SCOUTTEAM
● LIVE|2021 SEASON|FBS PERCENTILES|
HOME›SLATE›2021›WEEK 6›TCU @ TTU›OVERVIEWMARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT
SITE
F1SLATEF2LEADERSF3TEAMSF4PORTALF5RECRUIT
THIS WEEK
PSU @ IOWA81
TCU @ TTU80
UVA @ LOU79
OU @ TEX76
ND @ VT72
MSU @ RUTG71
WVU @ BAY70
FAU @ UAB68
MICH @ NEB68
UTAH @ USC68
WIS @ ILL67
UTSA @ WKU66
VAN @ FLA64
UGA @ AUB64
TEM @ CIN63
WAKE @ SYR63
UTEP @ USM63
HOU @ TULN62
ARK @ MISS62
LSU @ UK62
STAN @ ASU61
ORST @ WSU61
MD @ OSU60
MEM @ TLSA60
BOIS @ BYU59
ALA @ TA&M58
SC @ TENN57
SJSU @ CSU56
CLT @ FIU55
M-OH @ EMU55
MTSU @ LIB55
UNM @ SDSU54
CCU @ ARST53
FSU @ UNC53
WYO @ AF53
USA @ TXST52
BUF @ KENT52
SMU @ NAVY50
GT @ DUKE49
CMU @ OHIO49
BALL @ WMU49
ODU @ MRSH48
ECU @ UCF48
GASO @ TROY47
NIU @ TOL46
UCLA @ ARIZ45
GAST @ ULM39
UNT @ MIZ35
CONN @ MASS34
NMSU @ NEV33
AKR @ BGSU30
FIDELITY
MEASURED
DERIVED
≈ ESTIMATED
DOT MARKS
TCU
TEXAS TECH
OVERVIEWPRESEASON PROFILE
MATCHUPHEAD TO HEAD
TEAMROOMS & PLAYERS
VINTAGE2021
SAT 19:00 ET|JONES AT&T STADIUMCONFTENSIONVACATEDTALENT GAP18|O/U60.5COLLISION
75
AP · FPI
TEAM
PTS
2025
TAL
OFF
DEF
RET
PACE
SOS ▾
IMP
ML
SPREAD
AWAY
—AP
68FPI
TCUB12TCU
52
5-7
75
91
19
84%
29
88
31.5
—
-2.5
HOME
—AP
50FPI
TTUB12TEXAS TECH
31
6-6
58
88
34
63%
9
96
29.0
—
+2.5
IMP = IMPLIED TEAM TOTAL FROM SPREAD + O/U · OFF AND DEF ARE SCOUT TEAM GRADES AS FBS PERCENTILES · EVERY MEASURED FIGURE IS 2021CONSENSUS · CONSENSUS
FINALTCU52—TTU31
CLOSED TCU -2.5TOTAL 60.5TCU COVERED · 83 POINTS · OVER
TCU
OFFICIAL BOX SCORE
TTU
52
POINTS
31
498
TOTAL YARDS
558
104 (8-10)
PASSING
344 (23-41)
394 (47)
RUSHING
214 (37)
18
FIRST DOWNS
25
9-14
THIRD DOWN
4-13
1-1
FOURTH DOWN
3-6
28:54
TIME OF POSS.
31:06
4-50
PENALTIES
4-25
0
TURNOVERS
1
1
SACKS
0
1
QB HURRIES
1
TCU
DERIVED · PLAY BY PLAY
TTU
0.572
SEASON 0.308
EPA / PLAY
0.323
SEASON 0.337
47.4%
SEASON 45.2%
SUCCESS RATE
53.3%
SEASON 47.5%
22.8%
SEASON 17.4%
EXPLOSIVE RATE
13.0%
SEASON 16.5%
8.74
SEASON 6.92
YARDS / PLAY
7.26
SEASON 6.90
0.323
SEASON 0.372
EPA ALLOWED
0.572
SEASON 0.297
53.3%
SEASON 48.2%
SUCCESS ALLOWED
47.4%
SEASON 43.4%
13.0%
SEASON 18.4%
EXPLOSIVE ALLOWED
22.8%
SEASON 14.8%
8.3%
SEASON 12.3%
STUFF RATE
17.0%
SEASON 15.0%
OFFICIAL FIGURES ARE THE BOX SCORE AS SCORED. DERIVED FIGURES COME FROM PLAY BY PLAY WITH GARBAGE TIME REMOVED, SO THEY COUNT A DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYS AND WILL NOT TIE OUT AGAINST THE OFFICIAL COLUMN. A BRIGHTENED SIDE LEADS THAT ROW BY THE DIRECTION IN ITS TOOLTIP; TIME OF POSSESSION IS UNMARKED BECAUSE IT IS A TENDENCY, NOT A VIRTUE. SEASON AVERAGES ARE REGULAR SEASON ONLY. MARKET FIGURES ARE BOOK CONSENSUS, NEVER MODEL OUTPUT.
DATA BASISNOTHING ON THIS TAB IS MEASURED YET · 2021 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
MEASURED0 OF 12 GAMES
Real 2026 data. It accumulates weekly and replaces carried figures metric by metric, on the schedules below.
CARRIED14 ROOMS
What each roster did last season, applied player by player. Transfers name the school.
PROGRAM PRIOR2 STAFFS
The programme's own prior identity — or, where the staff is new, the coach's career fingerprint with its sample.
PRESEASON FACT7 PER TEAM
Talent, recruiting, vacated usage, portal and coach status. Preseason inputs.
ABSENT2 CLASSES
Current season luck and situational splits. Shown absent with the reason, never estimated.
FLIPS TO MEASUREDABSENTNOT MEASURED. This asks how many weeks into a season each number becomes trustworthy, which is a within-season question. The back-test measures relationships between one season and the next, so it cannot answer it.
MARKET LINE VS TEAM PROFILEGAME LEVEL · WEEK 6 FIELD n=51
MARKET
TOTAL60.5
SPREADTCU -2.5
IMPLIED — TCU31.5
IMPLIED — TTU29.0
SCORING ENVIRONMENT
67FBS PCTL
BOTH OFF × BOTH DEF
BY MARKET TOTAL
16 / 51
BY ENVIRONMENT
5 / 51
DISAGREEMENT11 SLOTSThe two rankings disagree by 11 positions on a 51-game board. Both figures are stated; the site does not resolve which is right.
PACE COLLISION
SLOW × SLOW
TCU PACE28.1s
29
TTU PACE30.0s
9
SHARED PACE29.0s
19
PLAY VOLUME124
19
CEILING CHARACTERIDENTITY · NOT QUALITY
TCU61CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
94
TEMPO
29
EXPLOSIVE94p
94
TEMPO29p
29
TTU38CEILING
EXPLOSIVE
68
TEMPO
9
EXPLOSIVE68p
68
TEMPO9p
9
IS THE RECORD REAL2021 · FULL SEASON
TCURECORD MATCHES
5-7ACTUALvs4.6-7.4FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.4 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME-6.3
TCU won 5 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 4.6. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TTURECORD MATCHES
6-6ACTUALvs5.5-6.5FROM SCORING
GAP TO SCORING PROFILE+0.5 W
ONE SCORE RECORD3-2
POINT MARGIN / GAME-2.1
TEXAS TECH won 6 of 12 against a scoring profile describing 5.5. Both are facts about the same season; the market prices the first.
TEAM LEDGERTCUTEXAS TECH2021 PRESEASON · NO GAMES PLAYED
VACATED USAGE — AND DID THE ROSTER REFILL ITOPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
VACATED USAGE BY ROOMLEFT OPEN, LARGEST FIRST
QB0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
RB0%Darwin BarlowPORTAL · USC · SHARE NOT MEASURED
WR/TE0%Te'Vailance HuntPORTAL · ARKANSAS STATE · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION4 FURTHER DEPARTURES
OL0%NOBODY LEFTTHE WHOLE ROOM RETURNS
DL0%Brandon BowenPORTAL · INCARNATE WORD · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
LB0%Elias Garcia OlagueLB · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION3 FURTHER DEPARTURES
DB0%Ar'Darius WashingtonS · SHARE NOT MEASUREDROTATION1 FURTHER DEPARTURE
SHARE OF LAST SEASON'S ROOM PARTICIPATION THAT DEPARTED, LARGEST FIRST · OPEN VOLUME IS A FACT, NOT AN ASSIGNMENT
PORTAL & CLASS INTAKE — WHO CAME INHEADCOUNT, NOT A PROJECTION
QBNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
RBMonte Watkins · SIGNEE ★4INTACT
WR/TEShadrach Banks · PORTAL ★3 · TEXAS A&MGeor'quarius Spivey · PORTAL ★3 · MISSISSIPPI STATEChase Jackson · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
OLNO DEPARTURE TO REFILLINTACT
DLChris Murray · SIGNEE ★3Landyn Watson · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
LBJayhvion Gipson · SIGNEE ★3Ryan Quintanar · SIGNEEINTACT
DBT.J. Carter · PORTAL ★3 · MEMPHISD'Arco Perkins-McAllister · SIGNEE ★4Marvin Covington · SIGNEE ★3INTACT
PORTAL AND SIGNING-CLASS ARRIVALS AT EACH ROOM THAT LOST VOLUME · A HEADCOUNT, NEVER A USAGE PROJECTION
CARRIED GRADES & TEAM FACTS — THIS ROSTER, TODAYCARRIED FROM 2025, RE-HOMED PLAYER BY PLAYER · TCU
CARRIED COMPOSITE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED OFFENSE
0.00 PCTL
CARRIED DEFENSE
0.00 PCTL
ROOM
GRADE
FBS PCTL
OPP-ADJ
TAL
RET
N
OBS
QB———1004CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
RB———717CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
WR/TE————30CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
OL————18CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DL————11CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
LB————10CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
DB————20CARRIED FROM 2020 · NOTHING GRADED YET
TEAM FACTS — FULLY KNOWN NOWPRESEASON FACT
TALENT COMPOSITE75th75
BLUE-CHIP RATIO27%82
RECRUITING CLASS#61 · 3/16 BC55
CLASS RANK TREND-28 · 3 CYCLES0
PORTAL NET BLUE-CHIP-1 · 6 IN / 23 OUT—
COACH STATUSRETURNING · 6th YR—
DEV TRANSITION MIX29%42
EVERY ROW HERE IS KNOWABLE TODAY — NONE OF IT WAITS ON A GAME
COACH PRIOR — WHO APPLIES, AND WHAT A CHANGE MOVESBASIS · PROGRAM PRIOR
TTUMATT WELLS3TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
TCUGARY PATTERSON6TH SEASONNO CAREER RECORD
The programme's own prior season applies, under the same returning staff.
HOW MUCH IDENTITY MOVES WITH A RETURNING STAFF
|Δ PACE|1.37sn=929
|Δ EXPLOSIVENESS|6.72%n=931
|Δ HAVOC|2.10%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE|4.28%n=929
|Δ PASS RATE OVER EXPECTED|4.07%n=311
MEDIAN ABSOLUTE SEASON-TO-SEASON SHIFT · 2016-2026 · MAGNITUDE, NOT DIRECTION — A NEW STAFF MOVES PASS RATE AND PACE BARELY MORE THAN A RETURNING ONE
POSITION GROUPS — WHERE THE VOLUME LIVESTCU OFFENSETTU OFFENSERETURNINGDEPARTED
COLLAPSE ALL
▾QBTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
100
NATIONAL
—
RET
—
FULL DEFENSETEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU QUARTERBACKSn=40% VACATED
QUARTERBACKS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MAX DUGGANQBRET
—4TH YR——★4—
MATTHEW DOWNINGQBRET
—3RD YR——★2—
CHANDLER MORRISQBPORTAL · OKLAHOMA
—4TH YR——★3—
LUKE PARDEEQBRET
—2ND YR——UNR—
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU DEFENSE — GROUP GRADES3 ROOMS · 51 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
DEFENSIVE ROOMS · GROUP GRADES
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
——0%
SECONDARYDB
——5%
THE QUARTERBACK PLAYS THE WHOLE SIDE — SHOWN AS ITS THREE ROOM GRADES, NOT MAN FOR MAN · PER PLAYER DETAIL LIVES IN THE OTHER DRAWERS
▾OLTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU OFFENSIVE LINEn=18RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
FIVE-MAN LINE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
ANDREW COKEROLRET
—3RD YR——★3—
TYLER GUYTONOLRET
—3RD YR——★3—
BLAKE HICKEYGRET
—4TH YR——★3—
WES HARRISGRET
—4TH YR——★4—
COY MCMILLONCRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU FRONT-7n=31 · 2 ROOMSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS RUSH · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
JAYLON HUTCHINGSDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
TONY BRADFORD JR.DLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
TROY TE'ODLRET
—3RD YR——UNR—
DEVIN DREWDLRET
—3RD YR——★3—
NELSON MBANASORDLRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
▾RBTCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
71
DL
—
DL RET
—
LB
—
LB RET
—
FRONT-7TEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU RUNNING BACKSn=729% VACATED
BACKFIELD · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
DAIMARQUA FOSTERRBRET
—2ND YR——★4—
DERYL REYNOLDSRBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
KENDRE MILLERRBRET
—3RD YR——★3—
MONTE WATKINSRBTRUE FR
—3RD YR——★4—
EMARI DEMERCADORBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
SHOW ALL 7
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU FRONT-72 ROOMS · 31 PLAYERSRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
ROOMS IN THE COMPOSITE
WT
GRD
RET
BLU
DEFENSIVE LINEDL
0.55——0%
LINEBACKERSLB
0.45——0%
EACH ROOM ON ITS OWN GRADE, NOT LISTED MAN FOR MAN · THE WEIGHTS DEFINE WHO PLAYS WHOM
▾WR/TETCU OFFENSE
NATIONAL
—
TAL
—
PERF
—
RET
—
DB
—
DB RET
—
SECONDARYTEXAS TECH DEFENSE
TCU PASS CATCHERSn=30RETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
PASS CATCHERS · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
QUINCY BROWNWRTRUE FR
—4TH YR——★3—
GEOR'QUARIUS SPIVEYTEPORTAL · MISSISSIPPI STATE
—4TH YR——★3—
BLAIR CONWRIGHTWRRET
—4TH YR——★3—
JAKE NEUFELDWRRET
—3RD YR——★2—
SAM BANKSWRTRUE FR
—1ST YR——UNR—
SHOW TOP 10
PARTICIPATION SHARE IS OF THIS ROOM · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TTU SECONDARYn=20 · 1 ROOMRETURNING SHARE NOT MEASURED
COVERAGE · PLAYED THIS SEASON FIRST
OVR
EXP
PT%
TAL
★REC
vsCOH
MARQUIS WATERSDBPORTAL · DUKE
—4TH YR——★3—
DAMARCUS FIELDSDBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
KOSI ELDRIDGEDBRET
—4TH YR——UNR—
ADRIAN FRYEDBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
DADRION TAYLOR-DEMERSONDBRET
—4TH YR——★3—
SHOW TOP 10
THE DEFENDERS THIS ROOM FACES, BY GRADE · THESE SIX COLUMNS DESCRIBE THE ROSTER · PASS RUSH AND COVERAGE DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
RETURNINGPORTAL — PRIOR SCHOOL AND PORTAL STARS NAMEDLAST YR ≈ — RATES FROM HIS LAST MEASURED SEASON, NOT THE PROJECTED ROLEDEPARTEDVS COH = PRODUCTION vs OWN RECRUITING COHORT MEDIAN · CURVE = AHEAD / ON / BEHIND AT ±8 · PT% IS HIS SHARE OF HIS OWN ROOM · UNIT-AGAINST-UNIT AND USAGE DETAIL IS ON THE MATCHUP TAB
TEAM QUALITYHOUSE GRADE + REFERENCES
METRIC
TCU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TTU
SP+ OVERALL
-0.6
9.8
FPI
0.4
4.0
ELO
1405
1554
TALENT
699
607
PRODUCTION
37
70
TALENT − PRODUCTION ▾
+37
−15
BLUE CHIP RATIO
0.27
0.08
SCOUT TEAM GRADE DECOMPOSES INTO OFFENSE AND DEFENSE, EACH BUILT FROM THE POSITION ROOM GRADES ABOVE · ROOM WEIGHTS ARE MEASURED AGAINST UNIT EPA, NOT ASSUMED · SPECIAL TEAMS ARE NOT IN IT YET
FIVE FACTORSNATIONAL PERCENTILES
METRIC
TCU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TTU
OFF EFFICIENCY
67
77
DEF EFFICIENCY
12
35
OFF EXPLOSIVENESS
93
68
DEF EXPLOSIVENESS
10
22
FINISHING DRIVES
38
83
FIELD POSITION
72
88
TURNOVER MARGIN
58
8
THE FIVE FACTORS ARE CORRELATED, NOT FIVE INDEPENDENT DIALS · TURNOVER MARGIN IS THE LEAST STABLE OF THEM YEAR OVER YEAR
TEAM IDENTITYTENDENCIES THAT SET VOLUME
METRIC
TCU
FBS PCTL 0 ── 100
TTU
PASS RATE
43.4%
50.7%
PACE
28.1s
30.0s
4TH-DOWN GO RATE
23%
36%
RUN RATE — STANDARD DNS
61.9%
56.8%
PASS RATE — PASSING DNS
55.2%
69.6%
PLAYS / GAME
64.1
60.0
GARBAGE TIME SHARE
1.6%
0.8%
EVERY ROW HERE IS COUNTED FROM PLAY BY PLAY · NONE OF IT IS A QUALITY RATING — FURTHER RIGHT IS MORE OF THE THING, NOT BETTER · SCHEME DETAIL LIVES ON THE MATCHUP TAB
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH-IS-GOOD · CELL SHADE = FBS PERCENTILE OF THE VALUE · DOTS PLOT BOTH TEAMS ON ONE 0–100 TRACK (GOLD = TCU, ORANGE = TTU) · MEASURED FIGURES ARE 2021, GARBAGE-TIME FILTERED
≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE · A CARRIED FIGURE IS WHAT A PLAYER DID LAST SEASON · PORTAL MARKS PARTICIPATION EARNED AT THE NAMED SCHOOL
VACATED VOLUME IS STATED AS OPEN AND NEVER ASSIGNED TO A SUCCESSOR · SPREAD, TOTAL, ML AND IMPLIED TOTALS ARE CONSENSUS MARKET FIGURES · NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE