SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2019 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2019›WEEK 9›TTU @ KU›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
ND @ MICH77
MIA @ PITT76
SC @ TENN75
OHIO @ BALL74
IOWA @ NU73
PSU @ MSU72
IU @ NEB71
TULN @ NAVY71
TROY @ GAST71
USU @ AF71
USC @ COLO69
UVA @ LOU69
BC @ CLEM68
EMU @ TOL67
CMU @ BUF67
ARK @ ALA67
SJSU @ ARMY66
DUKE @ UNC64
WSU @ ORE64
MSST @ TA&M63
AUB @ LSU63
MIZ @ UK63
UCF @ TEM62
CAL @ UTAH62
WKU @ MRSH60
SDSU @ UNLV60
WIS @ OSU59
UNT @ CLT59
OKST @ ISU57
HAW @ UNM57
USM @ RICE56
SYR @ FSU56
APP @ USA55
ILL @ PUR55
OU @ KSU55
TEX @ TCU55
USF @ ECU55
MEM @ TLSA55
ASU @ UCLA55
ARIZ @ STAN52
SMU @ HOU51
FIU @ MTSU51
TTU @ KU51
FAU @ ODU50
MD @ MINN50
TXST @ ARST49
LIB @ RUTG42
NMSU @ GASO42
NEV @ WYO41
M-OH @ KENT41
CSU @ FRES40
AKR @ NIU37
BGSU @ WMU35
LT @ UTEP29
CONN @ MASS26
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
TEXAS TECH
KANSAS
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2019
SAT 19:00 ET|MEMORIAL STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP10|O/U65.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
56FPI
TTUB12TEXAS TECH
34
4-8
57
64
34
58%
96
64
36.0
—
-6.5
HOME
—AP
106FPI
KUB12KANSAS
37
3-9
47
36
29
42%
9
94
29.5
—
+6.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2019CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALTTU34—KU37
CLOSED TTU -6.5TOTAL 65.5KU COVERED · 71 POINTS · OVER
TTU
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
KU
34
POINTS
37
483
TOTAL YARDS
527
271 (23-34)
PASSING
415 (26-37)
212 (45)
RUSHING
112 (32)
28
FIRST DOWNS
22
6-15
THIRD DOWN
9-15
2-2
FOURTH DOWN
0-0
32:28
TIME OF POSS.
27:32
8-69
PENALTIES
8-88
2
TURNOVERS
1
1
SACKS
0
0
QB HURRIES
1
TTU
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
KU
0.293
SEASON 0.245
EPA / PLAY
0.487
SEASON 0.203
47.4%
SEASON 44.9%
SUCCESS RATE
50.7%
SEASON 39.9%
14.1%
SEASON 15.3%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
14.9%
SEASON 13.4%
6.19
SEASON 6.25
YARDS / PLAY
8.03
SEASON 5.69
0.487
SEASON 0.279
EPA ALLOWED
0.293
SEASON 0.319
50.7%
SEASON 42.1%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
47.4%
SEASON 49.8%
14.9%
SEASON 18.4%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
14.1%
SEASON 16.7%
26.7%
SEASON 19.1%
STUFF RATE
13.6%
SEASON 17.9%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2019 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 9 FIELD n=55
MARKET
TOTAL65.5
SPREADTTU -6.5
IMPLIED — TTU36.0
IMPLIED — KU29.5
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
49FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
5 / 55
BY ENVIRONMENT
32 / 55
DISAGREEMENT27 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 27 positions on a 55-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × SLOW
TTU PACE23.5s
96
KU PACE29.2s
9
SHARED PACE26.4s
53
PLAY VOLUME138
53
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
TTU56CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
15
TEMPO
96
EXPLOSIVE15p
15
TEMPO96p
96
KU50CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
90
TEMPO
9
EXPLOSIVE90p
90
TEMPO9p
9
IS THE RECORD REAL2019 · FULL SEASON
TTURECORD UNDERSTATES
4-8ACTUALvs6.0-6.0FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-2.0 W
ONE SCORE RECORD0-4
POINT MARGIN / GAME+0.2
TEXAS TECH won 4 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 6.0. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
KURECORD MATCHES
3-9ACTUALvs3.2-8.8FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-0.2 W
ONE SCORE RECORD2-3
POINT MARGIN / GAME-12.6
KANSAS won 3 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 3.2. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERTEXAS TECHKANSAS2019 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Colt GarrettQB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
RB0%Tre KingRB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
WR/TE0%Zach AustinWR · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%Joseph WallacePORTAL · SAM HOUSTON · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
LB0%Tony JonesLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB0%Justus ParkerDB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION5 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
RBDadrion Taylor-Demerson · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
WR/TEAlante Brown · SIGNEE ★3Simon Gonzalez · SIGNEE ★3Trey Cleveland · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
LBTyrique Matthews · SIGNEE ★3Bryce Robinson · SIGNEE ★3Chance Cover · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DBAlex Hogan · SIGNEE ★3Devyn Butler · SIGNEE ★2INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · TEXAS TECH
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———905CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———385CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————23CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————20CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————19CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————16CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————23CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE57th57
BLUE-CHIP RATIO5%50
RECRUITING CLASS#61 · 0/21 BC55
CLASS RANK TREND-12 · 3 CYCLES26
COACH STATUSNEW HEAD COACH—
DEV TRANSITION MIX32%67
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
KULES MILESFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
TTUMATT WELLSFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESTTU OFFENSEKU OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBTEXAS TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
90
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSEKANSAS DEFENSE
TTU QUARTERBACKSn=510% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JACKSON TYNERQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
JETT DUFFEYQBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
ALAN BOWMANQBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
MAVERICK MCIVORQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
LOGAN GREENEQBTRUE FR
—1ST YR——UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
KU DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 52 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——6%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——5%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLTEXAS TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7KANSAS DEFENSE
TTU OFFENSIVE LINEn=20RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
WESTON WRIGHTOLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
TRAVIS BRUFFYOLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
DAWSON DEATONOLRET
—3RD YR——★3—
MADISON AKAMNONUOLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
TERENCE STEELEOLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
KU FRONT-7n=32 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CALEB SAMPSONDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
KYRON JOHNSONDERET
—4TH YR——★3—
WILLIE MCCALEBDERET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SAM BURTDLRET
—4TH YR——★2—
JELANI BROWNDTRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBTEXAS TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
38
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7KANSAS DEFENSE
TTU RUNNING BACKSn=562% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
CHUX NWABUKO IIIRBTRUE FR
—2ND YR——★3—
ARMAND SHYNERBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
JAX WELCHRBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SARODORICK THOMPSONRBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
TA'ZHAWN HENRYRBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
KU FRONT-72 ROOMS · 32 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——6%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TETEXAS TECH OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYKANSAS DEFENSE
TTU PASS CATCHERSn=23RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
KESEAN CARTERWRRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SIMON GONZALEZTETRUE FR
—3RD YR——★3—
DONTA THOMPSONTERET
—4TH YR——UNR—
MYLLER ROYALSWRTRUE FR
—2ND YR——★3—
ERIK EZUKANMAWRRET
—2ND YR——★4—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
KU SECONDARYn=20 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DEANTE FORDSRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
BRYCE TORNEDENSRET
—4TH YR——★2—
MIKE LEESRET
—4TH YR——★3—
NICK CAUDLESRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
ELMORE HEMPSTEAD JR.CBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
TTU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
KU
SP+ OVERALL
2.7
-9.8
FPI
2.0
-9.7
ELO
1537
1222
TALENT
577
529
PRODUCTION
60
20
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
−6
+23
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.05
0.06
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
TTU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
KU
OFF EFFICIENCY
65
30
DEF EFFICIENCY
51
3
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
15
90
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
3
88
FINISHING DRIVES
35
26
FIELD POSITION
57
70
TURNOVER MARGIN
64
7
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
TTU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
KU
PASS RATE
57.4%
54.3%
PACE
23.5s
29.2s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
22%
21%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
46.8%
55.1%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
67.9%
71.9%
PLAYS / GAME
76.5
61.6
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.3%
3.2%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = TTU, ORANGE = KU) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2019, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE