsLB · 10% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL12%TJ Shanahan Jr.PORTAL · PENN STATE · 6% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONKam DewberryPORTAL · ALABAMA · 5% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
RB1%Israel BenjaminPORTAL · THE CITADEL · <1% OF ROOM PARTICIPATION
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
WR/TEKC Concepcion · PORTAL ★4 · NC STATEMario Craver · PORTAL ★4 · MISSISSIPPI STATEJerome Myles · SIGNEE ★52 MORE ARRIVALSREFILLED
DLT.J. Searcy · PORTAL ★4 · FLORIDATyler Onyedim · PORTAL ★4 · IOWA STATEDJ Sanders · SIGNEE ★43 MORE ARRIVALSREFILLED
QBBrady Hart · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
DBJulian Humphrey · PORTAL ★4 · GEORGIAAdonyss Currie · SIGNEE ★4Jamar Beal-Goines · SIGNEE ★43 MORE ARRIVALSREFILLED
LBNoah Mikhail · SIGNEE ★4Kelvion Riggins · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
OLLamont Rogers · SIGNEE ★4Marcus Garcia · SIGNEE ★4Nelson McGuire · SIGNEE ★41 MORE ARRIVALREFILLED
RBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · TEXAS A&M
CARRIED COMPOSITE
61.594 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
53.275 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
66.695 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB6666889764 OF 6 GRADED
RB595991831010 OF 10 GRADED
WR/TE636389412517 OF 25 GRADED
OL797987962018 OF 20 GRADED
DL797989542118 OF 21 GRADED
LB86867993128 OF 12 GRADED
DB606092932618 OF 26 GRADED
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE95th95
BLUE-CHIP RATIO73%97
RECRUITING CLASS#9 · 21/25 BC94
CLASS RANK TREND+6 · 3 CYCLES62
PORTAL NET BLUE-CHIP+1 · 13 IN / 30 OUT—
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 2nd YR—
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
LSUBRIAN KELLY4TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
9393
PACE
5454
PASS RATE
8484
EXPLOSIVENESS
5353
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
2929
HAVOC
5858
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
TA&MMIKE ELKO2TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 2 PROGRAMMES
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
3535
PACE
4040
PASS RATE
2323
EXPLOSIVENESS
3535
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
2929
HAVOC
9595
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESTA&M OFFENSELSU OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBTEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
35OF 136
TAL
88
PERF
66
RET
97
NATIONAL
11OF 136
RET
49
FULL DEFENSELSU DEFENSE
TA&M QUARTERBACKSn=63% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MARCEL REEDQBRET
624TH YR8589★4+29
JACOB ZENOQBPORTAL · UAB
484TH YR8345★3+35
BRADY HARTQBTRUE FR
482ND YR1993★4—
MILES O'NEILLQBRET
482ND YR2864★3—
ELI MORCOSQBTRUE FR
352ND YR—59★3—
SHOW ALL 6
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LSU DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 52 PLAYERS56% VACATED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
6740%61%
LINEBACKERSLB
6695%64%
SECONDARYDB
7429%55%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLTEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
4OF 136
TAL
87
PERF
79
RET
96
DL
21OF 136
DL RET
40
LB
23OF 136
LB RET
95
FRONT-7LSU DEFENSE
TA&M OFFENSIVE LINEn=204% VACATED
FIVE-MAN LINE BY GRADE
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TREY ZUHN IIIOLRET
874TH YR10089★4-15
AR'MAJ REED-ADAMSOLRET
864TH YR9385★3+24
MARK NABOU JR.OLRET
704TH YR8281★3+26
DAMETRIOUS CROWNOVEROLRET
664TH YR8982★3-28
CHASE BISONTISOLRET
623RD YR9099★4-16
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LSU FRONT-7n=32 · 2 ROOMS38% VACATED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
WHIT WEEKSLBRET
704TH YR9094★4+27
HAROLD PERKINS JR.LBRET
693RD YR99100★5+5
WEST WEEKSLBRET
664TH YR8173★3+13
BERNARD GOODENDLPORTAL · SOUTH FLORIDA
664TH YR8697★4+19
JACOBIAN GUILLORY IIDTRET
654TH YR8296★4+5
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBTEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
39OF 136
TAL
91
PERF
59
RET
83
DL
21OF 136
DL RET
40
LB
23OF 136
LB RET
95
FRONT-7LSU DEFENSE
TA&M RUNNING BACKSn=1017% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
LE'VEON MOSSRBRET
704TH YR9197★4+24
RUEBEN OWENS IIRBRET
574TH YR8499★5-49 2023
EJ SMITHRBRET
534TH YR7664★3-8
PRESTON LANDISRBRET
524TH YR22—★2+35
TIGER RIDEN JR.RBTRUE FR
502ND YR2185★4+8
SHOW ALL 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LSU FRONT-72 ROOMS · 32 PLAYERS36% VACATED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.556740%61%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.456695%64%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TETEXAS A&M OFFENSE
NATIONAL
34OF 136
TAL
89
PERF
63
RET
41
DB
3OF 136
DB RET
29
SECONDARYLSU DEFENSE
TA&M PASS CATCHERSn=2559% VACATED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MARIO CRAVERWRPORTAL · MISSISSIPPI STATE
833RD YR8697★4+29
KC CONCEPCIONWRPORTAL · NC STATE
753RD YR9999★4+24
NATE BOERKIRCHERTEPORTAL · NEBRASKA
664TH YR7764★3+4
THEO MELIN OHRSTROMTERET
584TH YR7592★4+38
AMARI NIBLACKTEPORTAL · TEXAS
564TH YR7595★4+32
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
LSU SECONDARYn=20 · 1 ROOM71% VACATED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
A.J. HAULCYSPORTAL · HOUSTON
814TH YR10092★4+0
MANSOOR DELANECBPORTAL · VIRGINIA TECH
804TH YR10095★4-10
JAVIEN TOVIANOSRET
753RD YR6464★3-3
DASHAWN SPEARSSRET
703RD YR6196★4+51
DJ PICKETTCBTRUE FR
692ND YR65100★5+18
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
TA&M
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
LSU
SCOUT TEAM GRADE
71.2
62.3
— OFFENSE
67.5
55.6
— DEFENSE
75.0
68.9
SP+ OVERALL
20.7
10.3
FPI
18.4
10.7
ELO
1872
1675
TALENT
917
920
PRODUCTION
93
77
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+2
+19
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.73
0.69
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
TA&M
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
LSU
OFF EFFICIENCY
77
25
DEF EFFICIENCY
97
75
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
49
45
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
1
50
FINISHING DRIVES
83
13
FIELD POSITION
7
38
TURNOVER MARGIN
11
92
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
TA&M
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
LSU
PASS RATE
45.1%
57.5%
PROE
−0.2
+8.5
PACE
26.6s
28.6s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
19%
11%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
58.7%
48.7%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
54.8%
68.9%
PLAYS / GAME
67.7
62.9
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
0.3%
1.5%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = TA&M, ORANGE = LSU) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2025, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE