SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2017 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2017›WEEK 12›TCU @ TTU›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
FRES @ WYO78
ARMY @ UNT77
MICH @ WIS75
ARIZ @ ORE75
PUR @ IOWA72
NCSU @ WAKE70
TCU @ TTU68
UK @ UGA67
TA&M @ MISS67
SMU @ MEM66
MIZ @ VAN66
ULM @ AUB65
GT @ DUKE65
MINN @ NU64
ILL @ OSU64
UCLA @ USC63
ASU @ ORST62
SYR @ LOU62
NAVY @ ND61
NEB @ PSU61
LSU @ TENN61
MSST @ ARK60
TEX @ WVU59
KSU @ OKST59
RUTG @ IU58
UVA @ MIA58
PITT @ VT58
MRSH @ UTSA58
UTAH @ WASH58
EMU @ M-OH57
OU @ KU57
NMSU @ UL56
WMU @ NIU55
AF @ BOIS55
MTSU @ WKU54
UNLV @ UNM54
CIN @ ECU54
ISU @ BAY54
MD @ MSU54
FIU @ FAU54
OHIO @ AKR53
MASS @ BYU52
BC @ CONN51
UCF @ TEM49
TOL @ BGSU48
HAW @ USU48
SJSU @ CSU48
USA @ GASO47
TXST @ ARST47
HOU @ TULN45
CAL @ STAN45
CMU @ KENT44
CLT @ USM42
NEV @ SDSU42
TLSA @ USF38
RICE @ ODU33
LT @ UTEP33
BUF @ BALL30
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
TCU
TEXAS TECH
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2017
SAT 12:00 ET|JONES AT&T STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP14|O/U53.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
#9AP
12FPI
TCUB12TCU
27
10-3
77
68
98
101%
37
56
30.0
—
-6.5
HOME
—AP
42FPI
TTUB12TEXAS TECH
3
6-6
63
78
34
34%
88
—
23.5
—
+6.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2017CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALTCU27—TTU3
CLOSED TCU -6.5TOTAL 53.5TCU COVERED · 30 POINTS · UNDER
TCU
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
TTU
27
POINTS
3
289
TOTAL YARDS
327
85 (6-17)
PASSING
153 (18-36)
204 (42)
RUSHING
174 (41)
17
FIRST DOWNS
21
4-12
THIRD DOWN
9-20
0-0
FOURTH DOWN
1-2
30:00
TIME OF POSS.
30:00
6-55
PENALTIES
5-55
1
TURNOVERS
2
3
SACKS
1
1
QB HURRIES
3
TCU
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
TTU
0.178
SEASON 0.266
EPA / PLAY
0.002
SEASON 0.266
43.4%
SEASON 46.1%
SUCCESS RATE
40.0%
SEASON 44.8%
15.1%
SEASON 16.6%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
10.7%
SEASON 15.7%
5.75
SEASON 6.27
YARDS / PLAY
4.15
SEASON 6.28
0.002
SEASON 0.088
EPA ALLOWED
0.178
SEASON 0.263
40.0%
SEASON 32.7%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
43.4%
SEASON 45.2%
10.7%
SEASON 13.0%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
15.1%
SEASON 15.7%
10.8%
SEASON 24.2%
STUFF RATE
16.2%
SEASON 13.9%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2017 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 12 FIELD n=58
MARKET
TOTAL53.5
SPREADTCU -6.5
IMPLIED — TCU30.0
IMPLIED — TTU23.5
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
60FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
33 / 58
BY ENVIRONMENT
17 / 58
DISAGREEMENT16 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 16 positions on a 58-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
MIDDLING × FAST
TCU PACE27.0s
37
TTU PACE24.4s
88
SHARED PACE25.7s
62
PLAY VOLUME141
62
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
TCU39CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
42
TEMPO
37
EXPLOSIVE42p
42
TEMPO37p
37
TTU68CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
48
TEMPO
88
EXPLOSIVE48p
48
TEMPO88p
88
IS THE RECORD REAL2017 · FULL SEASON
TCURECORD MATCHES
10-3ACTUALvs10.6-2.4FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.6 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-1
POINT MARGIN / GAME+15.5
TCU won 10 of 13 against a scoring profile describing 10.6. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TTURECORD MATCHES
6-6ACTUALvs6.6-5.4FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.6 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME+2.6
TEXAS TECH won 6 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 6.6. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERTCUTEXAS TECH2017 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Foster SawyerPORTAL · STEPHEN F. AUSTIN · SHARE NOT MEASURED
RB0%Trevorris JohnsonPORTAL · OREGON STATE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
WR/TE0%Deante GrayWR · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%James McFarlandDE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%Paul WhitmillLB · SHARE NOT MEASURED
DB0%Denzel JohnsonS · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION2 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
RBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
WR/TEJalen Reagor · SIGNEE ★4Omar Manning · SIGNEE ★4Kenedy Snell · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLCorey Bethley · SIGNEE ★3George Ellis III · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
LBConnor Koch · SIGNEEINTACT
DBNoah Daniels · SIGNEE ★3Garret Wallow · SIGNEE ★3Kerry Johnson · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · TCU
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———895CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———768CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————36CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————20CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————16CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————14CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————18CARRIED FROM 2016 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE77th77
BLUE-CHIP RATIO32%83
RECRUITING CLASS#28 · 4/19 BC80
CLASS RANK TREND-7 · 2 CYCLES36
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 2nd YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX8%12
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
TTUKLIFF KINGSBURY2TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
TCUGARY PATTERSON2TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESTCU OFFENSETTU OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
89
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSETEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU QUARTERBACKSn=511% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
KENNY HILLQBRET
————UNR—
GRAYSON MUEHLSTEINQBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
MIKE COLLINSQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
ASAPH ZAMORAQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
JACK ADAMSQBTRUE FR
————UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 49 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——0%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU OFFENSIVE LINEn=20RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
PATRICK MORRISCRET
————UNR—
MATT PRYORGRET
————UNR—
TREY ELLIOTTGRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
CORDEL IWUAGWUGRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
DAVID BOLISOMIOTRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU FRONT-7n=29 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MYCHEALON THOMASDLRET
————UNR—
LONZELL GILMOREDLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
BRODERICK WASHINGTON JR.DLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
QUENTIN YONTZDLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
NICK MCCANNDLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
76
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU RUNNING BACKSn=824% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
SEWO OLONILUARBRET
—4TH YR——★4—
STACY BOYDRBRET
————UNR—
KYLE HICKSRBRET
————UNR—
DARIUS ANDERSONRBRET
—4TH YR——★4—
OMEGA STALLWORTHRBTRUE FR
—3RD YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 8
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU FRONT-72 ROOMS · 29 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TETCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYTEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU PASS CATCHERSn=36RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JALEN REAGORWRTRUE FR
—3RD YR——★4—
EMANUEL PORTERWRRET
————UNR—
SHAUN NIXONWRRET
————UNR—
DESMON WHITEWRRET
————UNR—
TAJ WILLIAMSWRRET
————UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU SECONDARYn=20 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
WILLIE SYKESDBRET
————UNR—
KEVIN MOOREDBRET
————★3—
DOUGLAS COLEMAN IIIDBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
DAMARCUS FIELDSDBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
DESMON SMITHDBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
TCU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TTU
SP+ OVERALL
18.9
4.8
FPI
16.9
5.6
ELO
1817
1527
TALENT
673
575
PRODUCTION
88
60
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−12
+1
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.32
0.04
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
TCU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TTU
PASS RATE
45.4%
55.8%
PACE
27.0s
24.4s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
12%
21%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
61.5%
51.2%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
62.0%
72.2%
PLAYS / GAME
66.8
73.8
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
0.6%
0.7%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = TCU, ORANGE = TTU) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2017, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE