SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2023 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2023›WEEK 10›TCU @ TTU›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
WASH @ USC84
LSU @ ALA82
NEB @ MSU76
IOWA @ NU73
OU @ OKST73
ND @ CLEM72
ORST @ COLO69
GASO @ TXST68
VT @ LOU67
KU @ ISU67
UK @ MSST67
UCLA @ ARIZ67
WAKE @ DUKE66
KSU @ TEX66
PUR @ MICH66
BOIS @ FRES66
GT @ UVA65
FSU @ PITT65
MIA @ NCSU65
TA&M @ MISS64
ASU @ UTAH64
JMU @ GAST63
UNLV @ UNM63
ARK @ FLA62
PSU @ MD62
OSU @ RUTG61
TCU @ TTU60
FAU @ UAB60
MIZ @ UGA60
UCF @ CIN60
CAL @ ORE60
USA @ TROY59
BC @ SYR59
CONN @ TENN59
BUF @ TOL55
LT @ LIB54
BALL @ BGSU53
UTSA @ UNT53
TULN @ ECU53
HAW @ NEV53
USU @ SDSU53
SMU @ RICE53
JXST @ SC52
AUB @ VAN52
MTSU @ NMSU52
STAN @ WSU52
ILL @ MINN51
NAVY @ TEM50
CCU @ ODU50
USF @ MEM49
MRSH @ APP47
NIU @ CMU46
WIS @ IU46
BYU @ WVU46
KENT @ AKR44
CSU @ WYO44
UL @ ARST44
ARMY @ AF43
CLT @ TLSA43
HOU @ BAY42
ULM @ USM41
WKU @ UTEP41
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
TCU
TEXAS TECH
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2023
THU 19:00 ET|JONES AT&T STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP15|O/U59.0COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
28FPI
TCUB12TCU
28
5-7
87
84
49
14%
93
80
28.3
+130
+2.5
HOME
—AP
39FPI
TTUB12TEXAS TECH
35
7-6
72
36
70
76%
91
93
30.8
-150
-2.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2023CONSENSUS · BOVADA
FINALTCU28—TTU35
CLOSED TTU -2.5TOTAL 59.0TTU COVERED · 63 POINTS · OVER
TCU
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
TTU
28
POINTS
35
440
TOTAL YARDS
428
353 (32-52)
PASSING
282 (28-36)
87 (26)
RUSHING
146 (42)
26
FIRST DOWNS
22
10-18
THIRD DOWN
7-18
2-2
FOURTH DOWN
2-3
25:35
TIME OF POSS.
34:25
5-41
PENALTIES
8-72
2
TURNOVERS
0
2
SACKS
0
2
QB HURRIES
4
TCU
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
TTU
0.267
SEASON 0.271
EPA / PLAY
0.205
SEASON 0.176
48.0%
SEASON 46.8%
SUCCESS RATE
40.3%
SEASON 43.2%
13.0%
SEASON 16.8%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
11.7%
SEASON 13.5%
5.57
SEASON 6.42
YARDS / PLAY
5.60
SEASON 5.47
0.205
SEASON 0.222
EPA ALLOWED
0.267
SEASON 0.199
40.3%
SEASON 43.3%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
48.0%
SEASON 42.1%
11.7%
SEASON 14.7%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
13.0%
SEASON 14.6%
33.3%
SEASON 15.6%
STUFF RATE
11.5%
SEASON 13.6%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2023 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT7 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 10 FIELD n=62
MARKET
TOTAL59.0
SPREADTTU -2.5
IMPLIED — TCU28.3
IMPLIED — TTU30.8
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
58FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
11 / 62
BY ENVIRONMENT
14 / 62
DISAGREEMENT3 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 3 positions on a 62-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × FAST
TCU PACE25.3s
93
TTU PACE25.5s
91
SHARED PACE25.4s
92
PLAY VOLUME142
92
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
TCU83CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
66
PROE
89
TEMPO
93
EXPLOSIVE66p
66
PROE89p
89
TEMPO93p
93
TTU60CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
22
PROE
68
TEMPO
91
EXPLOSIVE22p
22
PROE68p
68
TEMPO91p
91
IS THE RECORD REAL2023 · FULL SEASON
TCURECORD UNDERSTATES
5-7ACTUALvs6.8-5.2FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-1.8 W
ONE SCORE RECORD0-4
POINT MARGIN / GAME+3.5
TCU won 5 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 6.8. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TTURECORD MATCHES
6-6ACTUALvs6.0-6.0FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.0 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-3
POINT MARGIN / GAME-0.2
TEXAS TECH won 6 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 6.0. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERTCUTEXAS TECH2023 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB94%Max DugganQB · 94% OF ROOM PARTICIPATION
RB84%Kendre MillerRB · 51% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONEmari DemercadoRB · 33% OF ROOM PARTICIPATION
WR/TE63%Quentin JohnstonWR · 15% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONTaye BarberWR · 12% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONDerius DavisWR · 11% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION9 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DL56%Dylan HortonDL · 22% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONTerrell CooperDL · 18% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONGeorge Ellis IIIDL · 10% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL51%Steve AvilaC · 19% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONAlan AliOL · 19% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONWes HarrisG · 12% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
LB28%Dee WintersLB · 27% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
DB25%Tre'Vius Hodges-TomlinsonCB · 19% OF ROOM PARTICIPATIONROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNONE THIS CYCLEOPEN
RBTrey Sanders · PORTAL ★3 · ALABAMACam Cook · SIGNEE ★4PARTIAL
WR/TEJoJo Earle · PORTAL ★4 · ALABAMAJohn Paul Richardson · PORTAL ★3 · OKLAHOMA STATEJaylon Robinson · PORTAL ★3 · OLE MISS5 MORE ARRIVALSREFILLED
DLTico Brown · PORTAL ★3 · MISSOURI STATEMarkis Deal · SIGNEE ★4Avion Carter · SIGNEE ★43 MORE ARRIVALSREFILLED
OLTommy Brockermeyer · PORTAL ★4 · ALABAMAWillis Patrick · PORTAL ★3 · JACKSON STATEPARTIAL
LBKylan Salter · SIGNEE ★3PARTIAL
DBAvery Helm · PORTAL ★4 · FLORIDARandon Fontenette · SIGNEE ★4Javeon Wilcox · SIGNEE ★41 MORE ARRIVALREFILLED
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · TCU
CARRIED COMPOSITE
49.939 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
21.73 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
65.181 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB75758910063 OF 6 GRADED
RB4242597876 OF 7 GRADED
WR/TE636375492918 OF 29 GRADED
OL777766522111 OF 21 GRADED
DL434382851614 OF 16 GRADED
LB61615299189 OF 18 GRADED
DB525275742319 OF 23 GRADED
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE87th87
BLUE-CHIP RATIO35%84
RECRUITING CLASS#21 · 7/21 BC85
CLASS RANK TREND+40 · 3 CYCLES100
PORTAL NET BLUE-CHIP-2 · 13 IN / 17 OUT—
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 2nd YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX41%75
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
TTUJOEY MCGUIRE2TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
8282
PACE
9999
PASS RATE
7373
EXPLOSIVENESS
7171
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
8181
HAVOC
6969
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
TCUSONNY DYKES2TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
8585
PACE
8181
PASS RATE
7878
EXPLOSIVENESS
7777
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
7272
HAVOC
2626
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESTCU OFFENSETTU OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
14OF 133
TAL
89
PERF
75
RET
100
NATIONAL
31OF 133
RET
64
FULL DEFENSETEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU QUARTERBACKSn=60% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JOSH HOOVERQBRET
544TH YR6698★4+9
CHANDLER MORRISQBRET
544TH YR6278★3+27
GRANT TISDALEQBTRUE FR
484TH YR286★3—
JACOB PORTERQBRET
323RD YR—5★2—
JIMMY WEIRICKQBTRUE FR
324TH YR—1★2—
SHOW ALL 6
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 58 PLAYERS37% VACATED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
5775%0%
LINEBACKERSLB
3869%10%
SECONDARYDB
6955%17%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
5OF 133
TAL
66
PERF
77
RET
52
DL
48OF 133
DL RET
75
LB
109OF 133
LB RET
69
FRONT-7TEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU OFFENSIVE LINEn=2148% VACATED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
BRANDON COLEMANOLRET
844TH YR9614★2-16
WILLIS PATRICKOLPORTAL · JACKSON STATE
774TH YR7289★3+53
JOHN LANZOLRET
764TH YR8262★3+25
ANDREW COKEROLRET
563RD YR9581★3-21
GARRETT HAYESOLRET
523RD YR2496★4—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU FRONT-7n=34 · 2 ROOMS27% VACATED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JAYLON HUTCHINGSDLRET
834TH YR9326★3-3
BEN ROBERTSLBRET
714TH YR7956★3-3
TONY BRADFORD JR.DLRET
684TH YR9542★3+15
TRE'VON MCALPINEDTRET
644TH YR3964★3—
E'MAURION BANKSDLRET
564TH YR5074★3-8
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
99OF 133
TAL
59
PERF
42
RET
78
DL
48OF 133
DL RET
75
LB
109OF 133
LB RET
69
FRONT-7TEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU RUNNING BACKSn=722% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TRENT BATTLERBRET
504TH YR3067★3+20
TREY SANDERSRBPORTAL · ALABAMA
504TH YR5189★3-9
EMANI BAILEYRBRET
493RD YR8948★3+24
CAM COOKRBTRUE FR
484TH YR2878★3-56
FRANKLIN ESTRADA IIRBRET
334TH YR2—UNR—
SHOW ALL 7
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU FRONT-72 ROOMS · 34 PLAYERS28% VACATED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.555775%0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.453869%10%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TETCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
30OF 133
TAL
75
PERF
63
RET
49
DB
7OF 133
DB RET
55
SECONDARYTEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU PASS CATCHERSn=2951% VACATED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JARED WILEYTERET
704TH YR8673★3+27
SAVION WILLIAMSWRRET
544TH YR9582★3+6
JP RICHARDSONWRTRUE FR
544TH YR9556★3+4
DJ ROGERSTERET
544TH YR3588★4—
JOJO EARLEWRPORTAL · ALABAMA
514TH YR7245★3+3
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU SECONDARYn=24 · 1 ROOM45% VACATED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DADRION TAYLOR-DEMERSONDBRET
734TH YR10029★3+11
C.J. BASKERVILLEDBTRUE FR
704TH YR9256★3+18
BRALYN LUXDBPORTAL · FRESNO STATE
584TH YR88—★2-24
CHAPMAN LEWISSTRUE FR
553RD YR4017★3—
MO HORNCBRET
534TH YR3764★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
TCU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TTU
SCOUT TEAM GRADE
58.6
54.8
— OFFENSE
65.4
54.9
— DEFENSE
51.9
54.7
SP+ OVERALL
7.9
6.1
FPI
9.5
6.2
ELO
1631
1562
TALENT
768
694
PRODUCTION
74
68
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+12
+2
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.35
0.14
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
TCU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TTU
OFF EFFICIENCY
85
57
DEF EFFICIENCY
35
58
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
67
22
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
30
63
FINISHING DRIVES
49
74
FIELD POSITION
40
38
TURNOVER MARGIN
8
9
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
TCU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TTU
PASS RATE
58.2%
52.4%
PROE
+8.4
+2.7
PACE
25.3s
25.5s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
33%
35%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
47.4%
56.2%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
70.5%
72.4%
PLAYS / GAME
71.2
70.5
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
2.9%
0.3%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = TCU, ORANGE = TTU) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2023, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE