SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2022 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2022›WEEK 1›TTU @ MISS›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
UNC @ APP78
ARMY @ CCU77
ILL @ IU74
LIB @ USM72
HOU @ UTSA71
ORE @ UGA71
LSU @ FSU71
PSU @ PUR70
MTSU @ JMU67
CSU @ MICH65
BYU @ USF65
BOIS @ ORST65
TCU @ COLO64
UTAH @ FLA64
ULM @ TEX64
BALL @ TENN63
BUF @ MD63
SMU @ UNT63
USU @ ALA63
ND @ OSU62
TEM @ DUKE60
TLSA @ WYO60
M-OH @ UK60
CLEM @ GT60
NMSU @ MINN59
RUTG @ BC58
UTEP @ OU58
KENT @ WASH58
WVU @ PITT57
MASS @ TULN57
LT @ MIZ56
CMU @ OKST53
CIN @ ARK53
LOU @ SYR52
RICE @ USC51
FAU @ OHIO50
VT @ ODU47
MEM @ MSST47
GAST @ SC47
BGSU @ UCLA46
TROY @ MISS45
TXST @ NEV44
NCSU @ ECU42
ARIZ @ SDSU39
WMU @ MSU37
WKU @ HAW30
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
TEXAS TECH
OLE MISS
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2022
WED 21:00 ET|NRG STADIUMNONCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP15|O/U72.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
28FPI
TTUB12TEXAS TECH
42
8-5
69
77
92
56%
100
94
34.3
—
+4.0
HOME
—AP
18FPI
MISSSECOLE MISS
25
8-5
84
82
46
3%
96
77
38.3
—
-4.0
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2022CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALTTU42—MISS25
CLOSED MISS -4.0TOTAL 72.5TTU COVERED · 67 POINTS · UNDER
TTU
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
MISS
42
POINTS
25
486
TOTAL YARDS
558
242 (24-40)
PASSING
361 (25-40)
244 (47)
RUSHING
197 (43)
27
FIRST DOWNS
27
7-19
THIRD DOWN
5-13
5-6
FOURTH DOWN
2-7
32:46
TIME OF POSS.
26:28
3-15
PENALTIES
7-81
3
TURNOVERS
4
—
SACKS
—
—
QB HURRIES
—
TTU
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
MISS
0.221
SEASON 0.264
EPA / PLAY
0.317
SEASON 0.295
43.5%
SEASON 42.8%
SUCCESS RATE
49.4%
SEASON 48.2%
14.1%
SEASON 15.3%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
21.5%
SEASON 19.3%
5.95
SEASON 5.71
YARDS / PLAY
6.75
SEASON 6.56
0.317
SEASON 0.122
EPA ALLOWED
0.221
SEASON 0.159
49.4%
SEASON 37.4%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
43.5%
SEASON 43.1%
21.5%
SEASON 16.4%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
14.1%
SEASON 14.8%
36.6%
SEASON 19.2%
STUFF RATE
13.6%
SEASON 15.8%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2022 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 1 FIELD n=46
MARKET
TOTAL72.5
SPREADMISS -4.0
IMPLIED — TTU34.3
IMPLIED — MISS38.3
PACE COLLISION
FAST × FAST
TTU PACE22.9s
100
MISS PACE24.0s
96
SHARED PACE23.4s
98
PLAY VOLUME154
98
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
TTU89CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
86
PROE
81
TEMPO
100
EXPLOSIVE86p
86
PROE81p
81
TEMPO100p
100
MISS54CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
54
PROE
13
TEMPO
96
EXPLOSIVE54p
54
PROE13p
13
TEMPO96p
96
IS THE RECORD REAL2022 · FULL SEASON
TTURECORD MATCHES
7-5ACTUALvs6.9-5.1FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.1 W
ONE SCORE RECORD4-0
POINT MARGIN / GAME+4.1
TEXAS TECH won 7 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 6.9. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
MISSRECORD MATCHES
8-4ACTUALvs8.3-3.7FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.3 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+10.0
OLE MISS won 8 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 8.3. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERTEXAS TECHOLE MISS2022 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Henry ColombiPORTAL · MARSHALL · SHARE NOT MEASURED
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%Erik EzukanmaWR · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION5 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%Dawson DeatonOL · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
DL0%Troy Te'ODL · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%Colin SchoolerLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB0%Damarcus FieldsDB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TETK King · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLErik Gray · SIGNEE ★3Sheridan Wilson · SIGNEE ★3Seth Martin · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DLJoseph Adedire · SIGNEE ★3Tre'Von McAlpine · SIGNEE ★3Syncere Massey · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
LBTy Kana · SIGNEE ★3Ben Roberts · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DBLandon Hullaby · SIGNEE ★3Jalon Peoples · SIGNEE ★3Hut Graham · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · TEXAS TECH
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB54548310033 OF 3 GRADED
RB5454549665 OF 6 GRADED
WR/TE494960812619 OF 26 GRADED
OL41415902011 OF 20 GRADED
DL797948661410 OF 14 GRADED
LB606062782115 OF 21 GRADED
DB545438942417 OF 24 GRADED
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE69th69
BLUE-CHIP RATIO10%57
RECRUITING CLASS#43 · 1/18 BC68
CLASS RANK TREND+6 · 3 CYCLES62
COACH STATUSNEW HEAD COACH—
DEV TRANSITION MIX14%12
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
MISSLANE KIFFIN3TH SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
4848
PACE
9797
PASS RATE
2020
EXPLOSIVENESS
8686
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
8585
HAVOC
8989
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
TTUJOEY MCGUIREFIRST SEASON4 SEASONS · 1 PROGRAMME
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED
8282
PACE
9999
PASS RATE
7373
EXPLOSIVENESS
7171
FOURTH-DOWN AGGRESSION
8181
HAVOC
6969
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESTTU OFFENSEMISS OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBTEXAS TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
71OF 131
TAL
83
PERF
54
RET
100
NATIONAL
35OF 131
RET
0
FULL DEFENSEOLE MISS DEFENSE
TTU QUARTERBACKSn=30% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TYLER SHOUGHQBRET
544TH YR6778★3+31
BEHREN MORTONQBRET
504TH YR6594★4-27
DONOVAN SMITHQBRET
464TH YR7078★3+20
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
MISS DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 58 PLAYERS38% VACATED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
5763%31%
LINEBACKERSLB
5743%20%
SECONDARYDB
6568%33%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLTEXAS TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
99OF 131
TAL
59
PERF
41
RET
0
DL
39OF 131
DL RET
63
LB
44OF 131
LB RET
43
FRONT-7OLE MISS DEFENSE
TTU OFFENSIVE LINEn=20100% VACATED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
WESTON WRIGHTOLRET
634TH YR9835★3+9
JACOBY JACKSONOLRET
494TH YR7564★3-1
LANDON PETERSONOLTRUE FR
734TH YR6345★3+27
DENNIS WILBURNOLTRUE FR
494TH YR100—UNR-6
CADE BRIGGSOLTRUE FR
484TH YR2133★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
MISS FRONT-7n=31 · 2 ROOMS45% VACATED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CEDRIC JOHNSONDERET
794TH YR7359★3+48
JJ PEGUESDTTRUE FR
704TH YR7391★4+6
TYWONE MALONE JR.DTRET
584TH YR4198★4—
TAVIUS ROBINSONDERET
544TH YR92—UNR+24
ASHANTI CISTRUNKLBRET
534TH YR6972★3+15
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBTEXAS TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
61OF 131
TAL
54
PERF
54
RET
96
DL
39OF 131
DL RET
63
LB
44OF 131
LB RET
43
FRONT-7OLE MISS DEFENSE
TTU RUNNING BACKSn=64% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
SARODORICK THOMPSONRBRET
664TH YR8527★3+17
TAHJ BROOKSRBRET
654TH YR8874★3+26
CAM'RON VALDEZRBRET
523RD YR3681★3+40
BRYSON DONNELLRBTRUE FR
523RD YR3380★3-23
BLAKE BEDWELLRBTRUE FR
372ND YR7—UNR—
SHOW ALL 6
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
MISS FRONT-72 ROOMS · 31 PLAYERS46% VACATED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.555763%31%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.455743%20%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TETEXAS TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
82OF 131
TAL
60
PERF
49
RET
81
DB
10OF 131
DB RET
68
SECONDARYOLE MISS DEFENSE
TTU PASS CATCHERSn=2619% VACATED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JERAND BRADLEYWRRET
644TH YR9564★3+18
MASON THARPTERET
624TH YR7266★3-17
LOIC FOUONJIWRRET
594TH YR8085★3+15
XAVIER WHITEWRRET
594TH YR86—UNR+23
HENRY TEETERTERET
564TH YR5113★2-18
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
MISS SECONDARYn=27 · 1 ROOM32% VACATED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
OTIS REESESRET
814TH YR9396★4+39
LADARIUS TENNISONDBTRUE FR
754TH YR7785★3+35
TYSHEEM JOHNSONDBRET
714TH YR8989★3+25
MILES BATTLECBRET
594TH YR6995★4-38
DEANTRE PRINCECBRET
584TH YR9784★3+13
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
TTU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
MISS
SCOUT TEAM GRADE
56.4
65.0
— OFFENSE
48.4
70.3
— DEFENSE
64.4
59.8
SP+ OVERALL
8.5
16.2
FPI
8.3
12.3
ELO
1633
1634
TALENT
660
757
PRODUCTION
69
89
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−2
−6
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.10
0.31
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
TTU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
MISS
OFF EFFICIENCY
45
87
DEF EFFICIENCY
78
36
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
85
53
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
16
83
FINISHING DRIVES
75
58
FIELD POSITION
20
90
TURNOVER MARGIN
23
33
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
TTU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
MISS
PASS RATE
56.1%
40.1%
PROE
+6.3
−7.4
PACE
22.9s
24.0s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
35%
35%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
49.8%
65.5%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
67.9%
53.3%
PLAYS / GAME
78.7
74.9
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
0.8%
0.6%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = TTU, ORANGE = MISS) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2022, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE