SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2024 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2024›WEEK 8›RICE @ TULN›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
SC @ OU82
FSU @ DUKE76
NEB @ IU75
MIA @ LOU74
UNM @ USU74
KSU @ WVU74
TOL @ NIU72
COLO @ ARIZ72
LSU @ ARK71
AUB @ MIZ70
WIS @ NU69
ALA @ TENN69
UK @ FLA69
TCU @ UTAH68
ORE @ PUR67
UGA @ TEX67
OKST @ BYU66
USC @ MD66
SMU @ STAN66
ASU @ CIN63
UCLA @ RUTG63
HOU @ KU63
BAY @ TTU63
BC @ VT61
ND @ GT60
UCF @ ISU59
RICE @ TULN57
MICH @ ILL56
TA&M @ MSST56
UNLV @ ORST56
IOWA @ MSU55
UVA @ CLEM53
OHIO @ M-OH53
UL @ CCU52
KENT @ BGSU52
CMU @ EMU51
TROY @ USA49
WAKE @ CONN49
CLT @ NAVY49
UNT @ MEM49
NCSU @ CAL48
ECU @ ARMY47
FAU @ UTSA47
JMU @ GASO47
BALL @ VAN47
TXST @ ODU46
WKU @ SHSU45
FRES @ NEV45
TLSA @ TEM44
WMU @ BUF44
LT @ NMSU43
GAST @ MRSH39
UAB @ USF39
CSU @ AF39
WYO @ SJSU38
FIU @ UTEP34
HAW @ WSU34
ARST @ USM32
KENN @ MTSU26
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
RICE
TULANE
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2024
SAT 15:30 ET|YULMAN STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP28|O/U53.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
104FPI
RICEAACRICE
10
4-8
28
18
68
47%
28
47
16.0
+1000
+21.5
HOME
—AP
27FPI
TULNAACTULANE
24
9-5
55
86
70
30%
38
38
37.5
-1800
-21.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2024CONSENSUS · DRAFTKINGS
FINALRICE10—TULN24
CLOSED TULN -21.5TOTAL 53.5RICE COVERED · 34 POINTS · UNDER
RICE
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
TULN
10
POINTS
24
344
TOTAL YARDS
307
271 (26-46)
PASSING
152 (12-25)
73 (17)
RUSHING
155 (39)
16
FIRST DOWNS
18
5-13
THIRD DOWN
6-15
0-1
FOURTH DOWN
0-2
25:03
TIME OF POSS.
34:57
4-31
PENALTIES
5-35
5
TURNOVERS
0
2
SACKS
1
1
QB HURRIES
5
RICE
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
TULN
0.076
SEASON 0.145
EPA / PLAY
0.087
SEASON 0.376
40.4%
SEASON 37.4%
SUCCESS RATE
38.1%
SEASON 48.5%
15.8%
SEASON 14.1%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
17.5%
SEASON 19.3%
5.86
SEASON 5.74
YARDS / PLAY
4.83
SEASON 6.76
0.087
SEASON 0.163
EPA ALLOWED
0.076
SEASON 0.143
38.1%
SEASON 36.8%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
40.4%
SEASON 37.2%
17.5%
SEASON 14.3%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
15.8%
SEASON 14.3%
13.5%
SEASON 13.8%
STUFF RATE
40.0%
SEASON 18.4%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2024 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 8 FIELD n=59
MARKET
TOTAL53.5
SPREADTULN -21.5
IMPLIED — RICE16.0
IMPLIED — TULN37.5
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
41FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
27 / 59
BY ENVIRONMENT
49 / 59
DISAGREEMENT22 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 22 positions on a 59-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
SLOW × MIDDLING
RICE PACE28.9s
28
TULN PACE28.5s
38
SHARED PACE28.7s
33
PLAY VOLUME125
33
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
RICE65CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
73
PROE
95
TEMPO
28
EXPLOSIVE73p
73
PROE95p
95
TEMPO28p
28
TULN32CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
48
PROE
10
TEMPO
38
EXPLOSIVE48p
48
PROE10p
10
TEMPO38p
38
IS THE RECORD REAL2024 · FULL SEASON
RICERECORD UNDERSTATES
4-8ACTUALvs5.0-7.0FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-1.0 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-3
POINT MARGIN / GAME-3.3
RICE won 4 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 5.0. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TULNRECORD UNDERSTATES
9-4ACTUALvs10.6-2.4FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-1.6 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-1
POINT MARGIN / GAME+17.5
TULANE won 9 of 13 against a scoring profile describing 10.6. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERRICETULANE2024 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB64%JT DanielsQB · 64% OF ROOM PARTICIPATION
DL55%Coleman CocoDE · 25% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONDe'Braylon CarrollPORTAL · TEXAS TECH · 24% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL48%Lavel DumontOL · 17% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONBraedon NutterOL · 17% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONClay ServinOL · 14% OF ROOM PARTICIPATION
WR/TE35%Luke McCaffreyDRAFTED · 21% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONJack BradleyTE · 11% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
RB35%Juma OtovianoRB · 29% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONAri BroussardRB · 6% OF ROOM PARTICIPATION
DB18%Tre'Shon DevonesPORTAL · DUKE · 18% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
LB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBE.J. Warner · PORTAL ★3 · TEMPLEDrew Devillier · SIGNEE ★3REFILLED
DLCharles Looes · PORTAL ★3 · DARTMOUTHMichael Daley · PORTAL ★3 · BYUREFILLED
OLChad Lindberg · PORTAL ★3 · GEORGIASpencer Cassell · PORTAL ★3 · HARVARDLuke Miller · SIGNEE ★33 MORE ARRIVALSREFILLED
WR/TEGraham Walker · PORTAL ★3 · BROWNThai Chiaokhiao-Bowman · PORTAL ★3 · FLORIDAOwen Carter · SIGNEE ★31 MORE ARRIVALREFILLED
RBColeman Bennett · PORTAL ★3 · BUCKNELLTaji Atkins · SIGNEE ★3Trei Kibbles · SIGNEE ★3REFILLED
DBFaybian Marks · PORTAL ★3 · UTAHLaVonte Johnson · SIGNEE ★3Bailey Fletcher · SIGNEE ★31 MORE ARRIVALREFILLED
LBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · RICE
CARRIED COMPOSITE
62.884 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
49.247 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
70.891 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB777745052 OF 5 GRADED
RB53532794116 OF 11 GRADED
WR/TE414144802515 OF 25 GRADED
OL616159692113 OF 21 GRADED
DL585825681311 OF 13 GRADED
LB58583886138 OF 13 GRADED
DB535348942517 OF 25 GRADED
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE28th28
BLUE-CHIP RATIO1%6
RECRUITING CLASS#122 · 0/13 BC9
CLASS RANK TREND-3 · 3 CYCLES44
PORTAL NET BLUE-CHIP0 · 10 IN / 3 OUT—
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 7th YR—
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
TULNJON SUMRALLFIRST SEASON4 SEASONS · 2 PROGRAMMES
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
4848
PACE
4545
PASS RATE
2828
EXPLOSIVENESS
6565
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
4646
HAVOC
7575
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
RICEMIKE BLOOMGREN7TH SEASON3 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
8484
PACE
2222
PASS RATE
8686
EXPLOSIVENESS
7878
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
6565
HAVOC
4646
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESRICE OFFENSETULN OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBRICE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
13OF 132
TAL
45
PERF
77
RET
0
NATIONAL
21OF 134
RET
52
FULL DEFENSETULANE DEFENSE
RICE QUARTERBACKSn=5100% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CHASE JENKINSQBRET
493RD YR2345★3—
E.J. WARNERQBPORTAL · TEMPLE
484TH YR9945★3-7
DREW DEVILLIERQBTRUE FR
473RD YR2955★3-46
AJ PADGETTQBRET
433RD YR—33★3-14 2023
SHAWQI ITRAISHQBRET
414TH YR—2★3-44 2023
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TULN DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 51 PLAYERS53% VACATED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
6977%8%
LINEBACKERSLB
6349%0%
SECONDARYDB
6732%4%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLRICE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
34OF 134
TAL
59
PERF
61
RET
69
DL
28OF 134
DL RET
77
LB
32OF 134
LB RET
49
FRONT-7TULANE DEFENSE
RICE OFFENSIVE LINEn=2131% VACATED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
BRANT BANKSOLRET
534TH YR8567★3+7
JOHN LONGOLRET
474TH YR6930★3+5
JOSH PEARCYOLRET
474TH YR—18★3—
ETHAN ONIANWAOTRET
464TH YR9495★4-35
DAVID STICKLEOLTRUE FR
464TH YR69—UNR+11
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TULN FRONT-7n=27 · 2 ROOMS34% VACATED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
KAMERON HAMILTONDERET
764TH YR7843★3+25
ADIN HUNTINGTONDLPORTAL · UL MONROE
744TH YR8564★3+35
PARKER PETERSENDLRET
734TH YR5185★3+8
TERRELL ALLENLBPORTAL · TENNESSEE STATE
714TH YR44—UNR—
PATRICK JENKINSDLRET
574TH YR9891★4+6
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBRICE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
67OF 134
TAL
27
PERF
53
RET
94
DL
28OF 134
DL RET
77
LB
32OF 134
LB RET
49
FRONT-7TULANE DEFENSE
RICE RUNNING BACKSn=116% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DEAN CONNORSRBRET
554TH YR9028★3+19
TAJI ATKINSRBTRUE FR
532ND YR3040★3+32
CHRISTIAN FRANCISCORBRET
523RD YR27—UNR-47
QUINTON JACKSONRBRET
484TH YR4722★3+9
COLEMAN BENNETTRBPORTAL · BUCKNELL
364TH YR51★2—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TULN FRONT-72 ROOMS · 27 PLAYERS36% VACATED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.556977%8%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.456349%0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TERICE OFFENSE
NATIONAL
116OF 133
TAL
44
PERF
41
RET
80
DB
14OF 134
DB RET
32
SECONDARYTULANE DEFENSE
RICE PASS CATCHERSn=2520% VACATED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MATT SYKESWRRET
584TH YR8883★3-1
MICAH BARNETTTERET
574TH YR26—UNR—
GRAHAM WALKERTEPORTAL · BROWN
524TH YR609★3+2
BODEN GROENTERET
504TH YR8364★3-8
JOVONI JOHNSON-MCCRAYWRRET
484TH YR40—UNR-38
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TULN SECONDARYn=24 · 1 ROOM68% VACATED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MICAH ROBINSONDBPORTAL · FURMAN
893RD YR6545★30
JACK TCHIENCHOUSPORTAL · TROY
663RD YR5817★3+48
JAVION WHITEDBTRUE FR
633RD YR4578★3+46
KEVIN ADAMS IIISRET
583RD YR5746★3+4
CALEB RANSAWSPORTAL · TROY
543RD YR9278★3+14
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
RICE
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TULN
SCOUT TEAM GRADE
56.1
66.0
— OFFENSE
55.7
65.5
— DEFENSE
56.5
66.4
SP+ OVERALL
-11.4
5.7
FPI
-8.6
10.5
ELO
1239
1674
TALENT
538
654
PRODUCTION
19
68
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+7
−14
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.01
0.11
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
RICE
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TULN
OFF EFFICIENCY
9
85
DEF EFFICIENCY
92
89
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
74
48
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
24
50
FINISHING DRIVES
3
84
FIELD POSITION
8
3
TURNOVER MARGIN
8
91
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
RICE
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TULN
PASS RATE
62.5%
37.2%
PROE
+11.4
−7.6
PACE
28.9s
28.5s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
20%
25%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
48.2%
69.0%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
80.6%
51.2%
PLAYS / GAME
62.2
63.1
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.5%
3.9%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = RICE, ORANGE = TULN) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2024, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE