SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2019 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2019›WEEK 12›TCU @ TTU›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
UGA @ AUB80
FLA @ MIZ76
SC @ TA&M71
WMU @ OHIO69
MSU @ MICH67
WIS @ NEB67
WAKE @ CLEM67
UK @ VAN66
TEX @ ISU66
FRES @ SDSU65
OSU @ RUTG64
MEM @ HOU64
SYR @ DUKE64
UCLA @ UTAH64
ALA @ MSST63
UNC @ PITT61
AF @ CSU61
NAVY @ ND60
CMU @ BALL60
UL @ USA60
LSU @ MISS60
ARIZ @ ORE60
HAW @ UNLV59
BUF @ KENT58
OU @ BAY58
UNM @ BOIS58
VT @ GT57
CIN @ USF57
APP @ GAST57
USC @ CAL57
TULN @ TEM56
MINN @ IOWA56
TCU @ TTU55
ASU @ ORST55
IU @ PSU54
LOU @ NCSU54
STAN @ WSU53
KU @ OKST51
WYO @ USU51
CCU @ ARST49
ULM @ GASO49
WVU @ KSU47
MASS @ NU46
NIU @ TOL45
TROY @ TXST42
UTEP @ UAB41
USM @ UTSA41
LT @ MRSH40
RICE @ MTSU38
BGSU @ M-OH32
EMU @ AKR31
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
TCU
TEXAS TECH
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2019
SAT 12:00 ET|JONES AT&T STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP22|O/U53.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
37FPI
TCUB12TCU
33
5-7
79
29
83
69%
88
62
28.5
—
-3.5
HOME
—AP
56FPI
TTUB12TEXAS TECH
31
4-8
57
64
34
58%
96
84
25.0
—
+3.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2019CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALTCU33—TTU31
CLOSED TCU -3.5TOTAL 53.5TTU COVERED · 64 POINTS · OVER
TCU
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
TTU
33
POINTS
31
549
TOTAL YARDS
402
323 (25-42)
PASSING
333 (19-33)
226 (53)
RUSHING
69 (18)
28
FIRST DOWNS
16
15-24
THIRD DOWN
5-11
0-0
FOURTH DOWN
0-0
43:26
TIME OF POSS.
16:34
7-60
PENALTIES
5-46
0
TURNOVERS
2
1
SACKS
3
2
QB HURRIES
7
TCU
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
TTU
0.266
SEASON 0.181
EPA / PLAY
0.449
SEASON 0.245
42.5%
SEASON 41.9%
SUCCESS RATE
42.0%
SEASON 44.9%
17.0%
SEASON 14.7%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
24.0%
SEASON 15.3%
6.03
SEASON 5.57
YARDS / PLAY
8.22
SEASON 6.25
0.449
SEASON 0.165
EPA ALLOWED
0.266
SEASON 0.279
42.0%
SEASON 37.2%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
42.5%
SEASON 42.1%
24.0%
SEASON 14.6%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
17.0%
SEASON 18.4%
5.9%
SEASON 22.6%
STUFF RATE
10.2%
SEASON 19.1%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2019 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT6 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 12 FIELD n=51
MARKET
TOTAL53.5
SPREADTCU -3.5
IMPLIED — TCU28.5
IMPLIED — TTU25.0
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
54FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
28 / 51
BY ENVIRONMENT
18 / 51
DISAGREEMENT10 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 10 positions on a 51-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
FAST × FAST
TCU PACE24.6s
88
TTU PACE23.5s
96
SHARED PACE24.1s
92
PLAY VOLUME150
92
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
TCU45CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
2
TEMPO
88
EXPLOSIVE2p
2
TEMPO88p
88
TTU56CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
15
TEMPO
96
EXPLOSIVE15p
15
TEMPO96p
96
IS THE RECORD REAL2019 · FULL SEASON
TCURECORD UNDERSTATES
5-7ACTUALvs7.0-5.0FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-2.0 W
ONE SCORE RECORD1-6
POINT MARGIN / GAME+3.9
TCU won 5 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 7.0. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TTURECORD UNDERSTATES
4-8ACTUALvs6.0-6.0FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE-2.0 W
ONE SCORE RECORD0-4
POINT MARGIN / GAME+0.2
TEXAS TECH won 4 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 6.0. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERTCUTEXAS TECH2019 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%Grayson MuehlsteinQB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
RB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
WR/TE0%Cole NovakTE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION6 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%Trey ElliottG · SHARE NOT MEASURED
DL0%L.J. CollierDRAFTED · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
LB0%Arico EvansLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION5 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB0%Ridwan IssahakuS · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO STARTING ROLE OPENEDINTACT
RBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
WR/TEBlair Conwright · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLAndrew Coker · SIGNEE ★3Brannon Brown · SIGNEE ★3Marcus Williams · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DLJaquaze Sorrells · SIGNEE ★4Karter Johnson · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
LBDylan Jordan · SIGNEE ★3Zach Marcheselli · SIGNEE ★3Wyatt Harris · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
DBDonavann Collins · SIGNEE ★3Deshawn McCuin · SIGNEE ★3Millard Bradford · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · TCU
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———697CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———1009CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————26CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————19CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————17CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————11CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————25CARRIED FROM 2018 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE79th79
BLUE-CHIP RATIO21%77
RECRUITING CLASS#33 · 5/23 BC76
CLASS RANK TREND-5 · 3 CYCLES40
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 4th YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX23%23
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
TTUMATT WELLSFIRST SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
A new staff, so the coach's own career fingerprint stands in for the programme's prior season.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A NEW STAFF
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|8.61%n=240
|Δ HAVOC|2.50%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE|5.18%n=240
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|5.24%n=87
|Δ PACE|1.63sn=240
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
TCUGARY PATTERSON4TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESTCU OFFENSETTU OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
69
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSETEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU QUARTERBACKSn=731% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MAX DUGGANQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★4—
ALEX DELTONQBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——UNR—
MIKE COLLINSQBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
MATTHEW BALDWINQBTRUE FR
—1ST YR——★4—
GRANT BEUCLERQBTRUE FR
—2ND YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 7
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 58 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——4%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU OFFENSIVE LINEn=19RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
COY MCMILLONCRET
—4TH YR——★3—
LUCAS NIANGOTRET
—4TH YR——★3—
CORDEL IWUAGWUGRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
QUAZZEL WHITEOLRET
—3RD YR——★3—
DAVID BOLISOMIOTRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU FRONT-7n=35 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JAYLON HUTCHINGSDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
TONY BRADFORD JR.DLTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
LONZELL GILMOREDLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
BRODERICK WASHINGTON JR.DLRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
HOUSTON MILLERDLRET
—3RD YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
100
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU RUNNING BACKSn=90% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DAIMARQUA FOSTERRBTRUE FR
—2ND YR——★4—
SEWO OLONILUARBRET
—4TH YR——★4—
DARWIN BARLOWRBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
EMARI DEMERCADORBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
DARIUS ANDERSONRBRET
—4TH YR——★4—
SHOW ALL 9
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU FRONT-72 ROOMS · 35 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TETCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYTEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU PASS CATCHERSn=26RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
TE'VAILANCE HUNTWRRET
—4TH YR——★4—
BLAIR CONWRIGHTWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
ARTAYVIOUS LYNNTERET
—4TH YR——★3—
AL'DONTRE DAVISWRRET
—4TH YR——★3—
JALEN REAGORWRRET
—3RD YR——★4—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU SECONDARYn=23 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
ALEX HOGANDBTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
DOUGLAS COLEMAN IIIDBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
DAMARCUS FIELDSDBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
DESMON SMITHDBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
ADAM BECKDBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
TCU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TTU
SP+ OVERALL
6.7
2.7
FPI
7.3
2.0
ELO
1625
1537
TALENT
692
577
PRODUCTION
68
60
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+10
−6
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.21
0.05
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
TCU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TTU
PASS RATE
47.9%
57.4%
PACE
24.6s
23.5s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
10%
22%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
61.2%
46.8%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
66.0%
67.9%
PLAYS / GAME
73.2
76.5
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.4%
1.3%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = TCU, ORANGE = TTU) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2019, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE