5-10 · 205 LB|MIAMI★HS★3★PT—
SEASON SCOPED · ROOM AND USAGE METERS ONLY · NO RAW TRACKING COUNTS
KEY FACTSHOW THIS ORDER IS SET
ROLE · SHARE MEASUREDSTABILITY HIGH
HOLDS 26% OF HIS ROOM — 2 OF 4
MICAH FORD HOLDS 67% — THIS ROOM HAS ONE OWNER · 1 WITH NO SHARE MEASURED HERE ARE NOT SHOWN
SHARE OF POSITION ROOM PARTICIPATION · MEASURED AT THIS SCHOOL IN THIS SEASON ONLY
PRODUCTION · YARDS PER CARRYSTABILITY LOW
YARDS PER CARRY — 77TH PERCENTILE
His strongest measured production figure this season, ranked against every qualifying player at his position.
RANKED AGAINST 191 QUALIFYING PLAYERS · SEASON SCOPED FBS
HONESTY · EPA PER CARRY UNSTABLESTABILITY LOW
HIS EPA PER CARRY IS THE WEAKEST THING HERE TO CARRY FORWARD
64th percentile and measured — but the least repeatable figure on the page. It describes the season measured and says little about the next one.
STATED SO THE READER DOES NOT PRICE NOISE
ROLE — IS THE VOLUME HISSHARE OF ROOM · USAGE PERCENTILE · TEAM TARGET SHARE · CONTESTED, NOT LOCKED
THE ROOM — WHO ELSE CLAIMS IT
SEDRICK IRVIN26%
MICAH FORD HOLDS 67% — THIS ROOM HAS ONE OWNER · 1 WITH NO SHARE MEASURED HERE ARE NOT SHOWN
SHARE OF TEAM CARRIES BY GAMEPEAK 26%
W1W1
FORWARD PRIOR
ABSENT
No reliability blend has been computed for this player season.
PRODUCTION QUALITY — RB FAMILYVALUE · PERCENTILE · FIDELITY · VOLUME GATE · YEAR OVER YEAR STABILITY ON EVERY ROW
METRIC
VALUE
PCTL OF POOL
FID
STABILITY
GATE
DEFINITION
SEPARATION5151DMEDHOW RELIABLY HE WON HIS ROUTE AND FINISHED THE PLAY, BLENDING HIS PRODUCTION AND TARGET-EARNING RANKS WITH HIS HANDS
CREATION7575DHIGHTHE PART OF A RUN HE MADE HIMSELF, BLENDING YARDS AFTER CONTACT WITH TACKLES FORCED PER TOUCH
OVERALL4949DNONEOVERALL GRADE ON A FIXED 0-100 SCALE: 50 IS AN AVERAGE STARTER, SO A WHOLE ROOM CAN BE GOOD AT ONCE
EPA PER CARRY0.3364DLOWGATED
YARDS PER CARRY6.0077DLOWGATED
VS MAN / VS ZONE
COVERAGE SPLITS
ABSENT
Man and zone splits came from a charting source no longer held. Nothing else classifies a receiver's coverage, so the split is absent.
SHARES ARE OF CLASSIFIED SNAPS ONLY · THE 16% UNCLASSIFIED REMAINDER IS NEVER REDISTRIBUTED
CONTEXT — WHO AND AGAINST WHOM
2026 vs COHORT-25MEDIAN 3★ RB · n=207
2025 vs COHORT-24MEDIAN 3★ RB · n=344
2024 vs COHORT+26MEDIAN 3★ RB · n=346
2023 vs COHORT-31MEDIAN 3★ RB · n=332
PRODUCTION IS REPORTED AGAINST WHO IT CAME AGAINST — NEVER AS A RAW TOTAL ALONE
RECEIVING — HIS LINE AND WHERE HE IS TARGETED
TARGET SHARE2.7%THIN — OF TEAM TARGETS
DEPTH OF TARGET-1.5THIN — YARDS DOWNFIELD
CATCH RATE50.0%THIN — OF TARGETS
YARDS / CATCH5.0THIN —
YARDS AFTER CATCH8.0THIN — PER CATCH
DEEP TARGET RATE0.0%THIN — OF LOCATED TARGETS
SHORT RIGHT2100% OF TARGETS · 50% CAUGHT · 5 YDS
THE MAP COVERS ONLY THE WEEKS CFBD PUBLISHED A BALL LOCATION FOR — FROM WEEK 9 OF 2025.
GAME LOGFULL BOX LINE · POSTSEASON GAMES MARKED P
WK
DATE
H/A
OPPONENT
CAR
RYDS
RTD
TGT
REC
RECYD
RTD
STD
HALF
PPR
DK
FD
1AUG 29HHAWAI'I843011504.85.35.85.85.3 1SEP 5HMIAMI641010004.14.14.14.14.1 SEASON2 G1484021508.99.49.99.99.4
DK PER GAME4.9MEAN OF 2 GAMES
BOOM GAMES0 / 220-PLUS DK POINTS
BUST GAMES2 / 2UNDER 8 DK POINTS
CAREERACROSS SCHOOLS · THE PORTAL MOVE IS PART OF THE RECORD
SEASON
CL
SCHOOL
G
CAR
SCRIM
TD
TGT%
ROOM%
USE
NOTE
SCHOOL CHANGE — THE PORTAL MOVE IS PART OF THE RECORDROOM% AND USE ARE THE TWO PARTICIPATION METERS · NO RAW SNAP OR TRACKING COUNTS ANYWHERE ON THIS PAGE
EVERY PERCENTILE READS HIGH IS GOOD AND IS COMPUTED AGAINST QUALIFYING FBS PLAYERS AT HIS POSITION · FID MARKS HOW A FIGURE WAS PRODUCED — M MEASURED, D DERIVED, E ESTIMATED · ≈ MARKS AN ESTIMATED VALUE
A RATE APPEARS ONLY ABOVE ITS VOLUME GATE AND THE GATE IS STATED ON THE ROW · BELOW-GATE ROWS SHOW ABSENT WITH THE REASON · STABILITY IS YEAR OVER YEAR REPEATABILITY
COVERAGE SPLITS ARE SHARES OF CLASSIFIED SNAPS ONLY AND CARRY THE CLASSIFIED RATE · PORTAL FIGURES WERE EARNED AT THE SCHOOL NAMED · THE FORWARD PRIOR SUMMARISES WHAT TENDS TO PERSIST
NO PROJECTIONS ON THIS PAGE